One Political PlazaSM - Home of politics
Home | Political Digest | Active Topics | Search | Login | Register | Help
We have ordinary people from all over the world reporting information that the media simply doesn't release to you.
Read this:
 

We are not some political camp blindly advocating an agenda by following a pre-set list of bullet points. Instead, we let individuals voice their opinions and back them with facts and logical reasoning.

Among our users we have influential business owners in various industries, active and retired military, former and current government employees who share their insight and provide unprecedented level of access to information that you won't find anywhere else. Some speak anonymously using aliases, others disclose their identities (it's up to them), and we provide a way for you to hear what they have to say. Some of them only post information on our website and nowhere else! So you won't find it anywhere.

We are a community of people who gathered together specifically to discuss politics and uncover the truth behind what's happening in the world today, right this minute.

Daily, you'll be receiving our political forum digest with the latest hottest news, analysis, discussions and some things the media simply won't report to you.

Here are just some of the things being uncovered on One Political Plaza right now:

• What hurts the economy more: the welfare or the defense spending? (The answer isn't what you thought. I guarantee it.)

• Do immigrants bring more money into the economy by being consumers or do they send more "back home"? We have some hard numbers posted.

(What if we take into account the new immigrants from Syria currently headed to the US? How does that change the immigration debate?)

• Why do politicians lie? You hear people always say that politicians are all crooks. But why is that? Why can't there be more honest politicians? Or can there? (This will surprise you, as it surprised me when I found out.)

• Is the minimum wage all about the union contracts or about actually helping those at the bottom? Does it actually help? (This will definitely change your mind about the issue.)

• Furthering LGBT equality rights through lawsuits to the point of forcing businesses to serve against their beliefs. Does that violate the rights of business owners? Or does the notion of equality trump it all?

• Will Obamacare actually solve the healthcare problem in the long run, or is just a fad that will be reversed eventually? (Some interesting arguments in favor of one of the sides. Something you probably haven't considered.)

• Join in and see for yourself. This will shock you. And it's all completely FREE!

• Let me repeat that. Since for some reason a lot of people contact us asking if the membership is really free or if there is some catch: we are a social website for people who like to discuss politics and know what's happening out there. So we don't sell anything, we don't solicit for political donations, and we don't work as a recruiting front for any party or agenda. It's as simple as that.

Here is how to proceed:

Enter your name and e-mail address below, and you'll be instantly added to our political mailing list distribution. Right away, you'll get access to more thought provoking content than you could imagine. And you'll get all that for free, completely unrestricted.

Don't delay! Join the best political community on the Internet.

First name:

E-mail address:

(The next digest will be released in just a few hours. So if you don't sign up now, you'll miss everything covered in it.)

 
Invite-Only Discussions
What about those leaked e-mails.....
If you would like to post a reply, then please login (if you already have an account) or register (if you don't).
Dec 29, 2016 12:34:56   #
ghostgotcha
 
Fact #1

10 years ago, WikiLeaks became famous for exposing elements of the Bush administration and the Iraq wars, and quickly became heroes to the left. This year, Hillary Clinton is being exposed because of the unprecedented levels of corruption throughout her history. Julian Assange, who is not necessarily pro-Trump, has stated that if any controversial Trump material is found, it will be published.

Stay tuned:

 
Dec 29, 2016 12:40:14   #
ghostgotcha
 
As I continue.... A reminder:

"The further a society drifts from truth, the more it will hate those who speak it." George Orwell

Dec 29, 2016 12:45:46   #
ghostgotcha
 
Fact#3



As secretary of state, Hillary Clinton routinely asked her maid to print out sensitive government e-mails and documents - including ones containing classified information - from her house in Washington, DC, e-mails and FBI memos show. But the housekeeper lacked the security clearance to handle such material.

Hillary would receive several highly sensitive and classified information and request that they be sent to her maid to print out at home.

FBI documents reveal that Santos had access to a room called the SCIF (sensitive compartmented information facility). Santos had no clearance but “collected documents from the secure facsimile machine for Clinton.”

Hillary would also routinely forward emails to her butler/property manager Oscar Flores. Flores was a culinary specialist in the Navy who served time in the White House kitchen and then left to work for the Clintons. Flores was routinely asked to print classified emails on Libya and other matters.

This revelation is absolutely bonkers. All you need to do to access our nation's most sensitive secrets is clean Hillary's house. But Obama keeps telling us she is the most qualified candidate ever...




Dec 29, 2016 12:56:57   #
ghostgotcha
 
Fact#4



https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/25661

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/27381

“Just talked to Jackie – apparently because we’re talking about sexual harassment, the defamation risk is really high, but he hasn’t been litigious yet, so…"

"We don't have a ton on Simes, but the pro-Russia stuff ties in pretty well to idea that Trump is too friendly with Putin/weak on Russia"


​​​​

The DNC was planning to push Trump/Russia narrative since April. In this email they are talking about some obscure "former Rand Paul adviser"'s ties to Russia and plan to exploit it to further the planned narrative. However their main concern is getting sued, knowing full well that it was fake and Trump could sue them.

Just think; I am only getting started......


Dec 29, 2016 13:25:40   #
ghostgotcha
 
Fact#5

Hillary's lawyer didn't want her to run because of the damning
emails

​​

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/51094

“Do we actually know who told Hillary she could use a private email? And has that person been drawn and quartered? Like whole thing is fucking insane."

"At least we now know why Cheryl didn't want her to run."

​​​​

According to Podesta...

He thinks Cheryl Mills told her to use a private server.

He says Cheryl Mills didn't want her to run (because of the e-mails).

The same Cheryl Mills told Judicial Watch and the FBI she didn't know what a server was even though we have her e-mails asking about the server being hacked, etc. Apparently you can just memorize the phrase "I cannot recall" and you're immune to oversight.

Cheryl Mills is not really her "lawyer" though. Hillary as many lawyers around her so they can't testify against each other.


Dec 29, 2016 13:37:48   #
ghostgotcha
 
Fact #6

And the liberals want to have you focus on the Russians messing with our election campaigns?


Obama may have vetoed legislation in effort to torpedo Bernie's
campaign

​​

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/45989

“I can promise you that if President Obama signs this terrible legislation that blatantly validates Bernie's entire campaign message"

"this will give Bernie a huge boost"

"signing this bill will result in adding at least another month or more of money and attention to the Sanders campaign."

​​​​

Gary Hirshberg wrote to John Podesta about how Obama needs to veto a bill to stop Bernie Sanders' message from getting traction. (Subject: Urgent need to talk and for you to act with the WH)

He's very interested to make sure this bill can never pass and never be signed into law. It would help Bernie Sanders and that would be incredibly bad in his view.

Gary Hirshberg is chairman and former president and CEO of a notable corporation in New Hampshire. New Hampshire is of course one of the most significant states politically in the nominating process and Hirshberg really didn't want Bernie to win.

The staff promises to discuss the Hirshberg proposition of killing this bill somehow to avoid Bernie"getting a huge boost". Podesta responds to the above: "Adding Corey. We’ll discuss."

It seems they successfully blocked this bill and avoided the "huge boost for Bernie" that they were so afraid of. The original email is from an earlier batch, but Podesta's response is significant here. Yesterday we have learned that Podesta asked "where to stick the knife" in Bernie in an email chain where they talked about making Bernie into "pulp" by various attacks. And when Podesta hears a suggestion that a Bill should be stopped, using (Obama if necessary) to "stop Bernie from getting a huge boost" what does Podesta do?

Does Podesta say, that's idiotic and never email me again? No. Does Podesta say the POTUS is not your tool to try to sabotage Bernie? No. What Podesta says is "Adding Corey. We will discuss" . These people had a deep seated hatred for Bernie the as the Wikileaks documents reveal.

The bill was introduced March 1, 2016. It hasn't moved since then.

 
Dec 29, 2016 13:42:13   #
LAPhil (a regular here)
 
ghostgotcha wrote:
As I continue.... A reminder:

"The further a society drifts from truth, the more it will hate those who speak it." George Orwell


I like this one.
Dec 29, 2016 13:43:46   #
LAPhil (a regular here)
 
ghostgotcha wrote:
Fact#4



https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/25661

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/27381

“Just talked to Jackie – apparently because we’re talking about sexual harassment, the defamation risk is really high, but he hasn’t been litigious yet, so…"

"We don't have a ton on Simes, but the pro-Russia stuff ties in pretty well to idea that Trump is too friendly with Putin/weak on Russia"


​​​​

The DNC was planning to push Trump/Russia narrative since April. In this email they are talking about some obscure "former Rand Paul adviser"'s ties to Russia and plan to exploit it to further the planned narrative. However their main concern is getting sued, knowing full well that it was fake and Trump could sue them.

Just think; I am only getting started......


b Fact#4 /b br br i br br https://wikile... (show quote)

Another good one!
Dec 29, 2016 14:11:55   #
ghostgotcha
 
Fact#7

"we are going to have to dump all those emails"

​​

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/41841

“On another matter....and not to sound like Lanny, but we are going to have to dump all those emails so better to do so sooner than later"

​​​

In this email, John Podesta writes to Clinton aide Cheryl Mills​ that "we are going to have to dump all those emails" RIGHT after the famous New York Times story broke about Hillary's private email server. They realized they'd have to destroy evidence as it had been made public. The congressional subpoena came two days later.

They discussed the destruction of evidence in this email prior to the official subpoena orders, due to the fact that now that their secret was exposed, they knew they would be subpoenaed shortly, which turned out to be the next day. They hadn't got the order yet, but they saw the writing on the wall.

However, this is still illegal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(e) and 18 U.S. Code § 1519.

It's called Spoliation, which means if you don't have a subpoena in hand but its reasonable to assume one is incoming, it is still illegal to destroy evidence.

It is unclear who "Lanny" is referring to. According to Zerohedge, Lanny could be "the infamous former DOJ staffer Lanny Breuer who quit in January 2013 after telling Frontline that some banks are too big to fail, or, more likely Lanny Davis, special counsel to President Bill Clinton, and spokesperson for the President and the White House on matters concerning campaign-finance investigations and other legal issues."

This email exchange almost assuredly signals that there was intent to mislead and delete incriminating emails, something the Clinton campaign has been trying to deny for quite some time.



Hey! I am just getting started......stay tuned.
Dec 29, 2016 14:22:41   #
ghostgotcha
 
Fact#8

Where are our liberal posters on here? Are they hiding in the bushes?

More CNN collusion with Hillary's campaign

​​

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/39885

"Unless I hear otherwise, we’ll send to our friends and allies list at noon and Jesse will get it leaked to Dan Merica at CNN."

​​​

It seems as if half of these emails are related to media collusion and mainstream media and publishing organizations being in bed with Hillary.



Dec 29, 2016 15:00:04   #
LAPhil (a regular here)
 
ghostgotcha wrote:
Fact#8

Where are our liberal posters on here? Are they hiding in the bushes?

More CNN collusion with Hillary's campaign

​​

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/39885

"Unless I hear otherwise, we’ll send to our friends and allies list at noon and Jesse will get it leaked to Dan Merica at CNN."

​​​

It seems as if half of these emails are related to media collusion and mainstream media and publishing organizations being in bed with Hillary.



b Fact#8 /b br br b Where are our liberal post... (show quote)

 
Dec 29, 2016 16:19:02   #
ghostgotcha
 
Fact#8

Hillary campaign writing Hillary's "off-the-cuff remarks" for an
"off the record" Trump protest

​​

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/36003

“HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON - REMARKS AT CULINARY WORKERS PROTEST - AT TRUMP TOWER - LAS VEGAS, NV - MONDAY, OCTOBER 12, 2015"

​​​

This email has the full script in the attachments. Many on her staff were involved with writing scripts for the "off the record" protests.

They staged (yet another) fake protest so that Hillary could show up and deliver her "off the cuff" talking points, such as "So I have just one word for Mr. Trump: “Basta! [BAHS-ta!] Enough!”

Off the record protests are the type of protests that were exposed by Project Veritas, where they pay people to go to Trump rallies and incite violence.

 
          
Invite-Only Discussions
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2016 IDF International Technologies, Inc.