EMP Attack Would Be Devastating to US - Obama showed the Chinese how.
A War with China?
Researched by Pastor Gary Boyd
China has pretended to support our position on N. Korea. now they have done a dramatic flip flop. It is 1950 all over again. We could very easily be fighting the Chinese as well as the N. Koreans.
The world was shocked when it learned that North Korea launched an ICBM. North Korea has fired its highest-ever intercontinental ballistic missile and poses a worldwide threat, US Secretary of Defense James Mattis has said.
The missile, launched early on Wednesday, landed in Japanese waters. It reached an altitude of 4,500km (2,800 miles) and flew 960km, according to South Koreaâs military.
It was the latest in a series of weapons tests that has raised tensions. Pyongyang last launched a ballistic missile in September.
It also conducted its sixth nuclear test that month. North Korea has continued to develop its nuclear and missile program despite global condemnation and sanctions.
The UN Security Council is due to convene an emergency session to discuss the latest test.
Technologically, this was a significant step forward for the North Koreans. However, is the North Koreans tempting fate, or is this thinly veiled Chinese aggression tied to various free trade agreements.
The Significance of the High Altitutde ICBM
I have learned that an EMP attack would come from a high altitude nuclear burst above the United States. Conversely, a nuclear attack from an ICBM missile would have some elevation in its delivery arc (eg perhaps as high as 150 miles), but the trajectory of an incoming ICBM designed to produce and EMP effect would have to achieve a higher orbit. American defense officials are aware of this. However, do not expect to hear a word about this in the media.
The launch of a North Korean ICBM that achieved a height of 2800 miles speaks to the fact that they are intent in producing high altitude burst resulting in the destruction of most of the grid and electronics within the United States.
North Korea Is Chinaâs Puppet
When China says âjumpâ, the North Koreans respond with âHow high.â The North Korea leaders do not sneeze without the Chinese providing the tissue. If China did not want NK firing ICBMâs, they never would.
NK has now developed the ability to deliver nukes anywhere inside the United States. More importantly, they can deliver an EMP attack through the setting off of a high altitude blast.
Why would China be invested in the North Koreans ramping up their intimidation? The answer is simple and it has to do with free trade. Trump has gotten the best of the Chinese in the latest round of talks regarding trade. China was more in the next round and I think it is likely that the Chinese are playing the NK nuclear/EMP card in order to gain some concessions from Trump when it comes to trade agreements.
To those that think an EMP is no big deal, please look the following paragraphs.
The Areas You Donât Want to Be When an EMP Is Discharged
As James Wesley Rawles pointed out to me in a recent interview, there are several areas that would be very unfortunate for you to be at when an EMP is discharged.
Places not to be:
Being in one of the 4,000 planes that would be flying, would be fatal.
Being in the hospital on life-sustaining equipment.
Being trapped in a high rise building elevator. This would become your tomb.
Being on the highway at night when all the lights and go out as well as most car engines. There would be multiple and devastating accidents.
Being more that 10 miles from home in harsh weather. Do you have a bug-in bag? Consider a fold up bike.
The list is more extensive, but you get the idea.
The Deep State Alliance with North Korea
A few years ago, Congressman Franks (AZ) wrote a very pointed and blunt letter to Frederick Gorbet, the chairman of the Board of Trustees for the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC). Franks jointly addressed his letter to Gary Cauley, the President and CEO of the same organization.
In the letter, Congressman Franks sounds like a man who has had enough as he is as mad as hell and is not going to take it anymore. Franks obviously sees the dire threat posed by an EMP grid take down and is increasingly frustrated with the âPollyannaâsâ who are acting irresponsibly in the face of the threat, especially when some of these people are in positions of responsibility when it comes to protecting the public from a prolonged and catastrophic blackout.
In the letter, Franks points out that National Geographic aired a docudrama entitled American Blackout. The film showed what our countrymen and nation would experience in the event of a cyber attack on the US bulk power distribution system and a resulting shut down of the grid for 10 days. If anything, the serious hardships, dislocation, physical destruction, deaths and societal breakdown portrayed in this docudrama are likely understated.â In my last article, a Franksâ video was played in which he said an EMP take down of the grid would result in 60% of Americans dying as a result of the event. The Naval War College puts the death rate at 90%.
Franks goes on to chastise NERC for the statements of one of its member electric utilities, the Kissimmee Utility Authority which issued a statement, in response to the film, which clearly chastised the National Geographic docudrama by stating that the threats were overblown. Franks made it clear in his letter, that if anything, the threats of the docudrama were grossly understated! Further, Franks went on to say that the time frame which encompassed the blackout, two weeks, was an additional understatement and âthat a sustained blackout would be catastrophic.â Franks also accuses NERC and its member utilities of historically under-representing the seriousness of the threat of an EMP attack and a subsequent power grid take down.
He went on to say that NERC, was being â dismissiveâ of his claims and that âthe blackout possibilities represents a catastrophic threat to the United States of widespread power loss for potentially months or years that could result in American society tearing itself apart and a horrific loss of human life.â
Hereâs where Frankâs frustration becomes notable. Despite all of the protests from Franks, his reasonable claims fell on deaf ears. Obama at the time snubbed Frankâs efforts at every turn. Obama went so far as to allow the Russians and Chinese observe the Grid EX drills which practiced a grid down scenario. In other words, we showed them how to bring down our grids. We always knew that Obama was a traitor. However, this takes the proverbial cake.
Conclusion
For the price of one B-1 bomber, Obama, on behalf of the Deep State, refused to act to protect America from such an attack. Since the two most likely states who will carry out this attack, Iran and North Korea, we should consider an attack by these states upon the United States to be an attack from their dominant allies, Russia and China. In the present set of events, we are talking about China, North Korea (puppet) and the United States.
The elite will survive. Will You?
ziggy88 wrote:
A War with China?
Researched by Pastor Gary Boyd
China has pretended to support our position on N. Korea. now they have done a dramatic flip flop. It is 1950 all over again. We could very easily be fighting the Chinese as well as the N. Koreans.
The world was shocked when it learned that North Korea launched an ICBM. North Korea has fired its highest-ever intercontinental ballistic missile and poses a worldwide threat, US Secretary of Defense James Mattis has said.
The missile, launched early on Wednesday, landed in Japanese waters. It reached an altitude of 4,500km (2,800 miles) and flew 960km, according to South Koreaâs military.
It was the latest in a series of weapons tests that has raised tensions. Pyongyang last launched a ballistic missile in September.
It also conducted its sixth nuclear test that month. North Korea has continued to develop its nuclear and missile program despite global condemnation and sanctions.
The UN Security Council is due to convene an emergency session to discuss the latest test.
Technologically, this was a significant step forward for the North Koreans. However, is the North Koreans tempting fate, or is this thinly veiled Chinese aggression tied to various free trade agreements.
The Significance of the High Altitutde ICBM
I have learned that an EMP attack would come from a high altitude nuclear burst above the United States. Conversely, a nuclear attack from an ICBM missile would have some elevation in its delivery arc (eg perhaps as high as 150 miles), but the trajectory of an incoming ICBM designed to produce and EMP effect would have to achieve a higher orbit. American defense officials are aware of this. However, do not expect to hear a word about this in the media.
The launch of a North Korean ICBM that achieved a height of 2800 miles speaks to the fact that they are intent in producing high altitude burst resulting in the destruction of most of the grid and electronics within the United States.
North Korea Is Chinaâs Puppet
When China says âjumpâ, the North Koreans respond with âHow high.â The North Korea leaders do not sneeze without the Chinese providing the tissue. If China did not want NK firing ICBMâs, they never would.
NK has now developed the ability to deliver nukes anywhere inside the United States. More importantly, they can deliver an EMP attack through the setting off of a high altitude blast.
Why would China be invested in the North Koreans ramping up their intimidation? The answer is simple and it has to do with free trade. Trump has gotten the best of the Chinese in the latest round of talks regarding trade. China was more in the next round and I think it is likely that the Chinese are playing the NK nuclear/EMP card in order to gain some concessions from Trump when it comes to trade agreements.
To those that think an EMP is no big deal, please look the following paragraphs.
The Areas You Donât Want to Be When an EMP Is Discharged
As James Wesley Rawles pointed out to me in a recent interview, there are several areas that would be very unfortunate for you to be at when an EMP is discharged.
Places not to be:
Being in one of the 4,000 planes that would be flying, would be fatal.
Being in the hospital on life-sustaining equipment.
Being trapped in a high rise building elevator. This would become your tomb.
Being on the highway at night when all the lights and go out as well as most car engines. There would be multiple and devastating accidents.
Being more that 10 miles from home in harsh weather. Do you have a bug-in bag? Consider a fold up bike.
The list is more extensive, but you get the idea.
The Deep State Alliance with North Korea
A few years ago, Congressman Franks (AZ) wrote a very pointed and blunt letter to Frederick Gorbet, the chairman of the Board of Trustees for the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC). Franks jointly addressed his letter to Gary Cauley, the President and CEO of the same organization.
In the letter, Congressman Franks sounds like a man who has had enough as he is as mad as hell and is not going to take it anymore. Franks obviously sees the dire threat posed by an EMP grid take down and is increasingly frustrated with the âPollyannaâsâ who are acting irresponsibly in the face of the threat, especially when some of these people are in positions of responsibility when it comes to protecting the public from a prolonged and catastrophic blackout.
In the letter, Franks points out that National Geographic aired a docudrama entitled American Blackout. The film showed what our countrymen and nation would experience in the event of a cyber attack on the US bulk power distribution system and a resulting shut down of the grid for 10 days. If anything, the serious hardships, dislocation, physical destruction, deaths and societal breakdown portrayed in this docudrama are likely understated.â In my last article, a Franksâ video was played in which he said an EMP take down of the grid would result in 60% of Americans dying as a result of the event. The Naval War College puts the death rate at 90%.
Franks goes on to chastise NERC for the statements of one of its member electric utilities, the Kissimmee Utility Authority which issued a statement, in response to the film, which clearly chastised the National Geographic docudrama by stating that the threats were overblown. Franks made it clear in his letter, that if anything, the threats of the docudrama were grossly understated! Further, Franks went on to say that the time frame which encompassed the blackout, two weeks, was an additional understatement and âthat a sustained blackout would be catastrophic.â Franks also accuses NERC and its member utilities of historically under-representing the seriousness of the threat of an EMP attack and a subsequent power grid take down.
He went on to say that NERC, was being â dismissiveâ of his claims and that âthe blackout possibilities represents a catastrophic threat to the United States of widespread power loss for potentially months or years that could result in American society tearing itself apart and a horrific loss of human life.â
Hereâs where Frankâs frustration becomes notable. Despite all of the protests from Franks, his reasonable claims fell on deaf ears. Obama at the time snubbed Frankâs efforts at every turn. Obama went so far as to allow the Russians and Chinese observe the Grid EX drills which practiced a grid down scenario. In other words, we showed them how to bring down our grids. We always knew that Obama was a traitor. However, this takes the proverbial cake.
Conclusion
For the price of one B-1 bomber, Obama, on behalf of the Deep State, refused to act to protect America from such an attack. Since the two most likely states who will carry out this attack, Iran and North Korea, we should consider an attack by these states upon the United States to be an attack from their dominant allies, Russia and China. In the present set of events, we are talking about China, North Korea (puppet) and the United States.
The elite will survive. Will You?
A War with China? br Researched by Pastor Gary Boy... (
show quote)
The Muslim FRAUD couldn't care less.
ziggy88 wrote:
A War with China?
Researched by Pastor Gary Boyd
China has pretended to support our position on N. Korea. now they have done a dramatic flip flop. It is 1950 all over again. We could very easily be fighting the Chinese as well as the N. Koreans.
The world was shocked when it learned that North Korea launched an ICBM. North Korea has fired its highest-ever intercontinental ballistic missile and poses a worldwide threat, US Secretary of Defense James Mattis has said.
The missile, launched early on Wednesday, landed in Japanese waters. It reached an altitude of 4,500km (2,800 miles) and flew 960km, according to South Koreaâs military.
It was the latest in a series of weapons tests that has raised tensions. Pyongyang last launched a ballistic missile in September.
It also conducted its sixth nuclear test that month. North Korea has continued to develop its nuclear and missile program despite global condemnation and sanctions.
The UN Security Council is due to convene an emergency session to discuss the latest test.
Technologically, this was a significant step forward for the North Koreans. However, is the North Koreans tempting fate, or is this thinly veiled Chinese aggression tied to various free trade agreements.
The Significance of the High Altitutde ICBM
I have learned that an EMP attack would come from a high altitude nuclear burst above the United States. Conversely, a nuclear attack from an ICBM missile would have some elevation in its delivery arc (eg perhaps as high as 150 miles), but the trajectory of an incoming ICBM designed to produce and EMP effect would have to achieve a higher orbit. American defense officials are aware of this. However, do not expect to hear a word about this in the media.
The launch of a North Korean ICBM that achieved a height of 2800 miles speaks to the fact that they are intent in producing high altitude burst resulting in the destruction of most of the grid and electronics within the United States.
North Korea Is Chinaâs Puppet
When China says âjumpâ, the North Koreans respond with âHow high.â The North Korea leaders do not sneeze without the Chinese providing the tissue. If China did not want NK firing ICBMâs, they never would.
NK has now developed the ability to deliver nukes anywhere inside the United States. More importantly, they can deliver an EMP attack through the setting off of a high altitude blast.
Why would China be invested in the North Koreans ramping up their intimidation? The answer is simple and it has to do with free trade. Trump has gotten the best of the Chinese in the latest round of talks regarding trade. China was more in the next round and I think it is likely that the Chinese are playing the NK nuclear/EMP card in order to gain some concessions from Trump when it comes to trade agreements.
To those that think an EMP is no big deal, please look the following paragraphs.
The Areas You Donât Want to Be When an EMP Is Discharged
As James Wesley Rawles pointed out to me in a recent interview, there are several areas that would be very unfortunate for you to be at when an EMP is discharged.
Places not to be:
Being in one of the 4,000 planes that would be flying, would be fatal.
Being in the hospital on life-sustaining equipment.
Being trapped in a high rise building elevator. This would become your tomb.
Being on the highway at night when all the lights and go out as well as most car engines. There would be multiple and devastating accidents.
Being more that 10 miles from home in harsh weather. Do you have a bug-in bag? Consider a fold up bike.
The list is more extensive, but you get the idea.
The Deep State Alliance with North Korea
A few years ago, Congressman Franks (AZ) wrote a very pointed and blunt letter to Frederick Gorbet, the chairman of the Board of Trustees for the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC). Franks jointly addressed his letter to Gary Cauley, the President and CEO of the same organization.
In the letter, Congressman Franks sounds like a man who has had enough as he is as mad as hell and is not going to take it anymore. Franks obviously sees the dire threat posed by an EMP grid take down and is increasingly frustrated with the âPollyannaâsâ who are acting irresponsibly in the face of the threat, especially when some of these people are in positions of responsibility when it comes to protecting the public from a prolonged and catastrophic blackout.
In the letter, Franks points out that National Geographic aired a docudrama entitled American Blackout. The film showed what our countrymen and nation would experience in the event of a cyber attack on the US bulk power distribution system and a resulting shut down of the grid for 10 days. If anything, the serious hardships, dislocation, physical destruction, deaths and societal breakdown portrayed in this docudrama are likely understated.â In my last article, a Franksâ video was played in which he said an EMP take down of the grid would result in 60% of Americans dying as a result of the event. The Naval War College puts the death rate at 90%.
Franks goes on to chastise NERC for the statements of one of its member electric utilities, the Kissimmee Utility Authority which issued a statement, in response to the film, which clearly chastised the National Geographic docudrama by stating that the threats were overblown. Franks made it clear in his letter, that if anything, the threats of the docudrama were grossly understated! Further, Franks went on to say that the time frame which encompassed the blackout, two weeks, was an additional understatement and âthat a sustained blackout would be catastrophic.â Franks also accuses NERC and its member utilities of historically under-representing the seriousness of the threat of an EMP attack and a subsequent power grid take down.
He went on to say that NERC, was being â dismissiveâ of his claims and that âthe blackout possibilities represents a catastrophic threat to the United States of widespread power loss for potentially months or years that could result in American society tearing itself apart and a horrific loss of human life.â
Hereâs where Frankâs frustration becomes notable. Despite all of the protests from Franks, his reasonable claims fell on deaf ears. Obama at the time snubbed Frankâs efforts at every turn. Obama went so far as to allow the Russians and Chinese observe the Grid EX drills which practiced a grid down scenario. In other words, we showed them how to bring down our grids. We always knew that Obama was a traitor. However, this takes the proverbial cake.
Conclusion
For the price of one B-1 bomber, Obama, on behalf of the Deep State, refused to act to protect America from such an attack. Since the two most likely states who will carry out this attack, Iran and North Korea, we should consider an attack by these states upon the United States to be an attack from their dominant allies, Russia and China. In the present set of events, we are talking about China, North Korea (puppet) and the United States.
The elite will survive. Will You?
A War with China? br Researched by Pastor Gary Boy... (
show quote)
Only the fittest will survive and for what? Life would be rather grim so let's hope it doesn't come to this. Rather, I should say "Let us pray for God to intervene".
ziggy88 wrote:
A War with China?
Researched by Pastor Gary Boyd
China has pretended to support our position on N. Korea. now they have done a dramatic flip flop. It is 1950 all over again. We could very easily be fighting the Chinese as well as the N. Koreans.
The world was shocked when it learned that North Korea launched an ICBM. North Korea has fired its highest-ever intercontinental ballistic missile and poses a worldwide threat, US Secretary of Defense James Mattis has said.
The missile, launched early on Wednesday, landed in Japanese waters. It reached an altitude of 4,500km (2,800 miles) and flew 960km, according to South Koreaâs military.
It was the latest in a series of weapons tests that has raised tensions. Pyongyang last launched a ballistic missile in September.
It also conducted its sixth nuclear test that month. North Korea has continued to develop its nuclear and missile program despite global condemnation and sanctions.
The UN Security Council is due to convene an emergency session to discuss the latest test.
Technologically, this was a significant step forward for the North Koreans. However, is the North Koreans tempting fate, or is this thinly veiled Chinese aggression tied to various free trade agreements.
The Significance of the High Altitutde ICBM
I have learned that an EMP attack would come from a high altitude nuclear burst above the United States. Conversely, a nuclear attack from an ICBM missile would have some elevation in its delivery arc (eg perhaps as high as 150 miles), but the trajectory of an incoming ICBM designed to produce and EMP effect would have to achieve a higher orbit. American defense officials are aware of this. However, do not expect to hear a word about this in the media.
The launch of a North Korean ICBM that achieved a height of 2800 miles speaks to the fact that they are intent in producing high altitude burst resulting in the destruction of most of the grid and electronics within the United States.
North Korea Is Chinaâs Puppet
When China says âjumpâ, the North Koreans respond with âHow high.â The North Korea leaders do not sneeze without the Chinese providing the tissue. If China did not want NK firing ICBMâs, they never would.
NK has now developed the ability to deliver nukes anywhere inside the United States. More importantly, they can deliver an EMP attack through the setting off of a high altitude blast.
Why would China be invested in the North Koreans ramping up their intimidation? The answer is simple and it has to do with free trade. Trump has gotten the best of the Chinese in the latest round of talks regarding trade. China was more in the next round and I think it is likely that the Chinese are playing the NK nuclear/EMP card in order to gain some concessions from Trump when it comes to trade agreements.
To those that think an EMP is no big deal, please look the following paragraphs.
The Areas You Donât Want to Be When an EMP Is Discharged
As James Wesley Rawles pointed out to me in a recent interview, there are several areas that would be very unfortunate for you to be at when an EMP is discharged.
Places not to be:
Being in one of the 4,000 planes that would be flying, would be fatal.
Being in the hospital on life-sustaining equipment.
Being trapped in a high rise building elevator. This would become your tomb.
Being on the highway at night when all the lights and go out as well as most car engines. There would be multiple and devastating accidents.
Being more that 10 miles from home in harsh weather. Do you have a bug-in bag? Consider a fold up bike.
The list is more extensive, but you get the idea.
The Deep State Alliance with North Korea
A few years ago, Congressman Franks (AZ) wrote a very pointed and blunt letter to Frederick Gorbet, the chairman of the Board of Trustees for the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC). Franks jointly addressed his letter to Gary Cauley, the President and CEO of the same organization.
In the letter, Congressman Franks sounds like a man who has had enough as he is as mad as hell and is not going to take it anymore. Franks obviously sees the dire threat posed by an EMP grid take down and is increasingly frustrated with the âPollyannaâsâ who are acting irresponsibly in the face of the threat, especially when some of these people are in positions of responsibility when it comes to protecting the public from a prolonged and catastrophic blackout.
In the letter, Franks points out that National Geographic aired a docudrama entitled American Blackout. The film showed what our countrymen and nation would experience in the event of a cyber attack on the US bulk power distribution system and a resulting shut down of the grid for 10 days. If anything, the serious hardships, dislocation, physical destruction, deaths and societal breakdown portrayed in this docudrama are likely understated.â In my last article, a Franksâ video was played in which he said an EMP take down of the grid would result in 60% of Americans dying as a result of the event. The Naval War College puts the death rate at 90%.
Franks goes on to chastise NERC for the statements of one of its member electric utilities, the Kissimmee Utility Authority which issued a statement, in response to the film, which clearly chastised the National Geographic docudrama by stating that the threats were overblown. Franks made it clear in his letter, that if anything, the threats of the docudrama were grossly understated! Further, Franks went on to say that the time frame which encompassed the blackout, two weeks, was an additional understatement and âthat a sustained blackout would be catastrophic.â Franks also accuses NERC and its member utilities of historically under-representing the seriousness of the threat of an EMP attack and a subsequent power grid take down.
He went on to say that NERC, was being â dismissiveâ of his claims and that âthe blackout possibilities represents a catastrophic threat to the United States of widespread power loss for potentially months or years that could result in American society tearing itself apart and a horrific loss of human life.â
Hereâs where Frankâs frustration becomes notable. Despite all of the protests from Franks, his reasonable claims fell on deaf ears. Obama at the time snubbed Frankâs efforts at every turn. Obama went so far as to allow the Russians and Chinese observe the Grid EX drills which practiced a grid down scenario. In other words, we showed them how to bring down our grids. We always knew that Obama was a traitor. However, this takes the proverbial cake.
Conclusion
For the price of one B-1 bomber, Obama, on behalf of the Deep State, refused to act to protect America from such an attack. Since the two most likely states who will carry out this attack, Iran and North Korea, we should consider an attack by these states upon the United States to be an attack from their dominant allies, Russia and China. In the present set of events, we are talking about China, North Korea (puppet) and the United States.
The elite will survive. Will You?
A War with China? br Researched by Pastor Gary Boy... (
show quote)
Yes, China helped strengthen N.Korea.. but it was another
DEMOCRAT who strengthened China....Clinton.
http://www.nytimes.com/1999/05/11/world/clinton-approves-technology-transfer-to-china.htmlFACT: IF IT WERE NOT FOR DEMOCRATS, WE'D ALL BE SAFER AND MORE PROSPEROUS NOW!
Question: would not an EMT also affect the Koreans and the Chinese especially if set off from high altitude? So why would this be a smart way to attack anyone?🤪
Bshaw wrote:
Question: would not an EMT also affect the Koreans and the Chinese especially if set off from high altitude? So why would this be a smart way to attack anyone?🤪
Not so. The bombing assessment chart included with some reports show that the overall effect will be contained within the targeted continent/country.
The effect upon communication sats., however... ?????
I wonder how much of Canada would be affected also.
SO TELL ME WHY WE WAIT FOR THEM TO ATTACK US. THEY MADE THE THREAT, DO UNTO THEM AS THEY WOULD DO UNTO US. FIRST.
fidelis wrote:
SO TELL ME WHY WE WAIT FOR THEM TO ATTACK US. THEY MADE THE THREAT, DO UNTO THEM AS THEY WOULD DO UNTO US. FIRST.
It may well come to that.
I wonder what the Obama left-over deep state actors will do if we need to get tough and strike?
fidelis wrote:
SO TELL ME WHY WE WAIT FOR THEM TO ATTACK US. THEY MADE THE THREAT, DO UNTO THEM AS THEY WOULD DO UNTO US. FIRST.
Ha! "Let's do it to them before they do it to us". Hill Street Blues.
Here, fast-forward this to about 2:50.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Onc3-qaqnbcAh, the memories.....
ziggy88 wrote:
A War with China?
Researched by Pastor Gary Boyd
China has pretended to support our position on N. Korea. now they have done a dramatic flip flop. It is 1950 all over again. We could very easily be fighting the Chinese as well as the N. Koreans.
The world was shocked when it learned that North Korea launched an ICBM. North Korea has fired its highest-ever intercontinental ballistic missile and poses a worldwide threat, US Secretary of Defense James Mattis has said.
The missile, launched early on Wednesday, landed in Japanese waters. It reached an altitude of 4,500km (2,800 miles) and flew 960km, according to South Koreaâs military.
It was the latest in a series of weapons tests that has raised tensions. Pyongyang last launched a ballistic missile in September.
It also conducted its sixth nuclear test that month. North Korea has continued to develop its nuclear and missile program despite global condemnation and sanctions.
The UN Security Council is due to convene an emergency session to discuss the latest test.
Technologically, this was a significant step forward for the North Koreans. However, is the North Koreans tempting fate, or is this thinly veiled Chinese aggression tied to various free trade agreements.
The Significance of the High Altitutde ICBM
I have learned that an EMP attack would come from a high altitude nuclear burst above the United States. Conversely, a nuclear attack from an ICBM missile would have some elevation in its delivery arc (eg perhaps as high as 150 miles), but the trajectory of an incoming ICBM designed to produce and EMP effect would have to achieve a higher orbit. American defense officials are aware of this. However, do not expect to hear a word about this in the media.
The launch of a North Korean ICBM that achieved a height of 2800 miles speaks to the fact that they are intent in producing high altitude burst resulting in the destruction of most of the grid and electronics within the United States.
North Korea Is Chinaâs Puppet
When China says âjumpâ, the North Koreans respond with âHow high.â The North Korea leaders do not sneeze without the Chinese providing the tissue. If China did not want NK firing ICBMâs, they never would.
NK has now developed the ability to deliver nukes anywhere inside the United States. More importantly, they can deliver an EMP attack through the setting off of a high altitude blast.
Why would China be invested in the North Koreans ramping up their intimidation? The answer is simple and it has to do with free trade. Trump has gotten the best of the Chinese in the latest round of talks regarding trade. China was more in the next round and I think it is likely that the Chinese are playing the NK nuclear/EMP card in order to gain some concessions from Trump when it comes to trade agreements.
To those that think an EMP is no big deal, please look the following paragraphs.
The Areas You Donât Want to Be When an EMP Is Discharged
As James Wesley Rawles pointed out to me in a recent interview, there are several areas that would be very unfortunate for you to be at when an EMP is discharged.
Places not to be:
Being in one of the 4,000 planes that would be flying, would be fatal.
Being in the hospital on life-sustaining equipment.
Being trapped in a high rise building elevator. This would become your tomb.
Being on the highway at night when all the lights and go out as well as most car engines. There would be multiple and devastating accidents.
Being more that 10 miles from home in harsh weather. Do you have a bug-in bag? Consider a fold up bike.
The list is more extensive, but you get the idea.
The Deep State Alliance with North Korea
A few years ago, Congressman Franks (AZ) wrote a very pointed and blunt letter to Frederick Gorbet, the chairman of the Board of Trustees for the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC). Franks jointly addressed his letter to Gary Cauley, the President and CEO of the same organization.
In the letter, Congressman Franks sounds like a man who has had enough as he is as mad as hell and is not going to take it anymore. Franks obviously sees the dire threat posed by an EMP grid take down and is increasingly frustrated with the âPollyannaâsâ who are acting irresponsibly in the face of the threat, especially when some of these people are in positions of responsibility when it comes to protecting the public from a prolonged and catastrophic blackout.
In the letter, Franks points out that National Geographic aired a docudrama entitled American Blackout. The film showed what our countrymen and nation would experience in the event of a cyber attack on the US bulk power distribution system and a resulting shut down of the grid for 10 days. If anything, the serious hardships, dislocation, physical destruction, deaths and societal breakdown portrayed in this docudrama are likely understated.â In my last article, a Franksâ video was played in which he said an EMP take down of the grid would result in 60% of Americans dying as a result of the event. The Naval War College puts the death rate at 90%.
Franks goes on to chastise NERC for the statements of one of its member electric utilities, the Kissimmee Utility Authority which issued a statement, in response to the film, which clearly chastised the National Geographic docudrama by stating that the threats were overblown. Franks made it clear in his letter, that if anything, the threats of the docudrama were grossly understated! Further, Franks went on to say that the time frame which encompassed the blackout, two weeks, was an additional understatement and âthat a sustained blackout would be catastrophic.â Franks also accuses NERC and its member utilities of historically under-representing the seriousness of the threat of an EMP attack and a subsequent power grid take down.
He went on to say that NERC, was being â dismissiveâ of his claims and that âthe blackout possibilities represents a catastrophic threat to the United States of widespread power loss for potentially months or years that could result in American society tearing itself apart and a horrific loss of human life.â
Hereâs where Frankâs frustration becomes notable. Despite all of the protests from Franks, his reasonable claims fell on deaf ears. Obama at the time snubbed Frankâs efforts at every turn. Obama went so far as to allow the Russians and Chinese observe the Grid EX drills which practiced a grid down scenario. In other words, we showed them how to bring down our grids. We always knew that Obama was a traitor. However, this takes the proverbial cake.
Conclusion
For the price of one B-1 bomber, Obama, on behalf of the Deep State, refused to act to protect America from such an attack. Since the two most likely states who will carry out this attack, Iran and North Korea, we should consider an attack by these states upon the United States to be an attack from their dominant allies, Russia and China. In the present set of events, we are talking about China, North Korea (puppet) and the United States.
The elite will survive. Will You?
A War with China? br Researched by Pastor Gary Boy... (
show quote)
========================
With this proof, Obama is he greatest traitor to our country. HE wants Russia, China, Iran, or North Korea, destroy the US after his term expires. He and his family could escape for safety to the Arab countries and laugh at the US. That is the problem with electing a non-citizen or someone who is not a natural born US citizen. All those who voted for Obama as traitors as well. He bankrupted the US during his reign.
Here is the proof that Obama is a traitor:
"Hereâs where Frankâs frustration becomes notable. Despite all of the protests from Franks, his reasonable claims fell on deaf ears. Obama at the time snubbed Frankâs efforts at every turn. Obama went so far as to allow the Russians and Chinese observe the Grid EX drills which practiced a grid down scenario. In other words, we showed them how to bring down our grids. We always knew that Obama was a traitor. However, this takes the proverbial cake."
Bshaw wrote:
Question: would not an EMT also affect the Koreans and the Chinese especially if set off from high altitude? So why would this be a smart way to attack anyone?🤪
======================
Never trust the Chinese. They want to present to the world that they are part of diplomacy and frienship with the US. But deep in their strategy was to completely dominate the world, both militarily and economically. With the help of NK, China's weapon against the West, China could control the whole Pacific. It started building up military stations at the Spartley islands they don't own. China encnroaced on those islands owned by Japan, the Philippines, Vietnam. and South Korea. Strategically, China now has a the greatest advantage over the Pacific. I believe if NK takes over South Kora, China will help the North to enlarge their territories.
China is a traitor and manipulator. In addition, Obama, the traitor, had allowed China master the EMT proliferation against the US. China now is our greatest enemy, and not the Russians. While Obama is the traitor within.
Radiance3 wrote:
======================
Never trust the Chinese. They want to present to the world that they are part of diplomacy and frienship with the US. But deep in their strategy was to completely dominate the world, both militarily and economically. With the help of NK, China's weapon against the West, China could control the whole Pacific. It started building up military stations at the Spartley islands they don't own. China encnroaced on those islands owned by Japan, the Philippines, Vietnam. and South Korea. Strategically, China now has a the greatest advantage over the Pacific. I believe if NK takes over South Kora, China will help the North to enlarge their territories.
China is a traitor and manipulator. In addition, Obama, the traitor, had allowed China master the EMT proliferation against the US. China now is our greatest enemy, and not the Russians. While Obama is the traitor within.
====================== br Never trust the Chinese.... (
show quote)
The Muslim FRAUD and the Democrat party are the EVIL here.They have been aiding CHINA since Slick Willy sold out America
Babsan wrote:
The Muslim FRAUD and the Democrat party are the EVIL here.They have been aiding CHINA since Slick Willy sold out America
I could not agree more. Both groups- ISIS-types and our democrat/socialists have the same goal- the destruction of the USA. Period.
I also agree with Radience3's statement:
"China is a traitor and manipulator. In addition, Obama, the traitor, had allowed China master the EMT proliferation against the US. China now is our greatest enemy, and not the Russians. While Obama is the traitor within."One other thing about mentioning Obama-the-traitor in the present tense-- he is still working to effect our demise. That situation needs addressing.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
