One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
If selling a wedding cake to a gay couple means...then...
Page <<first <prev 4 of 11 next> last>>
Oct 11, 2017 12:00:19   #
Worried for our children Loc: Massachusetts
 
slatten49 wrote:
You could always change it to "Don't mess with Texas."


Lol!!! I was thinking something more along the line of "Hey WFOC & BB, do you guys accept IOU's". ~ Slatten49

Reply
Oct 11, 2017 12:02:34   #
Worried for our children Loc: Massachusetts
 
Ve'hoe wrote:
Well,,,, for someone who has Assalam Alaykum on his avatar, obviously he embraces islam.....

Islam embraces homosexuality,,,,,, just before throwing them off the building

You make the connections,,,,,,,,,,,,

Ok. But it still appears as though you would be attacking the person, and not the message of the posted topic, no?

Reply
Oct 11, 2017 12:05:56   #
Worried for our children Loc: Massachusetts
 
MatthewlovesAyn wrote:
It's time to turn this around on the leftists (a term I find abhorrent since I'm left handed) and find a gay bakery someplace and have them make a MAGA wedding cake, or perhaps a Muslim bakery and have them make a "Everything tastes better with bacon" cake. Forcing people to do things is wrong. What don't they get. Freedom of association has got to become the law of the land.

The one big flaw in the Civil Rights Act was forcing businesses to serve people they don't want to serve. Let the free market be the final arbiter when it comes to providing for people. If a diner doesn't want to serve black people, I'll open one next door and welcome them with open arms.
It's time to turn this around on the leftists (a t... (show quote)


No worries, Matthew. They say the left side of the brain controls the right side of the body, and vice versa. I think you're good.

Reply
 
 
Oct 11, 2017 12:06:28   #
Ve'hoe
 
No,,,, I didnt make him say anything,,, nor post an anti-gay religious sects words on his avatar..........to offend others,,,, then pretend he is with them...

typical of the liberal mentality,,, middle finger up to everyone,, no answers,,,, and having you fight his fights,,,


Worried for our children wrote:
Ok. But it still appears as though you would be attacking the person, and not the message of the posted topic, no?

Reply
Oct 11, 2017 12:07:19   #
slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
 
Worried for our children wrote:
Lol!!! I was thinking something more along the line of "Hey WFOC & BB, do you guys accept IOU's". ~ Slatten49

Statements predicated on fiction are non-admissible, young man.


Reply
Oct 11, 2017 12:14:32   #
4430 Loc: Little Egypt ** Southern Illinory
 
Kevyn wrote:
A couple of right wing knuckel heads pranced into a Muslim owned bakery in Dearborn Michigan with a hidden camera sure that when they ordered a “gay wedding cake” they would be denied, and given what they realy wanted a propaganda film. Imagine their surprise when the order was taken without any question.


You got any solid proof O Wise one ?

You are aware of how Muslim feel about queers don't you ? Like throwing them off tall buildings .

Reply
Oct 11, 2017 12:17:05   #
Big Bass
 
PeterS wrote:
Good question.


That is what is known as a "non sequitur."

Reply
 
 
Oct 11, 2017 12:24:41   #
Worried for our children Loc: Massachusetts
 
Ve'hoe wrote:
No,,,, I didnt make him say anything,,, nor post an anti-gay religious sects words on his avatar..........to offend others,,,, then pretend he is with them...

typical of the liberal mentality,,, middle finger up to everyone,, no answers,,,, and having you fight his fights,,,


Ok. But what do his signature statements have to do with the topic? The topic is the "message" that I'm referring to. If the topic was muslims/islam, then I could make the connection.

I'm not fighting his fights, he can handle himself just fine. I'm just trying to point out the distinction between attacking the message, and not the person, in an effort to bring OPP toward civility.

Btw, I was looking for another post of yours about my turdnest quote, don't remember what you said exactly, but you thought I should leave it. Just wanted to thank you for your opinion, I intended it as open question for anyone to offer their thoughts. Did you delete it?

Reply
Oct 11, 2017 12:29:25   #
Worried for our children Loc: Massachusetts
 
slatten49 wrote:
Statements predicated on fiction are non-admissible, young man.



Dang it... I'm sure I'll find something suitable.

Reply
Oct 11, 2017 12:49:27   #
Radiance3
 
PeterS wrote:
Good question.


===================
Actually gays who want to marry their man counterpart, could buy wedding cake from DQ. DQ could make them beautiful cakes. There are so many other non-Christian stores who could bake wedding cakes for them. But do you know why the LGBT target Christians? Because they know that Christians will not bake them cake. And therefore, they have the reason to SUE them FOR HUNDREDS OF TOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, or even millions of dollars. Then after that they could have very affluent lifestyle along with the lawyers lurking to defend for material gains. These is nothing but plain EXTORTIONS from Christians, of the LGBT community.

This must be made a criminal offense. Unless they go to DQ of others who want to bake cake for them.
DIGUSTING, FILTHY LIFETYLE. I don't like LBGT because of these crimes they try to practice.

Actually for any gay person who don't do this kind of extortion, and live the way they way they are, I think it is fair to treat them like anybody else. But not those gay criminal extortionists.

Reply
Oct 11, 2017 13:08:06   #
no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
 
desparado wrote:
The Christian baker sells cakes to adulters all the Time also people who lie cheat and steal,God says the punishment for sin any sin is death.
Sounds like the baker should stop baking all together





quote=Super Dave]Not at all. Grow up.

The baker didn't refuse to serve the gay couple other than to participate in the wedding.


Now if a gun owner specifically supplied arms for the purpose of killing someone that would make them complicit in murder.

Otherwise your argument is as dumb as most.
The Christian baker sells cakes to adulters all th... (show quote)
[/quote]

This is my response to desparado, I may have connected it to another post.
That is an absurd comparison. No one is asking for a ceremonial cake celebrating his affairs and taking a Christian to court if he is unwilling to validate and sanctify his behavior. Nor is anyone asking for a baker to bake a cake to celebrate a brother and sister marriage or behavior with a dead body.
Realize that the LGBTQ activists are using this form of "disinformation" to control and confuse the thought patterns of those who are not fully grounded on their beliefs of right and wrong.

Reply
 
 
Oct 11, 2017 13:16:51   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
Ve'hoe wrote:
No,,,, I didnt make him say anything,,, nor post an anti-gay religious sects words on his avatar..........to offend others,,,, then pretend he is with them...

typical of the liberal mentality,,, middle finger up to everyone,, no answers,,,, and having you fight his fights,,,


Exactly..

Reply
Oct 11, 2017 13:33:27   #
Ve'hoe
 
When you display comments,,, like the "infidel" patches on our uniforms,,, and the Asalam Alaykum on peterS's posts,,, with the leftist slant,,,,,
the intent is to inflame,,,, the context was then added about islam,,, instead of Christianity,,,,,,,

I did not attack the person,,,, he has offensive statements on his avatar,,,,,, yet pretends to be peaceful and "among the attacked" ie a phony,,,,,,,, all the while he attacks other persons religious opinions,,,, which are covered under the constitution.....

My topic was his phoniness,,,I was not aware that you are in charge of deciding what we talk about,, sorry,, I will check with you first in the future




Worried for our children wrote:
Ok. But what do his signature statements have to do with the topic? The topic is the "message" that I'm referring to. If the topic was muslims/islam, then I could make the connection.

I'm not fighting his fights, he can handle himself just fine. I'm just trying to point out the distinction between attacking the message, and not the person, in an effort to bring OPP toward civility.

Btw, I was looking for another post of yours about my turdnest quote, don't remember what you said exactly, but you thought I should leave it. Just wanted to thank you for your opinion, I intended it as open question for anyone to offer their thoughts. Did you delete it?
Ok. But what do his signature statements have to d... (show quote)

Reply
Oct 11, 2017 14:33:56   #
padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al
 
Kevyn wrote:
The so called right to discriminate in public accommodation was eliminated by the civil rights act, do you realy think that will be overturned?


The civil rights act never intended anyone be forced to compromise their faith to accommodate evil. I do understand that atheist are incapable of being able differentiate between the two, but that is not of our doing.

Reply
Oct 11, 2017 14:42:01   #
padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al
 
Kevyn wrote:
There were many towns in the South prior to the civil rights act where people of color could not rent a home, room or be served a meal. I speaks volumes about the posters character that he wishes to return to this state of injustice.


Kevyn, this is 2017! You act like this is the 1960's. Therefore, you should begin your comment with....."Once upon a time."

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 11 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.