What about those leaked e-mails.....
10 years ago, WikiLeaks became famous for exposing elements of the Bush administration and the Iraq wars, and quickly became heroes to the left. This year, Hillary Clinton is being exposed because of the unprecedented levels of corruption throughout her history. Julian Assange, who is not necessarily pro-Trump, has stated that if any controversial Trump material is found, it will be published.
As I continue.... A reminder:"The further a society drifts from truth, the more it will hate those who speak it."
“Just talked to Jackie – apparently because we’re talking about sexual harassment, the defamation risk is really high, but he hasn’t been litigious yet, so…"
"We don't have a ton on Simes, but the pro-Russia stuff ties in pretty well to idea that Trump is too friendly with Putin/weak on Russia"
The DNC was planning to push Trump/Russia narrative since April. In this email they are talking about some obscure "former Rand Paul adviser"'s ties to Russia and plan to exploit it to further the planned narrative. However their main concern is getting sued, knowing full well that it was fake and Trump could sue them.
Just think; I am only getting started......
Hillary's lawyer didn't want her to run because of the damning
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/51094 “Do we actually know who told Hillary she could use a private email? And has that person been drawn and quartered? Like whole thing is fucking insane."
"At least we now know why Cheryl didn't want her to run."
According to Podesta...
He thinks Cheryl Mills told her to use a private server.
He says Cheryl Mills didn't want her to run (because of the e-mails).
The same Cheryl Mills told Judicial Watch and the FBI she didn't know what a server was even though we have her e-mails asking about the server being hacked, etc. Apparently you can just memorize the phrase "I cannot recall" and you're immune to oversight.
Cheryl Mills is not really her "lawyer" though. Hillary as many lawyers around her so they can't testify against each other.
And the liberals want to have you focus on the Russians messing with our election campaigns?
Obama may have vetoed legislation in effort to torpedo Bernie's
“I can promise you that if President Obama signs this terrible legislation that blatantly validates Bernie's entire campaign message"
"this will give Bernie a huge boost"
"signing this bill will result in adding at least another month or more of money and attention to the Sanders campaign."
Gary Hirshberg wrote to John Podesta about how Obama needs to veto a bill to stop Bernie Sanders' message from getting traction. (Subject: Urgent need to talk and for you to act with the WH)
He's very interested to make sure this bill can never pass and never be signed into law. It would help Bernie Sanders and that would be incredibly bad in his view.
Gary Hirshberg is chairman and former president and CEO of a notable corporation in New Hampshire. New Hampshire is of course one of the most significant states politically in the nominating process and Hirshberg really didn't want Bernie to win.
The staff promises to discuss the Hirshberg proposition of killing this bill somehow to avoid Bernie"getting a huge boost". Podesta responds to the above: "Adding Corey. We’ll discuss."
It seems they successfully blocked this bill and avoided the "huge boost for Bernie" that they were so afraid of. The original email is from an earlier batch, but Podesta's response is significant here. Yesterday we have learned that Podesta asked "where to stick the knife" in Bernie in an email chain where they talked about making Bernie into "pulp" by various attacks. And when Podesta hears a suggestion that a Bill should be stopped, using (Obama if necessary) to "stop Bernie from getting a huge boost" what does Podesta do?
Does Podesta say, that's idiotic and never email me again? No. Does Podesta say the POTUS is not your tool to try to sabotage Bernie? No. What Podesta says is "Adding Corey. We will discuss" . These people had a deep seated hatred for Bernie the as the Wikileaks documents reveal.
The bill was introduced March 1, 2016. It hasn't moved since then.
"we are going to have to dump all those emails"
“On another matter....and not to sound like Lanny, but we are going to have to dump all those emails so better to do so sooner than later"
In this email, John Podesta writes to Clinton aide Cheryl Mills that "we are going to have to dump all those emails" RIGHT after the famous New York Times story broke about Hillary's private email server. They realized they'd have to destroy evidence as it had been made public. The congressional subpoena came two days later.
They discussed the destruction of evidence in this email prior to the official subpoena orders, due to the fact that now that their secret was exposed, they knew they would be subpoenaed shortly, which turned out to be the next day. They hadn't got the order yet, but they saw the writing on the wall.
However, this is still illegal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(e) and 18 U.S. Code § 1519.
It's called Spoliation, which means if you don't have a subpoena in hand but its reasonable to assume one is incoming, it is still illegal to destroy evidence.
It is unclear who "Lanny" is referring to. According to Zerohedge, Lanny could be "the infamous former DOJ staffer Lanny Breuer who quit in January 2013 after telling Frontline that some banks are too big to fail, or, more likely Lanny Davis, special counsel to President Bill Clinton, and spokesperson for the President and the White House on matters concerning campaign-finance investigations and other legal issues."
This email exchange almost assuredly signals that there was intent to mislead and delete incriminating emails, something the Clinton campaign has been trying to deny for quite some time.
Hey! I am just getting started......stay tuned.
Fact#8Where are our liberal posters on here? Are they hiding in the bushes?
More CNN collusion with Hillary's campaign
"Unless I hear otherwise, we’ll send to our friends and allies list at noon and Jesse will get it leaked to Dan Merica at CNN."
It seems as if half of these emails are related to media collusion and mainstream media and publishing organizations being in bed with Hillary.
Hillary campaign writing Hillary's "off-the-cuff remarks" for an
"off the record" Trump protest
“HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON - REMARKS AT CULINARY WORKERS PROTEST - AT TRUMP TOWER - LAS VEGAS, NV - MONDAY, OCTOBER 12, 2015"
This email has the full script in the attachments. Many on her staff were involved with writing scripts for the "off the record" protests.
They staged (yet another) fake protest so that Hillary could show up and deliver her "off the cuff" talking points, such as "So I have just one word for Mr. Trump: “Basta! [BAHS-ta!] Enough!” Off the record protests are the type of protests that were exposed by Project Veritas, where they pay people to go to Trump rallies and incite violence.