One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Abortionist's Work House
Page <<first <prev 4 of 15 next> last>>
Mar 12, 2018 14:43:28   #
crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island
 
Bad Bob wrote:
No no no, you and your church are contributors to abortions by not preventing unwanted conception.

Please state what your church teaches of birth control.


You know damned well what my church says about birth control.

Now, you answer my question, for once. Is the fetus human tissue or not?

Reply
Mar 12, 2018 14:44:40   #
crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island
 
Bad Bob wrote:
What does the SCOTUS about abortion Oldboy?



That's also not germane.

And BTW, Roe vs. Wade was written by Harry Blackmun, Richard Nixon's third choice for that seat on SCOTUS, after Clement Haynsworth & G. H. Carswell had been rejected by a Democratic Senate.

I believe that a right to privacy does exist by the Tenth Amendment to The Constitution but abortion is not included in it, as Rehnquist said, in the ordinary sense of the word.

Hey Bad Bob, aren't you glad your mother didn't abort you?

Reply
Mar 12, 2018 15:04:06   #
maryla
 
I'm going to take a huge risk and write as if you meant to say "SCOTUS say" about abortion. US Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia stated that the right to privacy defended in Roe v. Wade is "utterly idiotic" and should not be considered binding precedent: "There is no right to privacy [in the US Constitution]." [153] [154] In his dissenting opinion in Roe v. Wade, Justice William H. Rehnquist stated that an abortion "is not 'private' in the ordinary usage of that word. Nor is the 'privacy' that the Court finds here even a distant relative of the freedom from searches and seizures protected by the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution..." [49] Furthermore, the 14th Amendment bars states from depriving "any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." [155] The Supreme Court overreached in Roe v. Wade when it excluded unborn children from the class of "persons." [15[quote=Bad Bob]What does the SCOTUS about abortion Oldboy?[/quote]

Reply
 
 
Mar 12, 2018 15:08:07   #
maryla
 
I'm going to take a risk and assume you meant to ask "What does SCOTUS "say" about abortion. I did some research : US Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia stated that the right to privacy defended in Roe v. Wade is "utterly idiotic" and should not be considered binding precedent: "There is no right to privacy [in the US Constitution]." [153] [154] In his dissenting opinion in Roe v. Wade, Justice William H. Rehnquist stated that an abortion "is not 'private' in the ordinary usage of that word. Nor is the 'privacy' that the Court finds here even a distant relative of the freedom from searches and seizures protected by the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution..." [49] Furthermore, the 14th Amendment bars states from depriving "any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." [155] The Supreme Court overreached in Roe v. Wade when it excluded unborn children from the class of "persons." [15


[quote=Bad Bob]What does the SCOTUS about abortion Oldboy?[/quote]

Reply
Mar 12, 2018 15:10:02   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
crazylibertarian wrote:
You know damned well what my church says about birth control.

Now, you answer my question, for once. Is the fetus human tissue or not?


OK when you answer mine first.

Reply
Mar 12, 2018 15:18:16   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
[quote=maryla]I'm going to take a risk and assume you meant to ask "What does SCOTUS "say" about abortion. I did some research : US Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia stated that the right to privacy defended in Roe v. Wade is "utterly idiotic" and should not be considered binding precedent: "There is no right to privacy [in the US Constitution]." [153] [154] In his dissenting opinion in Roe v. Wade, Justice William H. Rehnquist stated that an abortion "is not 'private' in the ordinary usage of that word. Nor is the 'privacy' that the Court finds here even a distant relative of the freedom from searches and seizures protected by the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution..." [49] Furthermore, the 14th Amendment bars states from depriving "any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." [155] The Supreme Court overreached in Roe v. Wade when it excluded unborn children from the class of "persons." [15[/quote]

Justice Antonin Scalia is dead and for now so is his opinion.

Reply
Mar 12, 2018 15:21:52   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
crazylibertarian wrote:
That's also not germane.

And BTW, Roe vs. Wade was written by Harry Blackmun, Richard Nixon's third choice for that seat on SCOTUS, after Clement Haynsworth & G. H. Carswell had been rejected by a Democratic Senate.

I believe that a right to privacy does exist by the Tenth Amendment to The Constitution but abortion is not included in it, as Rehnquist said, in the ordinary sense of the word.

Hey Bad Bob, aren't you glad your mother didn't abort you?


Oh no not when anti-choice fanatics use terms like murder.

Reply
 
 
Mar 12, 2018 15:26:40   #
crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island
 
Bad Bob wrote:
Oh no not when anti-choice fanatics use terms like murder.



It's killing human tissue.

Reply
Mar 12, 2018 15:58:47   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
crazylibertarian wrote:
It's killing human tissue.


So does a tonsillectomy and a appendectomy.

Reply
Mar 12, 2018 16:03:22   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
crazylibertarian wrote:
You know damned well what my church says about birth control.

Now, you answer my question, for once. Is the fetus human tissue or not?


"You know damned well what my church says about birth control." No I don't and I don't know why you contribute to the abortion problem.

Reply
Mar 12, 2018 16:05:18   #
Kevyn
 
oldroy wrote:
Was this post intended to let us know that you don't know what human activity causes pregnancy? Do you? It seems to me that when people don't use methods of defending against pregnancy they are going against what PP has said they stand for, all this time. You leaners all talk much the same way in that you seem to think that once a woman becomes pregnant the life inside her is hers to terminate or carry through.
Of course it is, it is entirely her choice in every sate in the nation.

Reply
 
 
Mar 12, 2018 16:19:10   #
maryla
 
Yes he is dead but Neil Gorsuch will live out his position well. Rehnquist is not dead. It was an overreach. He said it.
Bad Bob wrote:
Justice Antonin Scalia is dead and for now so is his opinion.

Reply
Mar 12, 2018 16:49:28   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
maryla wrote:
Yes he is dead but Neil Gorsuch will live out his position well. Rehnquist is not dead. It was an overreach. He said it.


So abortion is legal today.

Reply
Mar 12, 2018 17:08:47   #
SGM B Loc: TEXAS but live in Alabama now
 
Bad Bob wrote:
"Wasn't that the plan of bitch Sanger? Your ignorance is showing.


Seriously? How?



Reply
Mar 12, 2018 17:13:28   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
Bad Bob wrote:
Oh no not when anti-choice fanatics use terms like murder.


What would you call it O Learned One, if not murder? Flotsom or jetsam?

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 15 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.