Not Even Fox News Won't Report On This...
Nov 17, 2017 12:55:24 #
Don G. Dinsdale
Loc: El Cajon, CA (San Diego County)
If You Are a Democrat (New School), or Liberal or Progressive or Leftist Please Don't Read This, It'll Force You To Think And Many (Not You I'm Pretty Sure) Are Not Able To Do So With Worrying About a Stroke... Don D. 
The Obama Uranium-1 Story Even FOX News Won’t Speak About!
The $145,000,000 That Wound Up At The Clinton Family Foundation For No Reason At All.
By Andrew G. Benjamin ~ Nov 17, 2017 ~ Canada Free Press
Midday on November 14th, FOX News talking head Shepard Smith, whom we might charitably label as a liberal non-heterosexual who may not like Donald Trump, meaning his politics have everything to do with his sexual preferences and whom he would vote for, and very little to do with reality, gave the nation a much-needed reality check.
Hillary Clinton is innocent of all charges. As Shepard opened his mouth, we saw former FBI Director James Comey’s eyes peeking out.
Shepard’s was a monologue over which the liberal press went bananas. Or “ape” if you will.
You see, the Clinton-Uranium-1 Story is, according to Shepard and the Kool Aid his media mates at CNN and MSNBC drink, a fairytale. Or given the much overused cliché, “a nothing burger”, a fabrication of The Vast Right Wing Conspiracy.
The line is the line according to Smith and his media mates on every other channel that would give the death penalty to Team Trump and his family at the earliest opportunity, for the mere outrage of winning an election, with the stories of every Democrat calling for impeachment.
“The accusation is predicated on the charge that Secretary Clinton approved the sale. She did not. A committee of nine evaluated the sale, the president approved the sale, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and others had to offer permits, and none of the uranium was exported for use by the U.S. to Russia.” said Smith.
SHEPARD SMITH YOU TUBE
Smith’s monologue was meant to dispel any suspicion still hanging in with FOX viewers about the Clintons who have, throughout their illustrious careers, only benefited the nation. It was meant to reinforce in liberal minds the fact that Donald Trump colluded with Vladimir Putin who made them pull 63 million levers across America for Donald Trump. It is meant to fix in one’s mind the notion that the entire Trump Team is guilty of perjury and even treason. And the idea that Barack Obama colluded with Hillary and the Russians about anything is preposterous, since their suspected collusion is not reported on any channel except for Shepard’s, and therefore does not exist.
The gist of Shepard’s historical “innovation” is that Hillary Clinton is wholly innocent of accusations about how and why the $145 million wound up in her family’s slush fund AFTER the sale took place. It is to dispel the notion of a possible RICO (organized crime) investigation into the Clinton Matter. Shepard’s spin suggests that the Clintons are hardly greedy, in fact, never; or self-dealing and treacherous. Donald Trump is, for questioning the Clinton Matter in tweets.
The bottom-line of Shepard’s astonishing Aesop’s Fables and the non-contextualization of history (as well as the record of the players), was that there were nine cabinet members of CIFUS, The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, who had unanimously, of their free will, approved the “good deal” that was ultimately approved by the president himself. The same president who appointed the self-same cabinet.
Clearly, as in law, precedent must rule in this matter, the same as the precedent for the Iran Nuke Deal which was a Good Deal for America (that was the line our past president from some central African nation told us); as the North Korean Nuke Deal was a Good Deal for America (which was the line the husband of the last female Democrat presidential candidate told the nation over two decades ago); as is the Uranium-1 good deal from which ONLY the Clinton Family Foundation profited. It had to be a Good Deal for America, and the $145 million slush fund the Clintons can do with as they will happens to be a sidebar.
Every Deal From Which America’s Enemies Profit Has to Be a Good Deal For America.
Or charity - if you will.
Especially with all the Good Deals in which Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama got involved.
For example:
The Benghazi-Gate Good Deal in which the United States got run out of North Africa by a band of extremist religious thugs, got Americans killed just to make the deal better, and made certain that that nation was taken over by ISIS.
The Russian Reset Button Good Deal which set the stage for Putin’s takeover of Crimea and then Syria.
The Iran Nukes Good Deal which insured that Iran will not only continue to develop IBCM’s - Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles - but in less than eight years arm them with MIRVs - Multiple Re-entry Vehicles tipped with nuclear bombs. that Good Deal was meant to make Americans happy.
The Eric Holder Fast & Furious Good Deal in which 55,000 Mexicans and some Americans were murdered by weapons seized by Barack Obama and Holder from American citizens, and given to the Mexican drug cartels. Hillary was SecState at the time dealing “diplomatically” with Mexico for America’s benefit.
The IRS-gate Good Deal in which American organizations and groups with words in their names such as “American,” “Patriot,” “Constitution,” and similar suggesting a faith in law and allegiance to the nation, were targeted for examination - and then deliberately paralyzed from raising funds for political campaigns.
The DNC-Clinton Primary Fix-Gate Good Deal in which a year prior to the presidential primaries one candidate received, by written agreement from the Party itself, full control of the party, its activities and decision-making, and all the money the party raised. Funds which she promptly redirected to her own campaign and into her own pockets. Clearly, she was never greedy and self-dealing and never had any interest in uranium.
Under the greatest president ever, Barack Obama, and his former SecState Hillary, Good Deals for America were almost a daily occurrence and even Settled Science.
In 2009 and 2010, in a bid to corner and dominate the global uranium market, Russia’s atomic energy agency, Rosatom, was anxious to take over a majority stake in the uranium mining company UrAsia formerly owned by Clinton ally and benefactor, Canadian Frank Giustra.
After the board members of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States appointed by Barack Obama with Hillary Clinton’s nod approved the sale, as well as managing the approval of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissionleadership appointed by Barack Obama at Clinton’s behest, Russia bought the rest of Uranium One in 2013. Clearly, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton had nothing to do with this Good Deal to benefit the American People and put America’s uranium assets in Russian hands.
As the CFIUS includes the State Department as one of the regulatory body’s members, Hillary asserted that she had nothing to do with “massaging” the deal because she never had any interest in money, uranium, or even her own agency at State. She kept insisting that a number of agencies had agreed to the good deal for America because they too, had no interest in making the Clintons fabulously wealthy. According to the latest reports from insider sources on the inside speaking anonymously behind closed doors at an undetermined date and place, she did not go so far as to suggest that selling off America’s assets and wealth was also a good deal, but we might presume that she was thinking it.
What Shepard Smith failed to disclose is that the “friendly” - as opposed to hostile - Uranium One takeover began in 2005. Meanwhile behind the scenes we presume Hillary Clinton was the senator at the time pushing the deal. And Frank Giustra still owned the company.
The Clintons were at his side for no reason at all all this time. For example, no reason like this, reported by the Times:
“The $500,000 (speaking) fee (in Moscow)—among Mr. Clinton’s highest—was paid by Renaissance Capital, a Russian investment bank with ties to the Kremlin…”
The two men had flown aboard Mr. Giustra’s private jet to Almaty, Kazakhstan, where they dined with the authoritarian president, Nursultan A. Nazarbayev. Mr. Clinton handed the Kazakh president a propaganda coup when he expressed support for Mr. Nazarbayev’s bid to head an international elections monitoring group, undercutting American foreign policy and criticism of Kazakhstan’s poor human rights record by, among others, his wife, (Hillary Clinton) then a senator.
Within days of the visit, Mr. Giustra’s fledgling company, UrAsia Energy Ltd., signed a preliminary deal giving it stakes in three uranium mines controlled by the state-run uranium agency Kazatomprom.
If the Kazakh deal was a major victory, UrAsia did not wait long before resuming the hunt. In 2007, it merged with Uranium One, a South African company with assets in Africa and Australia, in what was described as a $3.5 billion transaction. The new company, which kept the Uranium One name, was controlled by UrAsia investors including Ian Telfer, a Canadian who became chairman. Through a spokeswoman, Mr. Giustra, whose personal stake in the deal was estimated at about $45 million, said he sold his stake in 2007.
Soon, Uranium One began to snap up companies with assets in the United States. In April 2007, it announced the purchase of a uranium mill in Utah and more than 38,000 acres of uranium exploration properties in four Western states, followed quickly by the acquisition of the Energy Metals Corporation and its uranium holdings in Wyoming, Texas and Utah. That deal made clear that Uranium One was intent on becoming ‚ a powerhouse in the United States uranium sector with the potential to become the domestic supplier of choice for U.S. utilities,” the company declared. The Times published an article revealing the 2005 trip’s link to Mr. Giustra’s Kazakhstan mining deal. It also reported that several months later, Mr. Giustra had donated $31.3 million to Mr. Clinton’s foundation.
Meanwhile, as Team Clinton reportedly spent $1.2 Billion on getting her elected to the presidency mostly so no investigation will ever be launched into the Clinton Good Deals (that $1.2B represents One Thousand Two Hundred times a Million dollars) CNN gave you updates 24/7 for months about the Russians using FACEBOOK to infringe on American democracy and turn an American election in Donald Trump’s favor.
With the $6500 that FACEBOOK reported the Russians spent.
An amount that would not buy a used steel, never mind, gold, Rolex.
What Shepard Smith neglected to disclose among all the good deals going down among his media mates at CNN and MSNBC,The NY Times and WashPo, is the timing and the timeline, and that 1 + 1 may actually equal 2. Possibly 3.
The Times:
“Mr. Telfer’s (the chairman of UrAsia) undisclosed donations came in addition to between $1.3 million and $5.6 million in contributions, which were reported, from a constellation of people with ties to Uranium One or UrAsia, the company that originally acquired Uranium One’s most valuable asset: the Kazakh mines. Without those assets, the Russians would have had no interest in the deal…..”
At least no interest in the deal until a former president who made previous Good Deals that armed North Korea with nukes and ICBMs, came to the rescue with a $500,000 speech that lasted at most 10 minutes, with “guarantees” for millions more to arrive shortly for which no speeches will will be made. And a box of cigars.
Bill Clinton, with Hillary at his side in the early years, made sure that the Kahakh mines would become Russian mines. And the American mines become Russian mines. She was SecState at the time, and if you’re seeing a conflict of interest and self-dealing, you are seeing things.
It appears Shepard deliberately neglected the obvious for political reasons of his own, in a speech that LeftMedia is now celebrating thinking that FOX News, just like they, are now in the tank with the Clinton narrative. Look, $145 million goes a long way to persuade the reluctant that the sky is not blue.
For after all, there are no more deserving people to benefit from all the Good Deals than the ones who made them: Barack Obama and the Clintons.
Theirs is the Good Deal that stipulated that:
1. The $145,000,000 that wound up at the Clinton Family Foundation for no reason at all got there for no reason at all.
AND
2. That, for no reason at all Barack Obama appointed ALL the voters at CIFUS and the other agencies under his command who approved the Good Deal without ANY dissent. And then Barry approved the sale himself according to Smith.
For absolutely no reason at all.
Not even the $145,000,000 reason and a genuine replica of the Reset Button.
(c) Andrew G, Benjamin
REPORT TO CONGRESS - CIFUS
http://canadafreepress.com/article/the-obama-uranium-1-story-even-fox-news-wont-speak-about
The Obama Uranium-1 Story Even FOX News Won’t Speak About!
The $145,000,000 That Wound Up At The Clinton Family Foundation For No Reason At All.
By Andrew G. Benjamin ~ Nov 17, 2017 ~ Canada Free Press
Midday on November 14th, FOX News talking head Shepard Smith, whom we might charitably label as a liberal non-heterosexual who may not like Donald Trump, meaning his politics have everything to do with his sexual preferences and whom he would vote for, and very little to do with reality, gave the nation a much-needed reality check.
Hillary Clinton is innocent of all charges. As Shepard opened his mouth, we saw former FBI Director James Comey’s eyes peeking out.
Shepard’s was a monologue over which the liberal press went bananas. Or “ape” if you will.
You see, the Clinton-Uranium-1 Story is, according to Shepard and the Kool Aid his media mates at CNN and MSNBC drink, a fairytale. Or given the much overused cliché, “a nothing burger”, a fabrication of The Vast Right Wing Conspiracy.
The line is the line according to Smith and his media mates on every other channel that would give the death penalty to Team Trump and his family at the earliest opportunity, for the mere outrage of winning an election, with the stories of every Democrat calling for impeachment.
“The accusation is predicated on the charge that Secretary Clinton approved the sale. She did not. A committee of nine evaluated the sale, the president approved the sale, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and others had to offer permits, and none of the uranium was exported for use by the U.S. to Russia.” said Smith.
SHEPARD SMITH YOU TUBE
Smith’s monologue was meant to dispel any suspicion still hanging in with FOX viewers about the Clintons who have, throughout their illustrious careers, only benefited the nation. It was meant to reinforce in liberal minds the fact that Donald Trump colluded with Vladimir Putin who made them pull 63 million levers across America for Donald Trump. It is meant to fix in one’s mind the notion that the entire Trump Team is guilty of perjury and even treason. And the idea that Barack Obama colluded with Hillary and the Russians about anything is preposterous, since their suspected collusion is not reported on any channel except for Shepard’s, and therefore does not exist.
The gist of Shepard’s historical “innovation” is that Hillary Clinton is wholly innocent of accusations about how and why the $145 million wound up in her family’s slush fund AFTER the sale took place. It is to dispel the notion of a possible RICO (organized crime) investigation into the Clinton Matter. Shepard’s spin suggests that the Clintons are hardly greedy, in fact, never; or self-dealing and treacherous. Donald Trump is, for questioning the Clinton Matter in tweets.
The bottom-line of Shepard’s astonishing Aesop’s Fables and the non-contextualization of history (as well as the record of the players), was that there were nine cabinet members of CIFUS, The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, who had unanimously, of their free will, approved the “good deal” that was ultimately approved by the president himself. The same president who appointed the self-same cabinet.
Clearly, as in law, precedent must rule in this matter, the same as the precedent for the Iran Nuke Deal which was a Good Deal for America (that was the line our past president from some central African nation told us); as the North Korean Nuke Deal was a Good Deal for America (which was the line the husband of the last female Democrat presidential candidate told the nation over two decades ago); as is the Uranium-1 good deal from which ONLY the Clinton Family Foundation profited. It had to be a Good Deal for America, and the $145 million slush fund the Clintons can do with as they will happens to be a sidebar.
Every Deal From Which America’s Enemies Profit Has to Be a Good Deal For America.
Or charity - if you will.
Especially with all the Good Deals in which Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama got involved.
For example:
The Benghazi-Gate Good Deal in which the United States got run out of North Africa by a band of extremist religious thugs, got Americans killed just to make the deal better, and made certain that that nation was taken over by ISIS.
The Russian Reset Button Good Deal which set the stage for Putin’s takeover of Crimea and then Syria.
The Iran Nukes Good Deal which insured that Iran will not only continue to develop IBCM’s - Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles - but in less than eight years arm them with MIRVs - Multiple Re-entry Vehicles tipped with nuclear bombs. that Good Deal was meant to make Americans happy.
The Eric Holder Fast & Furious Good Deal in which 55,000 Mexicans and some Americans were murdered by weapons seized by Barack Obama and Holder from American citizens, and given to the Mexican drug cartels. Hillary was SecState at the time dealing “diplomatically” with Mexico for America’s benefit.
The IRS-gate Good Deal in which American organizations and groups with words in their names such as “American,” “Patriot,” “Constitution,” and similar suggesting a faith in law and allegiance to the nation, were targeted for examination - and then deliberately paralyzed from raising funds for political campaigns.
The DNC-Clinton Primary Fix-Gate Good Deal in which a year prior to the presidential primaries one candidate received, by written agreement from the Party itself, full control of the party, its activities and decision-making, and all the money the party raised. Funds which she promptly redirected to her own campaign and into her own pockets. Clearly, she was never greedy and self-dealing and never had any interest in uranium.
Under the greatest president ever, Barack Obama, and his former SecState Hillary, Good Deals for America were almost a daily occurrence and even Settled Science.
In 2009 and 2010, in a bid to corner and dominate the global uranium market, Russia’s atomic energy agency, Rosatom, was anxious to take over a majority stake in the uranium mining company UrAsia formerly owned by Clinton ally and benefactor, Canadian Frank Giustra.
After the board members of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States appointed by Barack Obama with Hillary Clinton’s nod approved the sale, as well as managing the approval of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissionleadership appointed by Barack Obama at Clinton’s behest, Russia bought the rest of Uranium One in 2013. Clearly, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton had nothing to do with this Good Deal to benefit the American People and put America’s uranium assets in Russian hands.
As the CFIUS includes the State Department as one of the regulatory body’s members, Hillary asserted that she had nothing to do with “massaging” the deal because she never had any interest in money, uranium, or even her own agency at State. She kept insisting that a number of agencies had agreed to the good deal for America because they too, had no interest in making the Clintons fabulously wealthy. According to the latest reports from insider sources on the inside speaking anonymously behind closed doors at an undetermined date and place, she did not go so far as to suggest that selling off America’s assets and wealth was also a good deal, but we might presume that she was thinking it.
What Shepard Smith failed to disclose is that the “friendly” - as opposed to hostile - Uranium One takeover began in 2005. Meanwhile behind the scenes we presume Hillary Clinton was the senator at the time pushing the deal. And Frank Giustra still owned the company.
The Clintons were at his side for no reason at all all this time. For example, no reason like this, reported by the Times:
“The $500,000 (speaking) fee (in Moscow)—among Mr. Clinton’s highest—was paid by Renaissance Capital, a Russian investment bank with ties to the Kremlin…”
The two men had flown aboard Mr. Giustra’s private jet to Almaty, Kazakhstan, where they dined with the authoritarian president, Nursultan A. Nazarbayev. Mr. Clinton handed the Kazakh president a propaganda coup when he expressed support for Mr. Nazarbayev’s bid to head an international elections monitoring group, undercutting American foreign policy and criticism of Kazakhstan’s poor human rights record by, among others, his wife, (Hillary Clinton) then a senator.
Within days of the visit, Mr. Giustra’s fledgling company, UrAsia Energy Ltd., signed a preliminary deal giving it stakes in three uranium mines controlled by the state-run uranium agency Kazatomprom.
If the Kazakh deal was a major victory, UrAsia did not wait long before resuming the hunt. In 2007, it merged with Uranium One, a South African company with assets in Africa and Australia, in what was described as a $3.5 billion transaction. The new company, which kept the Uranium One name, was controlled by UrAsia investors including Ian Telfer, a Canadian who became chairman. Through a spokeswoman, Mr. Giustra, whose personal stake in the deal was estimated at about $45 million, said he sold his stake in 2007.
Soon, Uranium One began to snap up companies with assets in the United States. In April 2007, it announced the purchase of a uranium mill in Utah and more than 38,000 acres of uranium exploration properties in four Western states, followed quickly by the acquisition of the Energy Metals Corporation and its uranium holdings in Wyoming, Texas and Utah. That deal made clear that Uranium One was intent on becoming ‚ a powerhouse in the United States uranium sector with the potential to become the domestic supplier of choice for U.S. utilities,” the company declared. The Times published an article revealing the 2005 trip’s link to Mr. Giustra’s Kazakhstan mining deal. It also reported that several months later, Mr. Giustra had donated $31.3 million to Mr. Clinton’s foundation.
Meanwhile, as Team Clinton reportedly spent $1.2 Billion on getting her elected to the presidency mostly so no investigation will ever be launched into the Clinton Good Deals (that $1.2B represents One Thousand Two Hundred times a Million dollars) CNN gave you updates 24/7 for months about the Russians using FACEBOOK to infringe on American democracy and turn an American election in Donald Trump’s favor.
With the $6500 that FACEBOOK reported the Russians spent.
An amount that would not buy a used steel, never mind, gold, Rolex.
What Shepard Smith neglected to disclose among all the good deals going down among his media mates at CNN and MSNBC,The NY Times and WashPo, is the timing and the timeline, and that 1 + 1 may actually equal 2. Possibly 3.
The Times:
“Mr. Telfer’s (the chairman of UrAsia) undisclosed donations came in addition to between $1.3 million and $5.6 million in contributions, which were reported, from a constellation of people with ties to Uranium One or UrAsia, the company that originally acquired Uranium One’s most valuable asset: the Kazakh mines. Without those assets, the Russians would have had no interest in the deal…..”
At least no interest in the deal until a former president who made previous Good Deals that armed North Korea with nukes and ICBMs, came to the rescue with a $500,000 speech that lasted at most 10 minutes, with “guarantees” for millions more to arrive shortly for which no speeches will will be made. And a box of cigars.
Bill Clinton, with Hillary at his side in the early years, made sure that the Kahakh mines would become Russian mines. And the American mines become Russian mines. She was SecState at the time, and if you’re seeing a conflict of interest and self-dealing, you are seeing things.
It appears Shepard deliberately neglected the obvious for political reasons of his own, in a speech that LeftMedia is now celebrating thinking that FOX News, just like they, are now in the tank with the Clinton narrative. Look, $145 million goes a long way to persuade the reluctant that the sky is not blue.
For after all, there are no more deserving people to benefit from all the Good Deals than the ones who made them: Barack Obama and the Clintons.
Theirs is the Good Deal that stipulated that:
1. The $145,000,000 that wound up at the Clinton Family Foundation for no reason at all got there for no reason at all.
AND
2. That, for no reason at all Barack Obama appointed ALL the voters at CIFUS and the other agencies under his command who approved the Good Deal without ANY dissent. And then Barry approved the sale himself according to Smith.
For absolutely no reason at all.
Not even the $145,000,000 reason and a genuine replica of the Reset Button.
(c) Andrew G, Benjamin
REPORT TO CONGRESS - CIFUS
http://canadafreepress.com/article/the-obama-uranium-1-story-even-fox-news-wont-speak-about
Nov 17, 2017 13:09:30 #
proud republican
Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
Don G. Dinsdale wrote:
If You Are a Democrat (New School), or Liberal or ... (show quote)
I have never trusted Shepard Smith..He should not work at FOX...As for Uranium One deal, there is still FBI informant who is going to talk to Congress and he has all the documents proving Hillary's briberies regarding
Uranium One.....
Nov 17, 2017 13:37:18 #
If ever there was the need for a special counsel, this is it. Jeff Sessions, this is your chance to be a hero. If you don't take it, why not??
Hellary televised an interview trying to discount "rumors" about the Uranium 1 deal. I thought her comments sounded more like a veiled threat.
Let's hope Hannity sinks his teeth into this one.
Hellary televised an interview trying to discount "rumors" about the Uranium 1 deal. I thought her comments sounded more like a veiled threat.
Let's hope Hannity sinks his teeth into this one.
Nov 17, 2017 13:41:45 #
proud republican
Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
Big Bass wrote:
If ever there was the need for a special counsel, this is it. Jeff Sessions, this is your chance to be a hero. If you don't take it, why not??
Hellary televised an interview trying to discount "rumors" about the Uranium 1 deal. I thought her comments sounded more like a veiled threat.
Let's hope Hannity sinks his teeth into this one.
Hellary televised an interview trying to discount "rumors" about the Uranium 1 deal. I thought her comments sounded more like a veiled threat.
Let's hope Hannity sinks his teeth into this one.
Jeff Sessions is not a hero in my eyes!!! He is a COWARD!!!I hope he proves me wrong!!!
Nov 17, 2017 13:46:18 #
proud republican wrote:
Jeff Sessions is not a hero in my eyes!!! He is a COWARD!!!I hope he proves me wrong!!!
Yes. I've been wondering about him. Now is his chance to redeem himself.
Nov 17, 2017 13:48:55 #
proud republican
Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
Big Bass wrote:
Yes. I've been wondering about him. Now is his chance to redeem himself.
Iwouldnt hold my breath,Bass!!!
Nov 17, 2017 13:52:39 #
Nov 17, 2017 13:53:25 #
Nov 18, 2017 16:32:54 #
proud republican wrote:
Jeff Sessions is not a hero in my eyes!!! He is a COWARD!!!I hope he proves me wrong!!!
This is too big for justice. All of Washington DC knows what happened with Ghazi-Ghate and Serverg@te and now uranigate, but you see, it's much easier to take Trump down than to take down the obama Clinton cabal and most of Washington DC.
So, like always, nothing is going to happen to illiar or obama or any democrat. Remove Trump, it's so much more convenient.
Nov 18, 2017 17:19:16 #
Don G. Dinsdale wrote:
If You Are a Democrat (New School), or Liberal or ... (show quote)
===============
I think Ship Smith is getting delusional.
These massive crimes of Hillary Clinton need to be investigated, and a special prosecutor be assigned. NOT MUELLER.
1. Started from co-mingling her official communication including CLASSIFED to her personal email server.
2. When asked by Congress to submit her emails, several hundred thousands were not submitted.
3. hundreds of thousands shredded.
4. 33,000 bleach bitted to avoid tracking.
5. Hired IT tech to hammer into pieces to laptop hard drives to prevent tracking of data.
6. All these documents are under subpoena by Congress, but destroyed.
7. While Comey investigated, his mail called it GROSS NEGLIGENT.
8. Two months before final investigation, Comey exonerated Hillary.
9. Comey had no right to exonerate Hillary, it must be DOJ Lynch.
10. Few days before Hillary faces final investigation, Bill and Lynch met at the Airport Tarmac for 45 minutes.
11. Lynch described Hillary's crimes as a "MATTER" . From Gross negligence, to extremely careless to matter
to avoid prosecution.
In 2010, a sale of 20% US Uranium One under a CFIUS (Committee on Foreign Investment in the US), signed by 9 Members, one of that was Hillary Clinton. Negotiations were undertaken, Clinton received more than $30,000 at the initial money before that. . After approved, Clinton received $145 million, plus a 15 minute speaking engagement of Bill Clinton for $500,000.
The deal was required to be approved by the 9 members of CFIUS, one of that was Hillary Clinton who signed, and received lucrative sums of money for her elicit Foundation.
While all the above events happened Mueller was the FBI Director, and Rosenstein was the deputy. Mueller ignored all her crimes.
Hillary must be LOCKED UP.
Nov 18, 2017 17:24:06 #
Radiance3 wrote:
=============== br I think Ship Smith is getting d... (show quote)
Hah, like her ankles, fat chance of that happening. Only Trump wants her locked up, everyone else in Washington DC wants Trump locked up.
Nov 19, 2017 05:39:25 #
proud republican wrote:
I have never trusted Shepard Smith..He should not work at FOX...As for Uranium One deal, there is still FBI informant who is going to talk to Congress and he has all the documents proving Hillary's briberies regarding
Uranium One.....
Uranium One.....
If they can get to him, he is a dead man. As the old saying goes, "Dead men tell no tales!" This old saying is about as good as it gets.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.