I posted this elsewhere, would like your thoughts as well, please...

How about your thoughts on this, please..???

Let's hope the President-elect will address it. Nullification of the Constitution is not an option despite what the cuckoo Communists want.

The problem is that this does not nullify the federal constitution. That provides that states can and do control how those voting in their state at the electoral college will vote. Many states do not specify in their state constitutions how those voting in the electoral college for their own state must vote. At a result, many states just need to pass a law to make the change happen. The vast majority of states which have passed something like this into law are Democratic majority states. They know based on heavily populated areas that are Democratic that they have an advantage in national elections even though the vast majority of the country geographically is red. This is another issue that Democrats have packaged as something that sounds good that will not be good if it continues to gather steam.

The danger comes if they are successful in getting this passed at enough traditional red states and some remaining blue states that there would be over half of the electoral college votes committed to the national popular vote. The concept of every vote counting seems like a good one, but with either system some votes will not count. There is little doubt this is a partisan effort. It should not be supported in a bi-partisan way.

There is a real chance that we have just held the last presidential election that will ignore the results of the national popular vote.

Most people believe the mechanism for electing a president can only be changed through a constitutional amendment, an extremely cumbersome process that requires the approval of two-thirds of the House and two-thirds of the Senate, as well as the approval of three-quarters of all the states. (Amendments can also be adopted by a constitutional convention, but one hasn't been held since the founding of the republic.)

But the truth is, a decade ago, a computer scientist named John Koza -- one of the inventors of the scratch-off lottery ticket -- came up with an ingenious way to institute the election of presidents through the popular vote, without touching the Constitution.

This week, as Hillary Clinton's lead in the popular vote continued to grow, the fury of her supporters over this apparent unfairness fueled huge new interest in Koza's plan.

Koza's solution is possible because the Constitution specifies that state legislatures can decide to choose presidential electors any way they want to. Koza proposed an interstate compact, enforceable through the impairments clause of the Constitution.

The compact says that every state that adopts it will appoint electors who promise to abide by the result of the national popular vote, as soon as enough states are participating to cast 270 votes -- the number needed to elect a president. Between 2007 and 2014, 10 states and the District of Columbia, with a total of 165 votes, adopted the compact.

What makes this progress especially remarkable: less than 100 people have been actively involved in the campaign to make this fundamental change in our electoral system.

Pat Rosenstiel is a lifelong Republican, the owner of a branding company and the senior national adviser to the National Popular Vote, which is the formal name of the effort. He says interest in it has exploded since November 8.

"We usually get two or three people a day using our website to send letters to their legislators in favor of the plan," said Rosenstiel. "But since the election, 100,000 letters have been sent to legislators across the country."

There is little doubt that liberals are pushing this because of their strength in heavily populated areas making it more difficult for conservatives to ever win a national election.....

vettelover; You pretty much have Moldy pegged:
"Moldy is either a paid democrat troll or he is simply a blind mindless idiot who has no ability to question what is put in front of him by the self serving global Satanist."

Moldy has both syndromes;
The Three Monkey
and
The Ostrich

By the way, Moldy. You must be a glutton for punishment;

Oh really, Moldy???
Pull your pants back up:-)

Project Veritas Action investigation:


Rigging the Election - Video II: Mass Voter Fraud
https://youtu.be/hDc8PVCvfKs


Rigging the Election – Video III: Creamer Confirms Hillary Clinton Was PERSONALLY Involved
https://youtu.be/EEQvsK5w-jY

Published on Oct 24, 2016

Part III of the undercover Project Veritas Action investigation dives further into the back room dealings of Democratic politics. It exposes prohibited communications between Hillary Clinton’s campaign, the DNC and the non-profit organization Americans United for Change. And, it’s all disguised as a duck. In this video, several Project Veritas Action undercover journalists catch Democracy Partners founder directly implicating Hillary Clinton in FEC violations. “In the end, it was the candidate, Hillary Clinton, the future president of the United States, who wanted ducks on the ground,” says Creamer in one of several exchanges….


Rigging the Election - Video IV: $20K Wire Transfer From Belize Returned
https://youtu.be/nUBrZItwVy4

It just keeps getting worser and worser!

Obama Acknowledges and Encourages Illegal Aliens to Vote!
http://youtu.be/HFuHhWCQrFM

Disgraceful!!
Obama encourages illegals to vote on live TV. Now we know what Democrat opposition to voter ID was about.

Project Veritas Action investigation:
Here is what needs to happen; investigate and certify all the small blue specks on the map. Then we might get an honest count. Paper ballots, and picture ID's from this day forward must be mandatory. America is supposed to have guaranteed honest elections.

Rigging the Election - Video II: Mass Voter Fraud
https://youtu.be/hDc8PVCvfKs


Rigging the Election – Video III: Creamer Confirms Hillary Clinton Was PERSONALLY Involved
https://youtu.be/EEQvsK5w-jY