Jack2014 wrote:
Bill O'Fairy has been charged with fudging the truth about his war zone correspondent experience. This is much the same as Brian Williams did that resulted in a 6 month suspension. O'Reilly's excuses are plainly circumvent and should be investigated further by Faux Snooze.
Erik Wemple
Fox Newss Bill OReilly calls Mother Jones report a lie
By Erik Wemple February 19 at 9:08 PM
Mother Jones dropped this afternoon a long story alleging that Fox News host Bill OReilly has his own Brian Williams problem in exaggerating his coverage of conflicts around the globe in a decades-long and peripatetic career. A key line in the story by David Corn and Daniel Schulman reads like this: >Fox News and OReilly did not respond to multiple requests for comment.
Why not? Because David Corn is a guttersnipe liar, OReilly told the Erik Wemple Blog tonight. Is that clear enough? For years hes been trying to get Fox News. I would never speak to the man about anything at any time. Hes a disgusting piece of garbage.
Read complete article
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/wp/2015/02/19/fox-newss-bill-oreilly-calls-mother-jones-report-a-lie/?wpisrc=nl_opinions&wpmm=1Bill O'Fairy has been charged with fudging the tru... (
show quote)
Here's the other part of the story
Bill OReillys humiliating bust: Does Fox News have guts to suspend its own serial exaggerator?
Mother Jones shows Fox host has his own Brian Williams problem. Now we'll learn whether Fox cares about "truth"
TOPICS: BILL O'REILLY, FOX NEWS, BRIAN WILLIAMS, MOTHER JONES, DAVID CORN, DANIEL SCHULMAN, FALKLANDS WAR, CBS, BOB SCHIEFFER, EL SALVADOR, POLITICO, MEDIA NEWS, NEWS, POLITICS NEWS
Joan Walsh
Bill O'Reilly (Credit: Fox News)
Bill OReilly was predictably sanctimonious about the troubles of NBCs Brian Williams sanctimony shot with schadenfreude is the best kind of high for the Fox bully. So when Mother Jones charged OReilly with exaggerating his own war reporting record Thursday night, it didnt take long for him to launch a counter-attack. He called story co-author David Corn a despicable guttersnipe and told Politico that Corn had been trying to take him down for years.
That in itself was a sign that the punch landed; normally OReilly doesnt descend from his perch in the no-spin zone to debate mere mortals on platforms besides Fox. The Mother Jones story is embarrassing, but its probably not fatal. Most of the reporting on Fox has roughly the same relationship with the truth as OReillys claim to combat zone action. I cant see him facing censure for this, but I hope Im wrong.
If you missed the action, Corn and Daniel Schulman reported that despite OReillys claims of having survived a combat operation during the Falklands War, the Fox host, then with CBS, only got as close as Buenos Aires, roughly 1,400 miles away from the fighting. Nobody from CBS got to the Falklands, CBSs Bob Schieffer told Mother Jones. I came close. Wed been trying to get somebody down there. It was impossible.
There was, of course, no combat in the Argentinian capital, but there was a raucous protest, and thats apparently what OReilly refers to as a combat operation. He also claimed he was the only CBS reporter covering the demonstration, which Schieffer likewise denies. We were all out with our camera crews that day to cover the protest, Schieffer says. Id been out there with a crew too.
Likewise, his claim of having seen combat danger in El Salvador is undermined by reporting the reporting of Bill OReilly himself, on the ground, in real time. In his book The No-Spin Zone OReilly tells of visiting a dangerous, guerrilla controlled area with a camera crew, where I quickly did a stand-up amid the rubble and we got the hell out of there.