Stupidity rules your roost one he isn't man enough to plant your size 6 pump in anyone's ads, second he has been over a year chasing a lie and hasn't proven anything other how corrupt that he still is. I have read so many of your posts and I wonder have you ever done anything in your life like completing the 6th grade. You are serntly one of the illerate Democrat shills with absolutely no knowledge of any subject for which you have posted. You may want him in prison but he has done nothing ILLEGAL like a.ll the Democrats have. And second imprisoning him would have the effect of having America becoming another Venezuela Obama tried but like everything he has started in his lifetime he failed.

Stupidity rules your roost one he isn't man enough to plant your size 6 pump in anyone's ads, second he has been over a year chasing a lie and hasn't proven anything other how corrupt that he still is. I have read so many of your posts and I wonder have you ever done anything in your life like completing the 6th grade. You are serntly one of the illerate Democrat shills with absolutely no knowledge of any subject for which you have posted. You may want him in prison but he has done nothing ILLEGAL like a.ll the Democrats have. And second imprisoning him would have the effect of having America becoming another Venezuela Obama tried but like everything he has started in his lifetime he failed.

I don't want to see Trump impeached... That would be far too good for him and beside, he would love the attention.

I've been saying this since the day Trump arrived at the White House... with Pence next in line and Ryan after that, what we need is a regime change, so best wait for 2020 and hope enough people come to their senses by then. In the meantime, Trump is the best guy out of the three to have in the Oval Office because he is so ineffective outside his executive privilege. The Iran Nuclear Deal is a great example, being a non-binding agreement, Trump had the executive authority to pull the U.S. out. If it was binding, it would have taken an act of Congress and as we all know, Trump sucks at moving legislation. Seriously, he sucks at everything outside his executive privilege.

That means pretty much everything he does can be reversed by a subsequent president. The next president can put us back in the Iran Nuclear Deal just as easily as Trump took us out of it. And he can make a tough-guy face when he's doing it too. The next president would also have the executive authority to reinstate every regulation Trump repealed. He can also replace the cabinet and rebuild agencies like the EPA. So far, Trump hasn't done that much that can't later on be made to look like a four-year error.

So all we have to worry about is the damage done in the meantime and that's other great thing about Trump's executive limitations. The president can't actually tell us what to do the way Congress can. Congress makes the law, the Executive Branch only enforces it. So Trump can't force any of us to do something without a law, which would have to come from OUTSIDE his executive privilege. This is why sanctuary cities can flip Trump the bird... legally! This is why California (which just recently surpassed the UK as the 5th largest economy in the world) can remain committed to the Paris Climate Accord despite Trumps limp-hand pull.

Nah, the best thing to do is keep Trump contained and that might be a lot easier after this November, let his economic policies kick in, so people can see where it leads and learn the lessons they must BEFORE we give them someone else to blame.

It's like I told my wife when the kids were going through their stupid stages... "Ya gotta let them make mistakes so they can learn".

Actually telling lies... Look back to his comments about the NK release of captives.. That is pretty recent and is full of lies.. One normal statement from him..

You are concerned about the time line??? Wow , that is a historical first..


It seems that it is mostly Republicans who are grousing about the “interminable time and expense” dedicated to the Mueller Russian probe. For comparison, they may wish to consider the Clinton Whitewater investigation – a process they rarely excoriate.

In April 1994, the DoJ convened an investigation into the President and Hillary Clinton regarding the failed Whitewater Development Corporation – spurred by an exposé in The New York Times.

What was supposed to be an investigation into alleged real estate fraud (there proved to be insufficient evidence), instead extended into a 4½ year probe into allegations of such things as no-show contracts by Clinton’s friend, Vernon Jordan, and the Clinton’s involvement in the suicide of Vince Foster – all of which were found to be without any basis in fact.

Desperate for results, the investigation then steered towards new-found allegations of sexual misconduct by the president – far removed from special counsel Kenneth Starr’s original mandate. This diversion proved successful, and resulted in the Lewinsky scandal and Clinton’s eventual impeachment.

And how much did the Whitewater investigation cost? It lasted from 1994 until 1999 at a cost over $80 million dollars, unadjusted for inflation.

As an additional point of reference, the earlier investigation of the Reagan Administration’s involvement in the Iran-Contra affair lasted eight-years and cost $47.4 million – also unadjusted for inflation.

So far Mueller’s investigation into possible acts of treason by the most senior officials in the White House began in May 2017 and has cost less than $6 million (as of 7 May 18). Despite its brief history, it has already yielded multiple indictments and guilty pleas: Michael Flynn, Paul Manafort, Richard Gates, George Papadopolous, Alex van der Zwaan, and Richard Pinedo were all indicted by Mueller’s grand jury with all but Manafort pleading guilty, and 13 Russian nationals have also been indicted. More are expected.

Due to the complexity of the case, including the involvement of hostile state actors, there are likely hundreds of domestic and foreign leads that have yet to be run to ground. Mueller & Co. have a sterling record of not leaking to the media. Once obtained, the entirety of evidence and the resultant indictments will be revealed only when doing so will not impede the completion of their investigative mandate.