One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
you only think you know and the government is Inc.
Mar 3, 2016 09:53:03   #
ron vrooman Loc: Now OR, born NV
 
y Zen Gardner

Gerald Celente has an excellent piece on the Superbowl entitled Are Americans Sure Their Flag Is Still There?

Good stuff. But I'm wondering, not just if there's a flag still there, but which one?

And who notices?

Besides the banality of this meaningless exchange and the usual attempts to polarize viewers and pretend they have some significance in the grand scheme of things, I was more taken by the fringed Maritime flag featured behind Obama during the interview. (Stop after you see the flag if you like, sickening interview..)

How many understand the significance of the fringed Maritime flag?
A whole other set of laws are in effect under the fringed Maritime flag. And we're seeing it continue to become more and more prevalent on military uniforms, police and private security uniforms, in public areas and throughout government. It's not just a pretty decoration.

It has a more serious significance than most could imagine. It's an abdication of national and personal power.

http://orbisvitae.com/ForumExtras/Images/iskamqzmkt.jpg

These young men have no idea they're property of a corporation, not a constitutional government
Under Maritime Admiralty law the corporation of the United States, not the constitutional entity, is in control. For those of you unfamiliar with maritime law and its legal implications, here's a brief explanation:

Ever wonder why some American flags, especially those in your courts of law, police stations, and even in the lobby of Walt Disney Corporation all have a gold fringe? It’s not to make the flag look more regal, but to make sure that those who are governed by the law of that institution are NOT governed by the United States of America Constitution, but by the bylaws of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CORPORATION.



The Corporation is a headless beast that strives to create profit. Profit to a laymen is money. Profit to those who control the world is control. The gold fringe on any American flag is the greatest level of desecration one could have. This goes for state flags as well. It says to the legal world that you are under the law of the Corporation and NOT the country.


Our supposedly representative government is purely a corporate state under this flag
Ultimately when you walk into a court of law, you are being governed by the bylaws of a Corporation and not by your Constitution. There are courts that decide if a matter is Constitutional or Unconstitutional, but they are merely looking out of their legal domain and into ours, for we the people, are the only body or group that considers itself under the Constitution.

Straightforward fact – yet no one notices
What is Maritime Law?

The gold fringe originates from something called Maritime Law. This was a technique that countries used back in the days of Naval fleets that needed to barter and or sign treaties between nations. Each ship flew a flag of its country to denote its legal domain. This flag was honored as the legal domain over that ship. If one were to step onto that ship, one was subject to the written and recorded laws of that flag’s country.

The gold fringe on the United States flag is a legal holdover from these times. When one walks into the courtroom or any other institution with a gold fringe, one has surrendered to the bylaws of that Corporation and NOT the Constitution. (Source)



The Corporate Takeover Is Complete
Besides our government actually being a corporation, look at the overall corporate takeover of America today. It's never been so thoroughly consolidated. Corporations have never had such full sway through their owned media and their revolving door with government via actual goverment positions and their extremely powerful lobbys.

Heads of Monsanto and other mega food and drug related corporations move in and out of the FDA approving their own products and changing laws, while banksters and oil oligarchs freely flow in and out of the Fed and Treasury Department.

Immelt and Obama walking in a GE factory in Schenectady, NY
Immelt and Obama talking business in a GE factory
GEeee, What a Team…
A perfect example is Obama's recent appointment of corporate power broker GE CEO Jeff Immelt to another "Czar"-type position to lead a new economic advisory council. Few people know Immelt's full connections. A former Fed board member, Immelt's GE was one of the largest recipients of bail out money via their well-placed subsidiary GE Financial. To insure this cozy relationship keeps up, GE spent a cool 40 million dollars on lobbying! (see here)

http://www.visitingdc.com/images/oval-office-picture.jpg?SSImageQuality=Half

Fringed Maritime flag behind Obama in Oval Office. Notice the flag artwork doesn't have gold fringe (and Masonic sunburst in the carpet and Venusian arch in window )
http://www.flagstuff.com/images/products/american-flags/indoor/full-g.jpg

The fascist corporate state is "sewn up". Literally.

"Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power."
Benito Mussolini
Postscript: More on Maritime Admiralty Law
Note: Personally, I think the apparent experiment of 'America' and the plan to build the ultimate world dominating vehicle has somewhat backfired. The human spirit is easily overlooked and underestimated by our would-be controllers, and it seems the founders gave perhaps too much "leeway" for freedom, which has presented something of a problem.

They'll keep up their programs with police measures, ELFs, chemtrails, fluoride, GMOs, food additives and precipitating social decay, but people are waking up. And fast. And it's exciting. So don't let this information get you down, it's just to understand what they've been up to and how it works and to broaden your awareness.



Here's a great conclusion on the subject:

The United States is a Corporation
or "Don't Take it Personal, it's Only Business"

(Illuminati-news.com) Yes, you read the title correctly. We are not living in a country with a government of the people, by the people, for the people, but we are part of a giant Corporation, The United States Corporation, and the President of America is the CEO. We are only the employees. This Corporation, in its turn, is owned by another Corporation, The British Crown.

"Hey, wait a minute! First of all, America is not owned by Great Britain," you may say. "That's what the War of Independence was all about; to free ourselves from British tyranny. We are free from Britain and we have our own Constitution. Our Founding Fathers helped out with that!"

If this is what you think, it is incorrect, and I will tell you why. We have never been free from Britain; the power only changed from overt power to covert power. They gave us an illusion of freedom, and they have succeeded well to keep their little secret. Thus, the Founding Fathers, who most of them were Freemasons, had no intention to give us any freedom. They worked hand in glove with the British Crown all the time, but the only way to establish a "New World" in America was to fool the people and tell them that they were fighting for freedom. This is the plain truth in a nutshell, but now it's time to back up and explain the above a little deeper…

Corporation of the People, by the People, for the People

(The following section is an excerpt from David Icke's book, The David Icke Guide to the Global Conspiracy [and how to end it] pp. 231-233. I strongly recommend this book, because it gives you a brilliant overview of how this conspiracy works. You can order the book at www.davidicke.com)

The United States 'government' is actually the United States Corporation. It was created behind the screen of a 'Federal Government' when, after the manufactured 'victory' in the American War on 'Independence', the British colonies exchanged overt dictatorship from London for the far more effective covert dictatorship that has been in place ever since.

In effect, the Virginia Company, the corporation headed by the British Crown that controlled the 'former' colonies, simply changed its name to the United States of America and other related pseudonyms. These include the US, USA, United States of America, Washington DC, District of Columbia (Samurais) and the President of the Corporation is known as the President of the United States. This is an accurate title given that one is the name for the Corporation is the 'United States'. He or she is not the President of the people or the country as they are led to believe – that's just the smokescreen.

It is the United States Corporation, not the 'government', which owns the United States military and everything else that comes under the term 'federal'. The privately-owned Corporation called the United States is the holding company, if you like, and the fifty states are its subsidiaries.

The Gold Fringe

You may have noticed that the national flag of the United States always has a gold fringe when displayed in court or federal buildings, and you see this also in federally-funded schools and on the uniforms of US troops. Under the International Law of the Flags, a gold fringe indicates the jurisdiction of commercial law, also known as British Maritime Law, and, in the U.S., as the Uniform Commercial Code, or UCC. The gold fringe is not part of the American flag known as the Stars and Stripes, but it is a legal symbol indicating that the court, government building, school or soldier is operating under British Maritime Law and the Uniform Commercial Code; military and merchant law.

For example, if you appear in a court with a gold-fringed flag your constitutional rights are suspended, and you are being tried under British Maritime (military/merchant) Law. If it seems strange that a court or building on dry land could be administered under Maritime or Admiralty Law, look at US Code, Title 18 B 7. It says that Admiralty Jurisdiction is applicable in the following locations:

1) the high seas
2) any American ship
3) any lands reserved or acquired for the use of the United States, and under the exclusive or concurrent jurisdiction thereof, or any place purchased or otherwise acquired by the United States by consent of the legislature of the state. In other words, mainland America.

Reply
Mar 3, 2016 10:08:55   #
HistorianDude
 
The gold fringe on any flag is simply a pretty decoration.

It has no legal meaning or significance. It has nothing to do with jurisdiction. It has nothing to do with "admiralty law."

Reply
Mar 3, 2016 10:33:59   #
America Only Loc: From the right hand of God
 
HistorianDude wrote:
The gold fringe on any flag is simply a pretty decoration.

It has no legal meaning or significance. It has nothing to do with jurisdiction. It has nothing to do with "admiralty law."


Wrong. You know nothing of the topic. He is correct in what he has posted. You fail.

Reply
 
 
Mar 3, 2016 11:36:33   #
HistorianDude
 
America Only wrote:
Wrong. You know nothing of the topic. He is correct in what he has posted. You fail.

Don't be dumb.

If you believe that a fringe on a flag is anything more than just a pretty decoration, show me the law that declares it actually means "admiralty law" or any other such goofy claim.

You can't just make this stuff up, you actually have to have law.

So... show me.

Reply
Mar 3, 2016 12:17:10   #
America Only Loc: From the right hand of God
 
HistorianDude wrote:
Don't be dumb.

If you believe that a fringe on a flag is anything more than just a pretty decoration, show me the law that declares it actually means "admiralty law" or any other such goofy claim.

You can't just make this stuff up, you actually have to have law.

So... show me.


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1296633/posts

Reply
Mar 3, 2016 12:18:30   #
America Only Loc: From the right hand of God
 
HistorianDude wrote:
Don't be dumb.

If you believe that a fringe on a flag is anything more than just a pretty decoration, show me the law that declares it actually means "admiralty law" or any other such goofy claim.

You can't just make this stuff up, you actually have to have law.

So... show me.


http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2011/02/the-u-s-corporation-and-the-maritime-flag-406269.html

Reply
Mar 3, 2016 12:20:08   #
America Only Loc: From the right hand of God
 
HistorianDude wrote:
Don't be dumb.

If you believe that a fringe on a flag is anything more than just a pretty decoration, show me the law that declares it actually means "admiralty law" or any other such goofy claim.

You can't just make this stuff up, you actually have to have law.

So... show me.



Whilst serving in the US NAVY, as most recruits are also taught about our flag and other flags.....again...only a frigging mental midget like you would desire to comment about things you know ZERO about...fail again for your team! BINGO!

Reply
 
 
Mar 3, 2016 12:20:58   #
America Only Loc: From the right hand of God
 
HistorianDude wrote:
Don't be dumb.

If you believe that a fringe on a flag is anything more than just a pretty decoration, show me the law that declares it actually means "admiralty law" or any other such goofy claim.

You can't just make this stuff up, you actually have to have law.

So... show me.


Historian Dude? NO! BONG DUDE? YES! YES! YES YOU ARE!

Reply
Mar 3, 2016 12:38:10   #
HistorianDude
 
Free Republic? Before it's news?

You fail.

If you believe that you were taught in the Navy that a fringe on the flag means admiralty law, you are hallucinating.

The American Legion explains:

Quote:
Fringing of the flag is neither approved of nor prohibited by the Flag Code. The American Legion considers that fringe is used as an honorable enrichment to the Flag. Additionally the courts have deemed without merit and frivolous, lawsuits that contend that the gold fringe adorning the flag conferred Admiralty/Maritime jurisdiction.


What lawsuits you might ask? Here are just a couple. There are many more.

--------------

McCann v. Greenway, 952 F. Supp. 647 – Dist. Court, WD Missouri 1997:

"Other Courts have considered Mr. McCann’s argument or arguments similar in nature or effect. Those courts have labeled the position as “frivolous”,[2] “totally frivolous”,[3] “preposterous”,[4] and “a … really unintelligible assertion[]”.[5] This Court agrees. But in the interest of killing this argument for good, and to facilitate appellate review, the Court will examine the law of the flag."

----------------

US v. Mackovich, 209 F. 3d 1227 – Court of Appeals, 10th Circuit 2000:

"First, Mackovich’s 'flag fringe' argument — though indisputably frivolous — was not indecipherable. Litigants 1234*1234 in this circuit and elsewhere assert with some frequency that a flag adorned with yellow fringe is 'foreign' and thus robs the trial court of jurisdiction. See Wacker v. Crow, No. 99-3071, 1999 WL 525905, at *1 (10th Cir.1999) (unpublished disposition) (deeming 'frivolous' the argument that the presence of a flag with yellow fringe precluded jurisdiction and 'effectively commuted the district court into a foreign power'); Hancock v. Utah, No. 98-4139, 1999 WL 288251, at *1, *2, *3 (10th Cir.1999) (unpublished disposition) (rejecting a plaintiff’s argument that state officials 'violated his right to due process by placing yellow fringe around the American flag'); Murray v. Wyoming, No. 98-8095, 1999 WL 140517, at *1 (10th Cir. 1999) (unpublished disposition) (dismissing as 'meritless' a plaintiff’s argument that the district court and a state penitentiary lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate his claims 'on the ground that both institutions display a flag with yellow fringe').[2]"

Footnote [2] reads:

"[2]See also Joyner v. Borough of Brooklyn, No. 98 CV 2579(RJD), 1999 WL 294780, at *1, *2 (E.D.N.Y. Mar.18, 1999) (holding that '[t]he yellow fringe trim on the American flag has no effect on a court’s jurisdiction or a defendant’s constitutional or statutory rights'); Cass v. Richard Joshua Reynolds Tobacco Co., No. 1:97CV01236, 1998 WL 834856, at *2 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 1, 1998) (rejecting the 'phantasmal' claim that flags adorned with fringe are 'instrumentalities of a foreign sovereign' and noting that '[f]ringed flagged jurisprudence flourishes, though frequently found frivolous'); United States v. Warren, No. 91-CR-226, 1998 WL 26406, at *1-*2 (N.D.N.Y. Jan.22, 1998) (restating the plaintiff’s position that a 'foreign yellow fringe flag' is illegal and concluding that 'one could rightly cal'” such an argument 'gibberish'); Sadlier v. Payne, 974 F.Supp. 1411, 1415-16 (D.Utah 1997) (repudiating a plaintiff’s claim that 'yellow fringe on the flag somehow converted the jurisdiction of the state court into a `foreign state/power''); Schneider v. Schlaefer, 975 F.Supp. 1160, 1161-64 & n. 1 (E.D.Wis. 1997)(noting a plaintiff’s attempt to invoke 'Army Regulation 840-10' and stating that 'flag fringe' jargon is 'regrettably familiar to … federal courts around the country'); McCann v. Greenway, 952 F.Supp. 647, 649-51 (W.D.Mo.1997) (discussing army regulations and holding that '[e]ven if the Army or Navy do display United States flags surrounded by yellow fringe, the presence of yellow fringe does not necessarily turn every such flag into a flag of war'); United States v. Greenstreet, 912 F.Supp. 224, 229 (N.D.Tex. 1996) (recognizing that a number of litigants have 'attempted to persuade the judiciary that fringe on an American flag denotes a court of admiralty' and thereby limits federal jurisdiction);United States v. Schiefen, 926 F.Supp. 877, 884 (D.S.D.1995) (concluding that '[f]ederal jurisdiction is determined by statute, not by whether the flag flown is plain or fringed'); Vella v. McCammon, 671 F.Supp. 1128, 1129 (S.D.Tex.1987) (rebuffing as 'totally frivolous' the argument that a court lacks jurisdiction because '[a] flag has yellow fringes on it')."

Reply
Mar 3, 2016 12:52:14   #
ron vrooman Loc: Now OR, born NV
 
That guy is a shill, troll, muslim, UN new world order, there are several here. I just posted the results of diligent search, case law yatayata and admin dumped it for being to log. God figure.



America Only wrote:
Historian Dude? NO! BONG DUDE? YES! YES! YES YOU ARE!

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.