One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Tillerson criticizes Russia and Trump fires him
Page <<first <prev 3 of 6 next> last>>
Mar 13, 2018 15:05:11   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
moldyoldy wrote:
Tillerson knew trump was and is a moron, who undercuts his people by saying the opposite to what was agreed upon.


How interesting, at the beginning you people were thinking Tillerson was POS, just like with Jmes Comey you were blaming him for Hillary's defeat....But now that he has been fired by President all of a sudden you feel bad for him........You guys are huge BSers!!!

Reply
Mar 13, 2018 15:22:47   #
moldyoldy
 
proud republican wrote:
How interesting, at the beginning you people were thinking Tillerson was POS, just like with Jmes Comey you were blaming him for Hillary's defeat....But now that he has been fired by President all of a sudden you feel bad for him........You guys are huge BSers!!!


He was lousy as SOS, but trump is lousy at everything.

Reply
Mar 13, 2018 15:24:16   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
moldyoldy wrote:
He was lousy as SOS, but trump is lousy at everything.


Then you should be happy,Moldy.....One less lousy person at the WH...

Reply
 
 
Mar 13, 2018 15:47:30   #
buffalo Loc: Texas
 
moldyoldy wrote:
Who controls that loop in your head that keeps playing debunked fox lies?


Are you saying that bitch clinton wasn't SoS when Rosatom bought Uranium One? Are you saying that the clinton slush fund didn't get millions in "donations" from people connected to the Uranium One sale? Are you saying slick willie wasn't paid $500,000 by a Russian bank to give a pep talk in Moscow and collected the $500,000 check the day after a Russian spy ring was outed in the US, taken down because one spy got too close to a Clinton donor? And are you saying the spying efforts and the money to Bill Clinton weren't seen as evidence Russia had unleashed an influence campaign designed in getting access to Hillary? Do you not think that the TIMING and the SIZE of slick willie's Russian speech wasn't a conflict-of-interest with bitch clinton, as the transaction occurred around the same time she was being asked to sign off on a uranium deal, which gave Russia 20 percent of the U.S.'s deposits? Are you saying she wasn't the quarterback of the Obama-Russian RESET strategy and the assumed successor to Obama as president? Are you saying that John Podesta, bitch clinton’s campaign manager, didn't set on the board of a company that bagged $35 million from Putin-connected Russian government fund? BTW, a relationship Podesta failed to fully disclose on his federal financial disclosures as required by law.

Are you saying that the US voters haven't finally gotten a belly full of years of all bitch clinton and her slick willie's crooked shenanigans and don't want them in any government position, much less POTUS? And you think Trumpy is in bed with the Ruskie? LOL

I don't know what fox lies your referring to. I don't watch fox.

Reply
Mar 13, 2018 15:53:05   #
pafret Loc: Northeast
 
buffalo wrote:
Who was SoS when the ruskies bought URANIUM ONE? Whose tax dodging fund...er...foundation benefited millions from that sale? Who got paid $500,000 to give a speech to a Russian Bank with connections to the Kremlin and the bank was promoting Uranium One stock? Why, could it have been ol bitch clinton and her slick willie? I believe that is right.

I wouldn't be surprised if slick willie had slept with ol putin...oh wait...I meant bitch clinton...or maybe they had a menage a trois.

Now who has connections to the Ruskies. And IF, a big IF, the ruskies helped get Trumpy elected (which they did not) they did the US a big favor. LOL
Who was SoS when the ruskies bought URANIUM ONE? ... (show quote)


I don't think Putin is that hard up. He would have said NYET to either Clinton!

Reply
Mar 13, 2018 15:53:44   #
buffalo Loc: Texas
 
MalG wrote:
Oh, you must feel so clever and proud being able to spell the word bitch. Now, if you could only think without prejudice maybe you would make sense. Are you only able to insult and complain?


I can spell a lot worse than bitch but for some reason admin deletes my posts when I do. I am prejudice against crooked bitch clinton and her slick willie. Did that insult your delicate little sensitivities? GOOD!

Reply
Mar 13, 2018 16:00:05   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
buffalo wrote:
I can spell a lot worse than bitch but for some reason admin deletes my posts when I do. I am prejudice against crooked bitch clinton and her slick willie. Did that insult your delicate little sensitivities? GOOD!



Reply
 
 
Mar 13, 2018 16:16:46   #
buffalo Loc: Texas
 
A sample of some of the bitch's idiocy:

http://youtu.be/oZgISRau9ck

Reply
Mar 13, 2018 17:42:44   #
moldyoldy
 
buffalo wrote:
Are you saying that bitch clinton wasn't SoS when Rosatom bought Uranium One? Are you saying that the clinton slush fund didn't get millions in "donations" from people connected to the Uranium One sale? Are you saying slick willie wasn't paid $500,000 by a Russian bank to give a pep talk in Moscow and collected the $500,000 check the day after a Russian spy ring was outed in the US, taken down because one spy got too close to a Clinton donor? And are you saying the spying efforts and the money to Bill Clinton weren't seen as evidence Russia had unleashed an influence campaign designed in getting access to Hillary? Do you not think that the TIMING and the SIZE of slick willie's Russian speech wasn't a conflict-of-interest with bitch clinton, as the transaction occurred around the same time she was being asked to sign off on a uranium deal, which gave Russia 20 percent of the U.S.'s deposits? Are you saying she wasn't the quarterback of the Obama-Russian RESET strategy and the assumed successor to Obama as president? Are you saying that John Podesta, bitch clinton’s campaign manager, didn't set on the board of a company that bagged $35 million from Putin-connected Russian government fund? BTW, a relationship Podesta failed to fully disclose on his federal financial disclosures as required by law.

Are you saying that the US voters haven't finally gotten a belly full of years of all bitch clinton and her slick willie's crooked shenanigans and don't want them in any government position, much less POTUS? And you think Trumpy is in bed with the Ruskie? LOL

I don't know what fox lies your referring to. I don't watch fox.
Are you saying that bitch clinton wasn't SoS when ... (show quote)


Tirst of all the Canadians who sold Uranium one made a donation to the Clintons long before she was SOS, so there is no connection except in your feeble mind.

Reply
Mar 13, 2018 19:13:48   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
moldyoldy wrote:
Tirst of all the Canadians who sold Uranium one made a donation to the Clintons long before she was SOS, so there is no connection except in your feeble mind.


Of course there was nothing to any payoffs oops, contributions to hiilarys retail sales value of our country..

No connection at all, okkkkk then, got it~~~

Reply
Mar 13, 2018 19:17:02   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
buffalo wrote:
Are you saying that bitch clinton wasn't SoS when Rosatom bought Uranium One? Are you saying that the clinton slush fund didn't get millions in "donations" from people connected to the Uranium One sale? Are you saying slick willie wasn't paid $500,000 by a Russian bank to give a pep talk in Moscow and collected the $500,000 check the day after a Russian spy ring was outed in the US, taken down because one spy got too close to a Clinton donor? And are you saying the spying efforts and the money to Bill Clinton weren't seen as evidence Russia had unleashed an influence campaign designed in getting access to Hillary? Do you not think that the TIMING and the SIZE of slick willie's Russian speech wasn't a conflict-of-interest with bitch clinton, as the transaction occurred around the same time she was being asked to sign off on a uranium deal, which gave Russia 20 percent of the U.S.'s deposits? Are you saying she wasn't the quarterback of the Obama-Russian RESET strategy and the assumed successor to Obama as president? Are you saying that John Podesta, bitch clinton’s campaign manager, didn't set on the board of a company that bagged $35 million from Putin-connected Russian government fund? BTW, a relationship Podesta failed to fully disclose on his federal financial disclosures as required by law.

Are you saying that the US voters haven't finally gotten a belly full of years of all bitch clinton and her slick willie's crooked shenanigans and don't want them in any government position, much less POTUS? And you think Trumpy is in bed with the Ruskie? LOL

I don't know what fox lies your referring to. I don't watch fox.
Are you saying that bitch clinton wasn't SoS when ... (show quote)


Wooohhhooooo you are hot, like on fire with this one buffalo.. 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👍👍👍

Reply
 
 
Mar 13, 2018 19:17:36   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
proud republican wrote:
Then you should be happy,Moldy.....One less lousy person at the WH...


Checkmate~~~

Reply
Mar 13, 2018 19:29:25   #
moldyoldy
 
lindajoy wrote:
Of course there was nothing to any payoffs oops, contributions to hiilarys retail sales value of our country..

No connection at all, okkkkk then, got it~~~


Here’s a list of all the speeches for which Clinton received a fee of $500,000 or higher, including the year, location, host and actual fee:
2003 -- Japan, $500,000 Sakura Asset Management (Japanese finance corporation) (A note: This speech was canceled, but the fee went to Clinton’s presidential library foundation);
2008 -- California, $500,000, Power Within (life coach Anthony Robbins’ brand);
2010 -- Russia, $500,000, Renaissance Capital (Russian finance corporation);
2010 -- United Arab Emirates, $500,000, Novo Nordisk (Danish pharmaceutical company);
2011 -- Nigeria, $700,000, THISDAY (newspaper);
2011 -- Austria, $500,000, Center for Global Dialogue and Cooperation (Austrian nongovernmental organization);
2011 -- Netherlands, $600,000, Achmea (Dutch finance corporation);
2011 -- China, $550,000, Huatuo CEO Forum (business conference);
2011 -- United Arab Emirates, $500,000, Abu Dhabi Global Environmental Data Initiative (international environmental information organization);
2011 -- Hong Kong, $750,000, Ericsson (Swedish multinational communications technology company);
2012 -- Nigeria, $700,000, THISDAY (newspaper);
2012 -- Austria, $500,000, Center for Global Dialogue and Cooperation (Austrian nongovernmental organization);
2012 -- Italy, $500,000, Technogym (fitness equipment manufacturer).

Reply
Mar 13, 2018 19:55:01   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
moldyoldy wrote:
Here’s a list of all the speeches for which Clinton received a fee of $500,000 or higher, including the year, location, host and actual fee:
2003 -- Japan, $500,000 Sakura Asset Management (Japanese finance corporation) (A note: This speech was canceled, but the fee went to Clinton’s presidential library foundation);
2008 -- California, $500,000, Power Within (life coach Anthony Robbins’ brand);
2010 -- Russia, $500,000, Renaissance Capital (Russian finance corporation);
2010 -- United Arab Emirates, $500,000, Novo Nordisk (Danish pharmaceutical company);
2011 -- Nigeria, $700,000, THISDAY (newspaper);
2011 -- Austria, $500,000, Center for Global Dialogue and Cooperation (Austrian nongovernmental organization);
2011 -- Netherlands, $600,000, Achmea (Dutch finance corporation);
2011 -- China, $550,000, Huatuo CEO Forum (business conference);
2011 -- United Arab Emirates, $500,000, Abu Dhabi Global Environmental Data Initiative (international environmental information organization);
2011 -- Hong Kong, $750,000, Ericsson (Swedish multinational communications technology company);
2012 -- Nigeria, $700,000, THISDAY (newspaper);
2012 -- Austria, $500,000, Center for Global Dialogue and Cooperation (Austrian nongovernmental organization);
2012 -- Italy, $500,000, Technogym (fitness equipment manufacturer).
Here’s a list of all the speeches for which Clinto... (show quote)


And whats the point to these recordings??
Im talking about all their contributions recieved from Middle Easterners, millions of dollars and for what?? The measley 5. 2 million that the Clintons supposedly donated amass 200 million collected?? Lest for forget the royal screwing Haitii got from them too!! Yea, their just so swweeeettt, bless their no hearts...

Looking over that list it simply screams of the idiots that hired him or them... Bet they regret it now.. The lawsuits filed against them for not returning funds staggering...

Reply
Mar 13, 2018 20:09:01   #
moldyoldy
 
lindajoy wrote:
And whats the point to these recordings??
Im talking about all their contributions recieved from Middle Easterners, millions of dollars and for what?? The measley 5. 2 million that the Clintons supposedly donated amass 200 million collected?? Lest for forget the royal screwing Haitii got from them too!! Yea, their just so swweeeettt, bless their no hearts...

Looking over that list it simply screams of the idiots that hired him or them... Bet they regret it now.. The lawsuits filed against them for not returning funds staggering...
And whats the point to these recordings?? br Im ta... (show quote)


You look at money donated, when most of their work is not donations but actual work, or supplies such as medical. That is why they had a top rating.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 6 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.