One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Should President have an interview with Robert Mueller??
Page <prev 2 of 6 next> last>>
Jan 11, 2018 17:35:10   #
PeterS
 
proud republican wrote:
But then if he refuses the interview Dems will think he has something to hide!!!Either way President cant do anything right according to Demoncraps!!

And why does it matter what democrats think? Muellers report will be what it is but unless it fully exonerates Trump you guys won't believe a word it says. You continually point your finger at democrats but you are just as guilty of bias as democrats and the worse part of that is that if Trump is guilty you will be running interference for a man who committed Treason.

Reply
Jan 11, 2018 18:23:49   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
PeterS wrote:
And why does it matter what democrats think? Muellers report will be what it is but unless it fully exonerates Trump you guys won't believe a word it says. You continually point your finger at democrats but you are just as guilty of bias as democrats and the worse part of that is that if Trump is guilty you will be running interference for a man who committed Treason.
Says someone that supported Obama giving pallets of cash to support terrorism and Hillary selling 1/5 of America's Uranium to Putin.

Reply
Jan 11, 2018 18:52:11   #
emarine
 
Super Dave wrote:
Says someone that supported Obama giving pallets of cash to support terrorism and Hillary selling 1/5 of America's Uranium to Putin.



Hey Dave... were you planning to build a Nuke?...

Reply
 
 
Jan 11, 2018 20:19:19   #
PeterS
 
Super Dave wrote:
Says someone that supported Obama giving pallets of cash to support terrorism and Hillary selling 1/5 of America's Uranium to Putin.

Hillary sold 1/5 of America's uranium to Putin? You guys love Putin so what's the problem? And I thought the Iranians were going to use the money to buy Putin's uranium and build bombs? Do you think your ole friend Putin will sell them the material to destroy us?

Reply
Jan 11, 2018 21:38:04   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
PeterS wrote:
Hillary sold 1/5 of America's uranium to Putin? You guys love Putin so what's the problem? And I thought the Iranians were going to use the money to buy Putin's uranium and build bombs? Do you think your ole friend Putin will sell them the material to destroy us?
So far it's only your masters that are helping Putin.

But you know that, and your ok with it.

Reply
Jan 11, 2018 22:43:52   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
Peter,

Russia would net sell uranium to Iran for one simple reason, that being Israel. I would suggest that you study the history of the relationship of these two nations. Russia’s support of President Bashar al-Assad is not necessarily an issue for Israel.
If you are looking for a crack in their relationship, look at Syria not Iran. Russia recently supplied S-400 anti-aircraft missiles to Syria and that could unbalance the situation in the Middle East. Russia's dilemma is to increase Assad’s chances of continuing to retake lost ground and remaining in power while maintaining the status quo between Israel and Hezbollah. While Israel may be concerned about Iranian made weapons falling into Hezbollah's hands, they continue to monitor each shipment into the Heights and have thus far been successful in dealing with that issue. Naturally, this status quo could change any moment by either Russia or Israel. Russia may do so by sending its armed forces back into Syria at will, by directly arming Hezbollah, or by arming other Iranian proxies elsewhere in the region. Israel may do so by choosing to become directly engaged in Syria, by re-engaging Hezbollah in Lebanon (or Syria), or in the longer term, making good on its threat to bomb Iranian nuclear sites - particularly if Iran were to make egregious violations of the P5+1 Agreement without any meaningful penalty from the West — or if the Agreement were to expire and Iran were to ramp up its nuclear program. Any of these actions would serve to significantly disrupt the status quo ante in the Middle East.

Your more important issue... what is Russia's plans for future relationship with the US. From all I know, Russia does not want to return to the Cold War status, a warmer relationship with the US would be much more beneficial to both our nations. In my opinion, the uranium sold to Russia is a cover up.... Russia did not and does not need the uranium because the Bear has a continuous supply from Kazakhstan. Kazakhstan shares a long border with Russia, the two countries have a military pact, and Astana still enjoys the same dictator, Nursultan Nazarbayev, who is a life long Communist with close ties to Moscow dating back decades. Further, Kazakhistan has no nuclear power plants or nuclear weapons, and thus no need to hoard their uranium. If Kazakhstan has a lot of uranium, Russia has a lot of uranium. No, this pay for play is more about establishing a relationship with the Clintons.... one never enriches an enemy, but a useful (and at the time considered a shoe in) president, would be in Russia's best interest. Establishing trade opens many paths and President Putin, like our nation's media, already had killary as our newly elected President.... for more than a few years. The bottom line is, KGB men do not enrich people they fear, and especially not to obtain something they don’t particularly need.

PeterS wrote:
Hillary sold 1/5 of America's uranium to Putin? You guys love Putin so what's the problem? And I thought the Iranians were going to use the money to buy Putin's uranium and build bombs? Do you think your ole friend Putin will sell them the material to destroy us?

Reply
Jan 11, 2018 23:46:42   #
PeterS
 
Super Dave wrote:
So far it's only your masters that are helping Putin.

But you know that, and your ok with it.

Oh you don't know that Davie. The world is full of surprises; careful that you don't get caught by one...

Reply
 
 
Jan 11, 2018 23:58:32   #
PeterS
 
Pennylynn wrote:
Peter,

Russia would net sell uranium to Iran for one simple reason, that being Israel. I would suggest that you study the history of the relationship of these two nations. Russia’s support of President Bashar al-Assad is not necessarily an issue for Israel.
If you are looking for a crack in their relationship, look at Syria not Iran. Russia recently supplied S-400 anti-aircraft missiles to Syria and that could unbalance the situation in the Middle East. Russia's dilemma is to increase Assad’s chances of continuing to retake lost ground and remaining in power while maintaining the status quo between Israel and Hezbollah. While Israel may be concerned about Iranian made weapons falling into Hezbollah's hands, they continue to monitor each shipment into the Heights and have thus far been successful in dealing with that issue. Naturally, this status quo could change any moment by either Russia or Israel. Russia may do so by sending its armed forces back into Syria at will, by directly arming Hezbollah, or by arming other Iranian proxies elsewhere in the region. Israel may do so by choosing to become directly engaged in Syria, by re-engaging Hezbollah in Lebanon (or Syria), or in the longer term, making good on its threat to bomb Iranian nuclear sites - particularly if Iran were to make egregious violations of the P5+1 Agreement without any meaningful penalty from the West — or if the Agreement were to expire and Iran were to ramp up its nuclear program. Any of these actions would serve to significantly disrupt the status quo ante in the Middle East.

Your more important issue... what is Russia's plans for future relationship with the US. From all I know, Russia does not want to return to the Cold War status, a warmer relationship with the US would be much more beneficial to both our nations. In my opinion, the uranium sold to Russia is a cover up.... Russia did not and does not need the uranium because the Bear has a continuous supply from Kazakhstan. Kazakhstan shares a long border with Russia, the two countries have a military pact, and Astana still enjoys the same dictator, Nursultan Nazarbayev, who is a life long Communist with close ties to Moscow dating back decades. Further, Kazakhistan has no nuclear power plants or nuclear weapons, and thus no need to hoard their uranium. If Kazakhstan has a lot of uranium, Russia has a lot of uranium. No, this pay for play is more about establishing a relationship with the Clintons.... one never enriches an enemy, but a useful (and at the time considered a shoe in) president, would be in Russia's best interest. Establishing trade opens many paths and President Putin, like our nation's media, already had killary as our newly elected President.... for more than a few years. The bottom line is, KGB men do not enrich people they fear, and especially not to obtain something they don’t particularly need.
Peter, br br Russia would net sell uranium to Ira... (show quote)

I was being facetious Pennylynn. Hillary selling uranium to the Russians has been debunked so many times that it's no longer fun even mentioning. I don't know if you've heard of Shep Smith of Fox News but he gives a very concise review of the Uranium One controversy and it you have a few minutes it might be worth listening to. I know Davie won't listen; I'm assuming you're not as closed minded as he is...

http://video.foxnews.com/v/5646426075001/?playlist_id=2694949843001#sp=show-clips

Reply
Jan 12, 2018 00:05:53   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
PeterS wrote:
Oh you don't know that Davie. The world is full of surprises; careful that you don't get caught by one...


What we know for sure is that you're ok with Democrats supporting terrorists and selling our Uranium to Putin.

We know that for sure.

Reply
Jan 12, 2018 00:30:48   #
PeterS
 
Super Dave wrote:
What we know for sure is that you're ok with Democrats supporting terrorists and selling our Uranium to Putin.

We know that for sure.

And how do you know that for sure Davie? How is Putin able to export uranium mined in the United States? And you still haven't stated why you would care if Putin has our uranium. After all Putin and Trump are best buds. What's his is ours and what's ours is his right. It's us democrats who messed up the relationship between the two--insisting on sanctions--can you imagine. So again, what do you care what Putin buys from us--it's called a free market remember--sure as hell don't want to regulate it! That's what those commies and socialists do remember. All Putin is doing is creating jobs here in the good ole US of A. That's what you guys want right--jobs? Well Puttie is hard at work creating them and they pay above minimum wage too.

As for supporting terrorists--do you mean the kind that murder people at a concert by the dozens and wound they by the hundreds or the kind of terrorist that walks into a Church and blows everyone away? No I don't support them Davie. As a matter of fact if it were up to us they wouldn't be able to buy the weapons used to commit the acts of terror that most of the terrorists in the country use. Of course you have no problem if they buy guys do you Davie. Better they be able to buy a gun then you not to be able to buy a guy right! After all, you never know when Obama will sic the government on you do you and lock you up in a FEMA camp right. Gotta be prepared even if terrorists run amok correct!

Reply
Jan 12, 2018 01:07:23   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
Thank you for the link, it was interesting. It is true that killary was not able to approve sale of uranium to any foreign country, it does require a panel. However, we it is also true that Rosatom, a state-controlled agency that runs all aspects of Russian nuclear power, purchased a controlling interest in a Canadian mining company named Uranium One. This firm then owned, and still owns, uranium mining rights in the United States. And if you read what I wrote, Russia did not need to make a purchases of uranium... it simply has an unending supply. The issue, in my mind, was the sizable contributions to the Clinton Foundation from members of the original investors in Uranium One, prior to its sale to Rosatom. Couple this with the "oversight" of not reporting those contributions. And the fact that former president Clinton earned $500,000 for speaking at a Moscow conference organized by a Russian investment bank after the Rosatom-Uranium One deal was announced, but before it passed muster with the US Committee on Foreign Investments. And that brings me back to my point.... why would Russia buy uranium if they already have an abundance? We do know that Vadim Mikerin, was sentenced to 48 months in prison for money laundering. And who was Mikerin? Well, at the time this deal was made he was Russian nuclear industry’s point man in the US, a director of a subsidiary of Russia’s State Atomic Energy Corporation. One could made the jump from a innocence of the Secretary of State who had absolutely no power to approve or disapprove the deal...to the Clintons and their foundation was possibly one of the "washing machines" for money coming out of Russia. And how would this fit in with President Putin... well, if you believe that Russia was going to blackmail Trump for "golden flows" then how much of a hammer over the head of a president who was tied into money laundering?

My mind is open... I will gladly watch, listen, or read any articles you or other may present. I trust that you too will put away any biasness and return the courtesy.

PeterS wrote:
I was being facetious Pennylynn. Hillary selling uranium to the Russians has been debunked so many times that it's no longer fun even mentioning. I don't know if you've heard of Shep Smith of Fox News but he gives a very concise review of the Uranium One controversy and it you have a few minutes it might be worth listening to. I know Davie won't listen; I'm assuming you're not as closed minded as he is...

http://video.foxnews.com/v/5646426075001/?playlist_id=2694949843001#sp=show-clips

Reply
 
 
Jan 12, 2018 05:02:23   #
Hemiman Loc: Communist California
 
Super Dave wrote:
What we know for sure is that you're ok with Democrats supporting terrorists and selling our Uranium to Putin.

We know that for sure.


And he is a Muslim.

Reply
Jan 12, 2018 05:55:46   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
PeterS wrote:
And how do you know that for sure Davie? How is Putin able to export uranium mined in the United States? And you still haven't stated why you would care if Putin has our uranium. After all Putin and Trump are best buds. What's his is ours and what's ours is his right. It's us democrats who messed up the relationship between the two--insisting on sanctions--can you imagine. So again, what do you care what Putin buys from us--it's called a free market remember--sure as hell don't want to regulate it! That's what those commies and socialists do remember. All Putin is doing is creating jobs here in the good ole US of A. That's what you guys want right--jobs? Well Puttie is hard at work creating them and they pay above minimum wage too.

As for supporting terrorists--do you mean the kind that murder people at a concert by the dozens and wound they by the hundreds or the kind of terrorist that walks into a Church and blows everyone away? No I don't support them Davie. As a matter of fact if it were up to us they wouldn't be able to buy the weapons used to commit the acts of terror that most of the terrorists in the country use. Of course you have no problem if they buy guys do you Davie. Better they be able to buy a gun then you not to be able to buy a guy right! After all, you never know when Obama will sic the government on you do you and lock you up in a FEMA camp right. Gotta be prepared even if terrorists run amok correct!
And how do you know that for sure Davie? How is Pu... (show quote)


Aww... I see you're trying to weasel out of your God-King's support of the #1 State sponsor of terror....

You have to make a fool of yourself because you're stuck on stupid.

If you had any credibility you would be opposed to Obama sending pallet loads of cash to help terrorists, and you would be opposed to a deal that gives Putin 1/5 of America's Uranium while the only Americans to benefit are all named Clinton.

But you can't oppose those. You're not allowed. You're a slave to the Democrat Party, and you live on your knees.

Reply
Jan 12, 2018 06:04:39   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
Pennylynn wrote:
Thank you for the link, it was interesting. It is true that killary was not able to approve sale of uranium to any foreign country, it does require a panel. However, we it is also true that Rosatom, a state-controlled agency that runs all aspects of Russian nuclear power, purchased a controlling interest in a Canadian mining company named Uranium One. This firm then owned, and still owns, uranium mining rights in the United States. And if you read what I wrote, Russia did not need to make a purchases of uranium... it simply has an unending supply. The issue, in my mind, was the sizable contributions to the Clinton Foundation from members of the original investors in Uranium One, prior to its sale to Rosatom. Couple this with the "oversight" of not reporting those contributions. And the fact that former president Clinton earned $500,000 for speaking at a Moscow conference organized by a Russian investment bank after the Rosatom-Uranium One deal was announced, but before it passed muster with the US Committee on Foreign Investments. And that brings me back to my point.... why would Russia buy uranium if they already have an abundance? We do know that Vadim Mikerin, was sentenced to 48 months in prison for money laundering. And who was Mikerin? Well, at the time this deal was made he was Russian nuclear industry’s point man in the US, a director of a subsidiary of Russia’s State Atomic Energy Corporation. One could made the jump from a innocence of the Secretary of State who had absolutely no power to approve or disapprove the deal...to the Clintons and their foundation was possibly one of the "washing machines" for money coming out of Russia. And how would this fit in with President Putin... well, if you believe that Russia was going to blackmail Trump for "golden flows" then how much of a hammer over the head of a president who was tied into money laundering?

My mind is open... I will gladly watch, listen, or read any articles you or other may present. I trust that you too will put away any biasness and return the courtesy.
Thank you for the link, it was interesting. It is... (show quote)
The State Department under Hillary approved the Uranium One deal, and Hillary's foundation got over $150,000,000.00 from Russian Nuclear Oligarchs, who also gave Bill Clinton personally $500,000.00 for a speech in a language they couldn't understand.

There isn't a lot of ways to spin this.

Hillary said that when 1/5 of America's Uranium was given to Putin in a deal that benefited no American (not named Clinton), but benefited Putin greatly, that nobody in her the US government including her own State Department bothered to mention it to her and she was too ignorant of world events to figure it out for herself.

Do you really think the same people that benefited from the Uranium One deal just happened to give that much money to Bill and the Clinton Foundation because they wanted to "Help the Children" or something, and Hillary really didn't know what was going on? Would you join a crowd that collectively pretends to be that stupid?

Reply
Jan 12, 2018 06:47:33   #
silvereagle
 
How can someone be charged with a crime they didn't do? It happens all the time.Mule deer will use a trick question.This shows mule deer has nothing,nothing .He will speculate,manipulate ,call it true when it's not.Our jails are full of innocent people.Our lawyers are corrupt as any politician in Washington.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 6 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.