One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
The Myth of Liberal Tolerance
Oct 9, 2016 15:15:29   #
Little Ball of Hate
 
If there’s one thing liberals pride themselves on it’s the myth that they’re “tolerant” of others. But what liberals mean by the word is not what the word means, nor is it what they practice.

The word “tolerate” means to put up with, to allow to exist. But liberals don’t mean it that way. They don’t preach tolerance, they preach conformity. Look up what these bastions of tolerance have said about the Tea Party. Look what they say about Allen West. Michele Bachmann, Sarah Palin, Clarence Thomas or anyone who dare creep outside the left-wing’s assigned box for them.

See, many liberals are, in reality, are the most intolerant human beings you’ll ever come across. They preach a “live and let live” philosophy, but relentlessly attack anyone with whom they disagree.

They can also be the most bigoted people you’ll ever meet. By bigoted I mean racist.

The most famous examples of this have been directed at Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. In 1994, political commentator Julianne Malveaux said on PBS that she wished Justice Thomas’ wife “feeds him lots of eggs and butter and he dies early like many black men do, of heart disease,” continuing, “Well, that’s how I feel. He is an absolutely reprehensible person.” And in 1996, Emerge magazine ran a cover drawing of Justice Thomas dressed as a lawn jockey with the headline “Uncle Thomas: Lawn Jockey for The Far Right.”

What was the unforgivable sin Justice Thomas committed to warrant such a disgusting attacks? He thought differently than the accepted liberal orthodoxy. That orthodoxy is where the true bigotry lies in liberalism.

At its worst, liberalism sees skin color, gender or sexual orientation and assigns a belief system, their belief system, on those people.

http://allenwestrepublic.com/2012/10/08/the-myth-of-liberal-tolerance-will-this-make-the-nightly-news-i-doubt-it/

Reply
Oct 10, 2016 05:42:37   #
crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island
 
Little Ball of Hate wrote:
If there’s one thing liberals pride themselves on it’s the myth that they’re “tolerant” of others. But what liberals mean by the word is not what the word means, nor is it what they practice.

The word “tolerate” means to put up with, to allow to exist. But liberals don’t mean it that way. They don’t preach tolerance, they preach conformity. Look up what these bastions of tolerance have said about the Tea Party. Look what they say about Allen West. Michele Bachmann, Sarah Palin, Clarence Thomas or anyone who dare creep outside the left-wing’s assigned box for them.

See, many liberals are, in reality, are the most intolerant human beings you’ll ever come across. They preach a “live and let live” philosophy, but relentlessly attack anyone with whom they disagree.

They can also be the most bigoted people you’ll ever meet. By bigoted I mean racist.

The most famous examples of this have been directed at Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. In 1994, political commentator Julianne Malveaux said on PBS that she wished Justice Thomas’ wife “feeds him lots of eggs and butter and he dies early like many black men do, of heart disease,” continuing, “Well, that’s how I feel. He is an absolutely reprehensible person.” And in 1996, Emerge magazine ran a cover drawing of Justice Thomas dressed as a lawn jockey with the headline “Uncle Thomas: Lawn Jockey for The Far Right.”

What was the unforgivable sin Justice Thomas committed to warrant such a disgusting attacks? He thought differently than the accepted liberal orthodoxy. That orthodoxy is where the true bigotry lies in liberalism.

At its worst, liberalism sees skin color, gender or sexual orientation and assigns a belief system, their belief system, on those people.

http://allenwestrepublic.com/2012/10/08/the-myth-of-liberal-tolerance-will-this-make-the-nightly-news-i-doubt-it/
If there’s one thing liberals pride themselves on ... (show quote)



To intolerant you should add judgmental, self-righteous & smug.

Reply
Oct 10, 2016 09:07:55   #
snowbear37 Loc: MA.
 
Little Ball of Hate wrote:
If there’s one thing liberals pride themselves on it’s the myth that they’re “tolerant” of others. But what liberals mean by the word is not what the word means, nor is it what they practice.

The word “tolerate” means to put up with, to allow to exist. But liberals don’t mean it that way. They don’t preach tolerance, they preach conformity. Look up what these bastions of tolerance have said about the Tea Party. Look what they say about Allen West. Michele Bachmann, Sarah Palin, Clarence Thomas or anyone who dare creep outside the left-wing’s assigned box for them.

See, many liberals are, in reality, are the most intolerant human beings you’ll ever come across. They preach a “live and let live” philosophy, but relentlessly attack anyone with whom they disagree.

They can also be the most bigoted people you’ll ever meet. By bigoted I mean racist.

The most famous examples of this have been directed at Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. In 1994, political commentator Julianne Malveaux said on PBS that she wished Justice Thomas’ wife “feeds him lots of eggs and butter and he dies early like many black men do, of heart disease,” continuing, “Well, that’s how I feel. He is an absolutely reprehensible person.” And in 1996, Emerge magazine ran a cover drawing of Justice Thomas dressed as a lawn jockey with the headline “Uncle Thomas: Lawn Jockey for The Far Right.”

What was the unforgivable sin Justice Thomas committed to warrant such a disgusting attacks? He thought differently than the accepted liberal orthodoxy. That orthodoxy is where the true bigotry lies in liberalism.

At its worst, liberalism sees skin color, gender or sexual orientation and assigns a belief system, their belief system, on those people.

http://allenwestrepublic.com/2012/10/08/the-myth-of-liberal-tolerance-will-this-make-the-nightly-news-i-doubt-it/
If there’s one thing liberals pride themselves on ... (show quote)



The "unforgivable sin" was that Justice Thomas was "conservative". Liberal policies have always been based on "Do as I say, not as I do".

Reply
 
 
Oct 10, 2016 19:19:59   #
vettelover Loc: Richmond Va
 
crazylibertarian wrote:
To intolerant you should add judgmental, self-righteous & smug.


Conceited and narcissistic should be added as well.

Reply
Oct 10, 2016 19:22:49   #
Little Ball of Hate
 
crazylibertarian wrote:
To intolerant you should add judgmental, self-righteous & smug.


My next thread will be about those crazy libertarians.

Reply
Oct 10, 2016 19:24:29   #
crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island
 
Little Ball of Hate wrote:
My next thread will be about those crazy libertarians.


I'm looking forward to it.

Reply
Oct 10, 2016 19:28:16   #
Little Ball of Hate
 
crazylibertarian wrote:
I'm looking forward to it.


Just kidding, actually. You're OK. Mostly.

Reply
 
 
Oct 11, 2016 05:41:49   #
crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island
 
Little Ball of Hate wrote:
Just kidding, actually. You're OK. Mostly.


I was joking also but look forward to being pilloried. You're OK too, mostly.

Reply
Oct 17, 2016 18:20:19   #
working class stiff Loc: N. Carolina
 
"What was the unforgivable sin Justice Thomas committed to warrant such a disgusting attacks? He thought differently than the accepted liberal orthodoxy. That orthodoxy is where the true bigotry lies in liberalism."


The 'unforgivable sin' was the sexual harassment case brought by Anita Hill. Which you chose to ignore. Your straw man about 'tolerance' is based on not understanding the issues.

Reply
Oct 17, 2016 18:30:37   #
Little Ball of Hate
 
working class stiff wrote:
"What was the unforgivable sin Justice Thomas committed to warrant such a disgusting attacks? He thought differently than the accepted liberal orthodoxy. That orthodoxy is where the true bigotry lies in liberalism."


The 'unforgivable sin' was the sexual harassment case brought by Anita Hill. Which you chose to ignore. Your straw man about 'tolerance' is based on not understanding the issues.


Who won that case? Enough said.

Reply
Oct 17, 2016 18:44:38   #
working class stiff Loc: N. Carolina
 
Little Ball of Hate wrote:
Who won that case? Enough said.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/anita-hill-matters-hbo-confirmation_us_570fb8f9e4b0ffa5937e5e72

yeah....a bunch of men who clearly had no understanding of what constitutes sexual harassment cleared him.

But more to the point: for you to base your claim of liberal intolerance on the reaction to Clarence Thomas and his hearing just shows that you have no understanding of the issues involved. It wasn't about his views but about how he treated a female subordinate.

Like Roger Ailes, Thomas would be out on his can today and working for the sexual predator running for President.

Reply
 
 
Oct 17, 2016 18:55:53   #
Little Ball of Hate
 
working class stiff wrote:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/anita-hill-matters-hbo-confirmation_us_570fb8f9e4b0ffa5937e5e72

yeah....a bunch of men who clearly had no understanding of what constitutes sexual harassment cleared him.

But more to the point: for you to base your claim of liberal intolerance on the reaction to Clarence Thomas and his hearing just shows that you have no understanding of the issues involved. It wasn't about his views but about how he treated a female subordinate.

Like Roger Ailes, Thomas would be out on his can today and working for the sexual predator running for President.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/anita-hill-mat... (show quote)


He was not found guilty. You may not like it, but that's a fact. Besides, isn't it the left who keep saying that Hillary has never been indicted or convicted? Everyone knows she's guilty, but she will never be indicted because of politics as usual.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.