PeterS wrote:
And how do you know what evidence Mueller has or doesn't have? As for what he is investigating. I am sure we will know when he is finished...
The excuse for the raid was that Mueller feared that all the ordered documents wouldn't be forthcoming. He waited a whole day.
Docadhoc wrote:
The excuse for the raid was that Mueller feared that all the ordered documents wouldn't be forthcoming. He waited a whole day.
That wasn't what my comment pertained to...
PeterS wrote:
That wasn't what my comment pertained to...
I'm surprised you recognized the difference.
Mikeyavelli wrote:
Mueller ain't investigating anything.
He's building a phony case to depose Trump. Mueller s assignment is to get Trump impeached and removed from office.
Any way he can. And the sunnuvabitch is doing it.
Trump can't sit around thinking he's innocent of collusion. Mueller knows Trump is innocent of collusion, but he's going to be guilty of something, and Mueller will build it
Traitors.
I think your right. Mueller has no bussiness chairing this "witch Hunt" in the first place. Mueller’s has first-rate credentials. The problem arises in his duty to fairly and without bias evaluate the evidence he gathers. He has had a long and close bond with someone who will surely become a pivotal witness –James Comey. The conflict inevitably discredits whatever conclusion is reached. It renders the entire investigatory exercise suspect, and it only elevates the controversy surrounding it.
It’s not an opinion; the law governing the special counsel (28 CFR 600.7) particularly prohibits him from serving if he has a conflict of interest in the case. The rule has been interpreted to mean that even the appearance of a conflict is sufficient for disqualification.
A conflict of interest is a situation in which an individual has competing interests or loyalties. The conflict itself creates a clash between that individual’s self-interest or bias and his professional or public interest. It calls into question whether he can discharge his responsibilities in a fair, objective and impartial manner. So what exactly is Mueller’s conflict? He and Comey are good friends and former colleagues who worked hand-in-hand at the FBI and Department of Justice for twenty years. Comey regards Mueller as a mentor, while Mueller considers Comey his protégé. When Comey was appointed to succeed Mueller as FBI Director, both men appeared together and were effusive in their praise of one another. Their relationship is not merely a casual one. It is precisely the kind of association which ethical rules are designed to guard against. Which is precisely why there are legal and ethical rules which demand recusal based on prior relationships? It’s quite obvious he not going to recues himself, he should be fired.
Docadhoc wrote:
I'm surprised you recognized the difference.
As usual, you pay no attention to what others say...
nwtk2007 wrote:
I'm hearing other. I can't go into detail, but things might not be so obviously hurtful of Trump. Possibly why he's welcoming the investigation.
I'm looking forward to learning more. Very intriguing.
guitarman wrote:
Robert Mueller doesn't have any evidence on anyone yet. What crime is Mueller investigating?
I am still waiting for the AG/Justice Department to investigate and indict the Clintons, Loretta Lynch, Comey, and Podesta for starters.
nwtk2007 wrote:
Unless they are actually trying to reveal the truth, which in all likelihood, would show the true collusion/Russian connections to be with Obama/Clinton/et al.
Wouldn't it just be great if all this truly did circle back onto them and the DNC??
I think it already HAS!!! I have read a few Articles on that very subject!!!
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.