One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
“Supernatural and Metanatural”
Feb 16, 2018 15:00:12   #
pafret Loc: Northeast
 
“Supernatural and Metanatural”

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-0lBAk0ZPgsg/Td7YFzzoJhI/AAAAAAAAe5E/HQVpAgaERvk/s1600/Nailhole2.jpg
“Supernatural and Metanatural”
by Chet Raymo

"I first wrote about Jan Vermeer's "The Milkmaid" back in the late-summer of 2009, when the painting was the star of a show at New York's Met. I was so enchanted with the painting that I made it the desktop on one of my laptops, where it has remained ever since.

What I like about the painting is the way it celebrates the commonplace, especially the way it illuminates simple material things - bread, milk, wicker, brass, cloth, ceramic, wood, plaster, skin. We see these things as they are, but also - though the artist's genius - as part of a transforming radiance that shines in even the most ordinary things, what in one of those earlier posts I called "the isness of things that overflows our knowing."

Well, here I go again. The Milkmaid is still on my desktop, and for the last day or so I have been fixated on two tiny details - a nail and a nail hole in the plaster wall. And here is the full painting.
http://robertarood.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/vermeer_milkmaid.jpg

Our first reaction might be surprise that the artist would register such homely details, but that is the charm of the painting - the re-enchantment of the everyday. And that, after all, is the challenge of religious naturalism: to experience the mysterium fascinans and mysterium tremendum - the fascinating and awe-inspiring mystery - in every aspect of the natural world. I am, of course, borrowing these terms from Rudolf Otto, the German Lutheran theologian of the first half of the last century. Otto sought to ground the religious experience in the ordinary physical experience of things, a numinous grasp of something awesome and exhilarating behind the surface. For Otto, that something was "wholly other," a glimpse of the transcendent divine.

Mircea Eliade took up where Otto let off, and spoke of the sacred and profane. He too emphasized the experience of the transcendent in the ordinary, "the manifestation of something of a wholly different order, a reality that does not belong to our world, in objects that are an integral part of our natural "profane" world."

Both Otto and Eliade had a huge influence on my generation of seekers, especially in their insistence that religion be grounded in the experience of natural things. All of this meshed well with the Roman Catholic sacramental tradition in which I was raised. But Otto, Eliade and Catholicism saw the numinous experience pointing beyond nature. Eliade wrote: "We cannot speak of naturalism or of natural religion in the sense that the nineteenth century gave to those terms; for it is 'supernature' that the religious man apprehends through the natural aspects of the world."

For the religious naturalist, the intuition of a "wholly other" is a step too far, not just beyond the physiological and psychological experience, but into a kind of anthropomorphic idolatry. What then is it that gives the experience its numinous quality, what I called in one of those earlier posts "metanatural," as opposed to "supernatural"? Tomorrow I will try to answer this question - by reference to that iron nail in the milkmaid's wall.

"It is not easy to live in that continuous awareness of things which alone is true living," wrote the naturalist Joseph Wood Krutch in The Voice of the Desert.

The nail. The iron nail. Vermeer is committed to exact observation and description of the natural world, no detail too small to be overlooked. There is no obvious metaphorical meaning here. The painting does not direct our attention to another reality. It celebrates this reality, the one in which we live and breathe and have our being. Vermeer's life overlapped Galileo's and Newton's. He may have known Leeuwenhoek. He is immersed in the spirit of the Scientific Revolution.

But the nail. How can the experience of a nail be - dare I say it? - numinous? Not numinous in the sense of the dictionary's first definition - of or relating to the supernatural - but of the second - spiritually elevating, sublime. Experience is not passive. It is a conflation of an external object and the experiencer's knowledge and imagination. A numinous experience is one that ignites a firestorm in the brain, a thrill, a rush of pleasure, a sense of the mysterious, of beauty, of overflowing fullness.

I hold an iron nail in my hand, cold and hard. There is first of all the tactile pleasure, purely sensual. But there is more, much more, that knowledge brings to the experience. What I hold in my hand is both a human artifact, rich in history - an object that pierces wood and plaster - and an element that is unusually common in the universe for a reason that points us to the deepest mystery of what is. The Earth's core is mostly iron. There is iron in the crust, too, but iron has a propensity to form alliances with other elements and therefore hides in combination. The solar system swarms with iron meteorites. Iron drops onto the Earth from the sky. All of which takes us into the cores of stars, where the heavy elements are forged from the primeval hydrogen and helium of the big bang.
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-cmLBPSr4z3E/Td7XA4InFTI/AAAAAAAAe5A/CqIqW21yIfc/s1600/Binding_energy.jpg

Without going into detail, the above is a graph familiar to any physicist, the nuclear binding energy curve for the elements. On the vertical axis, the energy required to break apart the nucleus of an atom into its constituent protons and neutrons. On the horizontal axis, the elements, from hydrogen to the heaviest elements. And there, at the very top of the curve, is iron (Fe), mass number 56, 26 protons and 30 neutrons, the most stable of elements. If a star were to burn to its end, it would become a ball of iron. But before that happens other forces intervene, which can cause a star to explode and hurl its freshly forged elements into space, ultimately to become part of my body, my brain, and the iron nail in my hand.

The key to numinosity is to perceive the commonplace as part of a cosmic drama we only faintly understand, churning with powers that are perhaps beyond our capacity to know, to feel that drama unfolding in every jot and tittle of the ordinary, to be aware of being swept along on a unfolding tide of being, stars seeding the universe with the elements of life and mind - bread, milk, wicker, brass, cloth, ceramic, wood, plaster, skin.

A nail. A hole in plaster. As Krutch said, it is not easy to live with a continuous awareness of things. We are grateful for the all too infrequent moments of numinous insight.”
- http://blog.sciencemusings.com/

Reply
Feb 17, 2018 07:50:34   #
rebob14
 
pafret wrote:
“Supernatural and Metanatural”

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-0lBAk0ZPgsg/Td7YFzzoJhI/AAAAAAAAe5E/HQVpAgaERvk/s1600/Nailhole2.jpg
“Supernatural and Metanatural”
by Chet Raymo

"I first wrote about Jan Vermeer's "The Milkmaid" back in the late-summer of 2009, when the painting was the star of a show at New York's Met. I was so enchanted with the painting that I made it the desktop on one of my laptops, where it has remained ever since.

What I like about the painting is the way it celebrates the commonplace, especially the way it illuminates simple material things - bread, milk, wicker, brass, cloth, ceramic, wood, plaster, skin. We see these things as they are, but also - though the artist's genius - as part of a transforming radiance that shines in even the most ordinary things, what in one of those earlier posts I called "the isness of things that overflows our knowing."

Well, here I go again. The Milkmaid is still on my desktop, and for the last day or so I have been fixated on two tiny details - a nail and a nail hole in the plaster wall. And here is the full painting.
http://robertarood.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/vermeer_milkmaid.jpg

Our first reaction might be surprise that the artist would register such homely details, but that is the charm of the painting - the re-enchantment of the everyday. And that, after all, is the challenge of religious naturalism: to experience the mysterium fascinans and mysterium tremendum - the fascinating and awe-inspiring mystery - in every aspect of the natural world. I am, of course, borrowing these terms from Rudolf Otto, the German Lutheran theologian of the first half of the last century. Otto sought to ground the religious experience in the ordinary physical experience of things, a numinous grasp of something awesome and exhilarating behind the surface. For Otto, that something was "wholly other," a glimpse of the transcendent divine.

Mircea Eliade took up where Otto let off, and spoke of the sacred and profane. He too emphasized the experience of the transcendent in the ordinary, "the manifestation of something of a wholly different order, a reality that does not belong to our world, in objects that are an integral part of our natural "profane" world."

Both Otto and Eliade had a huge influence on my generation of seekers, especially in their insistence that religion be grounded in the experience of natural things. All of this meshed well with the Roman Catholic sacramental tradition in which I was raised. But Otto, Eliade and Catholicism saw the numinous experience pointing beyond nature. Eliade wrote: "We cannot speak of naturalism or of natural religion in the sense that the nineteenth century gave to those terms; for it is 'supernature' that the religious man apprehends through the natural aspects of the world."

For the religious naturalist, the intuition of a "wholly other" is a step too far, not just beyond the physiological and psychological experience, but into a kind of anthropomorphic idolatry. What then is it that gives the experience its numinous quality, what I called in one of those earlier posts "metanatural," as opposed to "supernatural"? Tomorrow I will try to answer this question - by reference to that iron nail in the milkmaid's wall.

"It is not easy to live in that continuous awareness of things which alone is true living," wrote the naturalist Joseph Wood Krutch in The Voice of the Desert.

The nail. The iron nail. Vermeer is committed to exact observation and description of the natural world, no detail too small to be overlooked. There is no obvious metaphorical meaning here. The painting does not direct our attention to another reality. It celebrates this reality, the one in which we live and breathe and have our being. Vermeer's life overlapped Galileo's and Newton's. He may have known Leeuwenhoek. He is immersed in the spirit of the Scientific Revolution.

But the nail. How can the experience of a nail be - dare I say it? - numinous? Not numinous in the sense of the dictionary's first definition - of or relating to the supernatural - but of the second - spiritually elevating, sublime. Experience is not passive. It is a conflation of an external object and the experiencer's knowledge and imagination. A numinous experience is one that ignites a firestorm in the brain, a thrill, a rush of pleasure, a sense of the mysterious, of beauty, of overflowing fullness.

I hold an iron nail in my hand, cold and hard. There is first of all the tactile pleasure, purely sensual. But there is more, much more, that knowledge brings to the experience. What I hold in my hand is both a human artifact, rich in history - an object that pierces wood and plaster - and an element that is unusually common in the universe for a reason that points us to the deepest mystery of what is. The Earth's core is mostly iron. There is iron in the crust, too, but iron has a propensity to form alliances with other elements and therefore hides in combination. The solar system swarms with iron meteorites. Iron drops onto the Earth from the sky. All of which takes us into the cores of stars, where the heavy elements are forged from the primeval hydrogen and helium of the big bang.
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-cmLBPSr4z3E/Td7XA4InFTI/AAAAAAAAe5A/CqIqW21yIfc/s1600/Binding_energy.jpg

Without going into detail, the above is a graph familiar to any physicist, the nuclear binding energy curve for the elements. On the vertical axis, the energy required to break apart the nucleus of an atom into its constituent protons and neutrons. On the horizontal axis, the elements, from hydrogen to the heaviest elements. And there, at the very top of the curve, is iron (Fe), mass number 56, 26 protons and 30 neutrons, the most stable of elements. If a star were to burn to its end, it would become a ball of iron. But before that happens other forces intervene, which can cause a star to explode and hurl its freshly forged elements into space, ultimately to become part of my body, my brain, and the iron nail in my hand.

The key to numinosity is to perceive the commonplace as part of a cosmic drama we only faintly understand, churning with powers that are perhaps beyond our capacity to know, to feel that drama unfolding in every jot and tittle of the ordinary, to be aware of being swept along on a unfolding tide of being, stars seeding the universe with the elements of life and mind - bread, milk, wicker, brass, cloth, ceramic, wood, plaster, skin.

A nail. A hole in plaster. As Krutch said, it is not easy to live with a continuous awareness of things. We are grateful for the all too infrequent moments of numinous insight.”
- http://blog.sciencemusings.com/
“Supernatural and Metanatural” br br img http://... (show quote)


Your nail, and the next mass shooter, are both sourced from behind the veil and have every reason to be capable of human apprehension. The true mystery is that the Devine rationality of the apprehender determines the experience.

Reply
Feb 17, 2018 10:02:14   #
Larry the Legend Loc: Not hiding in Milton
 
pafret wrote:
“Supernatural and Metanatural”

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-0lBAk0ZPgsg/Td7YFzzoJhI/AAAAAAAAe5E/HQVpAgaERvk/s1600/Nailhole2.jpg
“Supernatural and Metanatural”
by Chet Raymo

"I first wrote about Jan Vermeer's "The Milkmaid" back in the late-summer of 2009, when the painting was the star of a show at New York's Met. I was so enchanted with the painting that I made it the desktop on one of my laptops, where it has remained ever since.

What I like about the painting is the way it celebrates the commonplace, especially the way it illuminates simple material things - bread, milk, wicker, brass, cloth, ceramic, wood, plaster, skin. We see these things as they are, but also - though the artist's genius - as part of a transforming radiance that shines in even the most ordinary things, what in one of those earlier posts I called "the isness of things that overflows our knowing."

Well, here I go again. The Milkmaid is still on my desktop, and for the last day or so I have been fixated on two tiny details - a nail and a nail hole in the plaster wall. And here is the full painting.
http://robertarood.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/vermeer_milkmaid.jpg

Our first reaction might be surprise that the artist would register such homely details, but that is the charm of the painting - the re-enchantment of the everyday. And that, after all, is the challenge of religious naturalism: to experience the mysterium fascinans and mysterium tremendum - the fascinating and awe-inspiring mystery - in every aspect of the natural world. I am, of course, borrowing these terms from Rudolf Otto, the German Lutheran theologian of the first half of the last century. Otto sought to ground the religious experience in the ordinary physical experience of things, a numinous grasp of something awesome and exhilarating behind the surface. For Otto, that something was "wholly other," a glimpse of the transcendent divine.

Mircea Eliade took up where Otto let off, and spoke of the sacred and profane. He too emphasized the experience of the transcendent in the ordinary, "the manifestation of something of a wholly different order, a reality that does not belong to our world, in objects that are an integral part of our natural "profane" world."

Both Otto and Eliade had a huge influence on my generation of seekers, especially in their insistence that religion be grounded in the experience of natural things. All of this meshed well with the Roman Catholic sacramental tradition in which I was raised. But Otto, Eliade and Catholicism saw the numinous experience pointing beyond nature. Eliade wrote: "We cannot speak of naturalism or of natural religion in the sense that the nineteenth century gave to those terms; for it is 'supernature' that the religious man apprehends through the natural aspects of the world."

For the religious naturalist, the intuition of a "wholly other" is a step too far, not just beyond the physiological and psychological experience, but into a kind of anthropomorphic idolatry. What then is it that gives the experience its numinous quality, what I called in one of those earlier posts "metanatural," as opposed to "supernatural"? Tomorrow I will try to answer this question - by reference to that iron nail in the milkmaid's wall.

"It is not easy to live in that continuous awareness of things which alone is true living," wrote the naturalist Joseph Wood Krutch in The Voice of the Desert.

The nail. The iron nail. Vermeer is committed to exact observation and description of the natural world, no detail too small to be overlooked. There is no obvious metaphorical meaning here. The painting does not direct our attention to another reality. It celebrates this reality, the one in which we live and breathe and have our being. Vermeer's life overlapped Galileo's and Newton's. He may have known Leeuwenhoek. He is immersed in the spirit of the Scientific Revolution.

But the nail. How can the experience of a nail be - dare I say it? - numinous? Not numinous in the sense of the dictionary's first definition - of or relating to the supernatural - but of the second - spiritually elevating, sublime. Experience is not passive. It is a conflation of an external object and the experiencer's knowledge and imagination. A numinous experience is one that ignites a firestorm in the brain, a thrill, a rush of pleasure, a sense of the mysterious, of beauty, of overflowing fullness.

I hold an iron nail in my hand, cold and hard. There is first of all the tactile pleasure, purely sensual. But there is more, much more, that knowledge brings to the experience. What I hold in my hand is both a human artifact, rich in history - an object that pierces wood and plaster - and an element that is unusually common in the universe for a reason that points us to the deepest mystery of what is. The Earth's core is mostly iron. There is iron in the crust, too, but iron has a propensity to form alliances with other elements and therefore hides in combination. The solar system swarms with iron meteorites. Iron drops onto the Earth from the sky. All of which takes us into the cores of stars, where the heavy elements are forged from the primeval hydrogen and helium of the big bang.
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-cmLBPSr4z3E/Td7XA4InFTI/AAAAAAAAe5A/CqIqW21yIfc/s1600/Binding_energy.jpg

Without going into detail, the above is a graph familiar to any physicist, the nuclear binding energy curve for the elements. On the vertical axis, the energy required to break apart the nucleus of an atom into its constituent protons and neutrons. On the horizontal axis, the elements, from hydrogen to the heaviest elements. And there, at the very top of the curve, is iron (Fe), mass number 56, 26 protons and 30 neutrons, the most stable of elements. If a star were to burn to its end, it would become a ball of iron. But before that happens other forces intervene, which can cause a star to explode and hurl its freshly forged elements into space, ultimately to become part of my body, my brain, and the iron nail in my hand.

The key to numinosity is to perceive the commonplace as part of a cosmic drama we only faintly understand, churning with powers that are perhaps beyond our capacity to know, to feel that drama unfolding in every jot and tittle of the ordinary, to be aware of being swept along on a unfolding tide of being, stars seeding the universe with the elements of life and mind - bread, milk, wicker, brass, cloth, ceramic, wood, plaster, skin.

A nail. A hole in plaster. As Krutch said, it is not easy to live with a continuous awareness of things. We are grateful for the all too infrequent moments of numinous insight.”
- http://blog.sciencemusings.com/
“Supernatural and Metanatural” br br img htt... (show quote)


I think what's so pleasing to the eye is the dearth of objects 'modern'. Nothing plastic or 'techy', just a simple room with basic necessities. One question though; what's this? It kinda looks familiar but I can't put a name to it (or a use, for that matter):

It's on the floor at bottom right of the picture
It's on the floor at bottom right of the picture...

Reply
 
 
Feb 17, 2018 17:24:33   #
pafret Loc: Northeast
 
Larry the Legend wrote:
I think what's so pleasing to the eye is the dearth of objects 'modern'. Nothing plastic or 'techy', just a simple room with basic necessities. One question though; what's this? It kinda looks familiar but I can't put a name to it (or a use, for that matter):


It is a remarkably well crafted whatever, for such a simple pictorial composition. I saw that and had no idea of what it was or what its use might be.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.