No End To Hillary's Corruption.. Hillary's Campaign Admits Making False Claims Against Trump... http://www.infowars.com/clinton-campaign-admits-making-false-claims-against-trump/...

Don G. Dinsdale Loc: El Cajon, CA (San Diego County)

Hillary's Campaign Admits Making False Claims Against Trump...

http://www.infowars.com/clinton-campaign-admits-making-false-claims-against-trump/

Thanks for Wikileaks because our biased media are doing their damnedest to protect Hellary and her cohorts!

Glaucon

Don G. Dinsdale wrote:

Hillary's Campaign Admits Making False Claims Against Trump...

http://www.infowars.com/clinton-campaign-admits-making-false-claims-against-trump/

Thanks for Wikileaks because our biased media are doing their damnedest to protect Hellary and her cohorts!

Do you actually believe WikiLeaks is a reliable source of information? You obviously do when it supports your rabid hate.

As long as OPP participants are unable to agree on what constitutes a reliable source of information and the meanings of simple words like corruption, lie, gossip, crime and, most of all, TRUTH we will be unable to have anything more than the sharing of gossip and increasingly negative emotions.

Does anyone on this site really want a mature, useful dialogue? I haven't seen any signs anyone does.

You are one of the most highly motivated participants in the spreading of the mental manure.

This is where you say, "YOO TOO.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Many of these hacked e-mails have been looked at by I.T. experts and say with 100% assurance they have not been altered. WikiLeaks did not hack these e-mails. They are simply a publishing entity. They have recently caught Obama, Donna Brazile, and Cheryl Mills all in lies. Not that this is a shock to anyone. Be prepared for the willfully blind lemming supporters of Hillary's and her army of OPP trolls to dispute these facts.

Don G. Dinsdale wrote:

Hillary's Campaign Admits Making False Claims Against Trump...

http://www.infowars.com/clinton-campaign-admits-making-false-claims-against-trump/

Thanks for Wikileaks because our biased media are doing their damnedest to protect Hellary and her cohorts!

Glaucon

JFlorio wrote:

Many of these hacked e-mails have been looked at by I.T. experts and say with 100% assurance they have not been altered. WikiLeaks did not hack these e-mails. They are simply a publishing entity. They have recently caught Obama, Donna Brazile, and Cheryl Mills all in lies. Not that this is a shock to anyone. Be prepared for the willfully blind lemming supporters of Hillary's and her army of OPP trolls to dispute these facts.

People in politics distort the truth? I am fukin amazed. You found an unnamed "expert" who assures us that that the illegally obtained email messages have not been altered. No one you can trust more than a thief who tells you his merchandise is genuine? Wanna buy a genuine Rolex watch for ten dollars? Again, we believe what we need to believe and fifth to defend it. That is a very serious thinking handicap.

What does the gossip say the specific lies were? When I asked one of you tell me one lie Obama told, I got a list of more than a hundred things the hated about Obama, but the list didn't contain even one lie and didn't included the real reason for the rage.

Glaucon

Don G. Dinsdale wrote:

Hillary's Campaign Admits Making False Claims Against Trump...

http://www.infowars.com/clinton-campaign-admits-making-false-claims-against-trump/

Thanks for Wikileaks because our biased media are doing their damnedest to protect Hellary and her cohorts!

You think WikiLeaks is unbiased? Do you actually believe that anyone in politics would make false claims? Where did you come from, a pumpkin patch?

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

I believe this will be my last post involving you, though you are clever at getting people like me to respond back. I saw the expert on local news. I could look his name up but don't really care. You have been given myriad examples of lies by The Democrats talked about. You always proclaim anyone else's facts as invalid. You are a troll. We all know it and respond anyway. Which come to think of it makes it ignorant when responding to you. I will give you this. You are a dyed in the wool liberal lemming because one of your favorite defenses is, "They did it too".

Glaucon wrote:

People in politics distort the truth? I am fukin ... (show quote)

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

Glaucon wrote:

Do you actually believe WikiLeaks is a reliable so... (show quote)

The emails coming out have proven to be the people they involve..You also do not have those people denying their validity only the hype to spin them by the media, late in the game no less..

Those they involve have not denied because they know there are plenty more that will bury them if they try...

Mental manure ??? How about "Truth does prevail.".

If they are not those of the people they claim to be please show us how you came to that conclusion, what are you relying on and where's that proof you ask about so often..

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

Glaucon wrote:

You think WikiLeaks is unbiased? Do you actually believe that anyone in politics would make false claims? Where did you come from, a pumpkin patch?

No more unbiased than your slanted MSM totally biased liars for their own cause...
Who owns main stream media, Glaucon?? And what is their true agends???

The difference with their unbiased reporting is they are giving you the info from the horses mouth, or finger tips as it is ....

Glaucon

JFlorio wrote:

I believe this will be my last post involving you,... (show quote)

You are obviously only interested in dialogue with those who agree with you. For those who disagree with you, you take your balls and go home where it is safe to be ignorant. I thought you might have the strength and courage to come out of your defensive bubble some of the time, but you obviously would prefer to flee the confrontation than man up and grow a pair. You are pathetic and, if I get your message, you are determined to stay pathetic by fleeing with your tail between your legs.

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

JFlorio wrote:

Many of these hacked e-mails have been looked at by I.T. experts and say with 100% assurance they have not been altered. WikiLeaks did not hack these e-mails. They are simply a publishing entity. They have recently caught Obama, Donna Brazile, and Cheryl Mills all in lies. Not that this is a shock to anyone. Be prepared for the willfully blind lemming supporters of Hillary's and her army of OPP trolls to dispute these facts.

Sorry, had not reached your fact stated post, J....Well said!

Glaucon

lindajoy wrote:

No more unbiased than your slanted MSM totally biased liars for their own cause...
Who owns main stream media, Glaucon?? And what is their true agends???

The difference with their unbiased reporting is they are giving you the info from the horses mouth, or finger tips as it is ....

Who does own main stream media? Define main stream media. I find there are many media available that cover everything extreme and in between. Which of the thousands of media do you consider unbiased? It is entirely possible that you are not getting your "information" from the horse's mouth, butt from the other end.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

I just got called a coward by glaucon, the town drunk. He thinks he's so clever because he's another pathetic troll behind a keyboard. I relish debate, as you do. There are many on this site I disagree with, such as Paul, Coos Bay Tom, Permafrost, and even straight up but can see their point of view on many subjects. There comes a time when conversing with someone who is always right no matter the amount of evidence disproving them never admits they could even have a chance of being wrong.

lindajoy wrote:

Sorry, had not reached your fact stated post, J....Well said!

Glaucon

lindajoy wrote:

The emails coming out have proven to be the people... (show quote)

You swamp us with accusations and gossip, but not one single specific allegations and, at least , some evidence.

Glaucon

JFlorio wrote:

I just got called a coward by glaucon, the town drunk. He thinks he's so clever because he's another pathetic troll behind a keyboard. I relish debate, as you do. There are many on this site I disagree with, such as Paul, Coos Bay Tom, Permafrost, and even straight up but can see their point of view on many subjects. There comes a time when conversing with someone who is always right no matter the amount of evidence disproving them never admits they could even have a chance of being wrong.

I must have missed the post where you admitted being wrong about anything. You obviously defined, evidence, much differently than I do. Gossip and evidence are different.

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

Glaucon wrote:

Who does own main stream media? Define main stream media. I find there are many media available that cover everything extreme and in between. Which of the thousands of media do you consider unbiased? It is entirely possible that you are not getting your "information" from the horse's mouth, butt from the other end.

Oh for crying out loud, Glaucon, I expected rebuttal on the topic, not damn deflection from you.

Your post speaks volumes and I'll let it stay just as it is....

Talk about no one on this forum wanting to talk topics and issues, as you said earlier, your very good at it....

Sorry I bothered ....