She just doesn't recall 20 of 25 questions Judicial Watch asked her: Do we want someone like this to be out President? She was ordered by a court to answer these questions by Judicial...

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

Do we want someone like this to be out President? She was ordered by a court to answer these questions by Judicial Watch and came up with I don't recall 20 out of 25 times. She seems to be very smart and since she has been able to get by with so much thinks it can go on forever. She won't recall anything the Constitution says about the executive branch, if elected.

Look close at questions 19 - 21 to see just how far she is willing to go.

http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/clinton-claims-not-recall-20-times-oath-responses-25-email-questions/?utm_source=SilverpopMailing&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Tipsheet%2010-19-16%20(1)&utm_content=

moldyoldy

Why do you think judicial watch has the authority to question anybody?

no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun

some interesting background on Judicial Watch
Legal Team - Judicial Watch
www.judicialwatch.org/about/legal-team

Jason Aldrich is Judicial Watch’s longest standing employee ... Supreme Judicial ... to assist Judicial Watch in its many legal victories ...
Judicial Watch - Official Site
www.judicialwatch.org

Judicial Watch, a conservative ... Our legal and investigative efforts have blown the ... download this free report and help us share our groundbreaking investigation ...
Judicial Watch - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_Watch

Judicial Watch was involved in a similar legal dispute with Vice ... During the investigation, ... In 2006 Klayman sued Judicial Watch and its ...
Now Judicial Watch Points Investigators at Lynch -...
www.teaparty.org/judicial-watch-asks-justice-inspecto...

Clandestine meeting with Bill Clinton raises questions about investigation of Hillary (Judicial Watch) ... Judicial Watch cites in its ... the law or these ...
Judicial Watch's Ten Most Wanted Corrupt...
www.breitbart.com/big-government/2014/01/02/judicial....

Judicial Watch (JW) has released its list of ... Judicial Watch's Ten Most Wanted Corrupt Politicians of ... for ignoring Congress and rewriting federal law ...
Judicial Watch - History Commons
historycommons.org/entity.jsp?entity=judicial_watch

... organization Judicial Watch, rejecting its request for ... that Cheney had no legal standing to refuse the judicial ... of Investigation, Judicial Watch.
Judicial Watch - YouTube
www.youtube.com/user/JudicialWatch

... Judicial Watch hosted a panel at its headquarters ... diGenova & Toensing, LLP), Daniel J. Metcalfe (Adjunct Professor of Law, ... http://twitter.com/Judicial ...
Judicial Watch seeks an interview with Hillary...
americaswatchtower.com/2016/05/16/judicial...

Judicial Watch seeks an interview with Hillary Clinton over ... what legal standing Judicial Watch ... motions in its investigation into the email ...

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

moldyoldy wrote:

Why do you think judicial watch has the authority to question anybody?

Because the FBI didn't do its job and let her go when they shouldn't and a federal judge ordered her to sit with them and answer questions. Of course, that judge didn't know her normal answer to any question is always "I don't recall".

Of course, they asked the judge for help and FOIA is working so well. Poor Moldy doesn't know and won't pay any attention to my answer.

bilordinary Loc: SW Washington

oldroy wrote:

Do we want someone like this to be out President? ... (show quote)

When she left office she was required to give all government material back and sign off on it.
She did not and still hasn't signed off.

no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun

oldroy wrote:

Because the FBI didn't do its job and let her go when they shouldn't and a federal judge ordered her to sit with them and answer questions. Of course, that judge didn't know her normal answer to any question is always "I don't recall".

Of course, they asked the judge for help and FOIA is working so well. Poor Moldy doesn't know and won't pay any attention to my answer.

That is why I posted access to information on the procedures Judicial Watch had to do to get access.

moldyoldy

oldroy wrote:

Because the FBI didn't do its job and let her go when they shouldn't and a federal judge ordered her to sit with them and answer questions. Of course, that judge didn't know her normal answer to any question is always "I don't recall".

Of course, they asked the judge for help and FOIA is working so well. Poor Moldy doesn't know and won't pay any attention to my answer.

JW sent questions, which were answered by her lawyers, using previous testimony. Nothing new here, just JW trying to raise more money pretending that there is some new scandal. They have been after the Clintons for decades, as shown in this link.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/13/us/politics/judicial-watch-hillary-clinton.html?_r=0

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

moldyoldy wrote:

JW sent questions, which were answered by her lawyers, using previous testimony. Nothing new here, just JW trying to raise more money pretending that there is some new scandal. They have been after the Clintons for decades, as shown in this link.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/13/us/politics/judicial-watch-hillary-clinton.html?_r=0

Can you or the NYT tell me how many decades Judicial Watch has been after Hillary Clinton? Why have they been doing that?
I give money to Judicial Watch all the time and you should if you give a damn about our nation. They bring out so many things that we would never know without them, and so much of their knowledge is not about the Clintons.

moldyoldy

oldroy wrote:

Can you or the NYT tell me how many decades Judicial Watch has been after Hillary Clinton? Why have they been doing that?
I give money to Judicial Watch all the time and you should if you give a damn about our nation. They bring out so many things that we would never know without them, and so much of their knowledge is not about the Clintons.

Judicial Watch is an American conservative non-partisan government watchdog group[1] that files Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits to expose alleged misconduct by government officials.[2] Founded in 1994, it has sued the administrations of Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, and Barack Obama. As of October 2016 it was the plaintiff in more than 20 ongoing lawsuits involving Hillary Clinton.[2]

Founded by conservative attorney Larry Klayman,[3] Judicial Watch came to public attention after filing 18 lawsuits against the administration of Democratic U.S. President Bill Clinton and other figures in the Clinton administration. An early lawsuit was filed by Judicial Watch on behalf of the Western Center for Journalism (WCJ) in 1998. The lawsuit alleged a retaliatory audit by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). The WCJ was investigating the death of Clinton deputy White House counsel Vince Foster at the time.[4]
The organization received considerable financial support from prominent Clinton critics, including $7.74 million from conservative billionaire Richard Mellon Scaife.[5] This led Clinton administration officials to accuse Judicial Watch of "abusing the judicial system for partisan ends

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

moldyoldy wrote:

Judicial Watch is an American conservative non-par... (show quote)

You indicated how long Judicial Watch has been on so I guess when you say many decades you are saying 20 or 22 years.

Your information is as right as I know it all but you failed to say who you were quoting and you sure as hell were quoting. Don't you know that that is not nice?

moldyoldy

oldroy wrote:

You indicated how long Judicial Watch has been on so I guess when you say many decades you are saying 20 or 22 years.

Your information is as right as I know it all but you failed to say who you were quoting and you sure as hell were quoting. Don't you know that that is not nice?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_Watch

HAPPY NOW?

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

moldyoldy wrote:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_Watch

HAPPY NOW?

Happy? No. But you need to get started reporting your sources because it is illegal to do what you do too much of the time.

moldyoldy

oldroy wrote:

Happy? No. But you need to get started reporting your sources because it is illegal to do what you do too much of the time.

You are crazy

bilordinary Loc: SW Washington

moldyoldy wrote:

You are crazy

POS

moldyoldy

bilordinary wrote:

POS

Person
Of
Sincerity