One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Hillary per Dick Morris
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
Feb 3, 2014 11:59:24   #
Kevyn
 
There is a very good chance that Hillary Clinton will be the next president. Can you imagine how pissed off the Teabaggers are going to be when that happens? There will be public meltdowns with crazy people exploding in anger and hate. The mere mention of her name or sight of her photograph sends them into a mouth foaming fit of rage now what are they going to do when she is sworn into office?

Reply
Feb 3, 2014 12:53:32   #
vernon
 
Kevyn wrote:
Morris is a Fox news commentator who has maligned Hillary Clinton since he was forced to leave the administration for banging hookers. He left fox after clairvointly predicting the Romney landslide victory, now they are looking to take him back as the anti Hillary hatchet man on staff.



i thaught the thread was about hillary and her politics not about morris love life.

Reply
Feb 3, 2014 12:54:25   #
vernon
 
Kevyn wrote:
There is a very good chance that Hillary Clinton will be the next president. Can you imagine how pissed off the Teabaggers are going to be when that happens? There will be public meltdowns with crazy people exploding in anger and hate. The mere mention of her name or sight of her photograph sends them into a mouth foaming fit of rage now what are they going to do when she is sworn into office?


maybe they know something you dont know

Reply
 
 
Feb 3, 2014 13:08:02   #
MrEd Loc: Georgia
 
Brian Devon wrote:
Glad someone besides me remembered the Dick Morris escapades. Some people may have forgotten or never knew. Morris, a married man, certainly frequented call girls. He paid big money to satisfy his sado-masochistic fantasies. He liked to to wear a dog collar and grovel on the floor while wearing a very high priced leash.......down boy...sit...roll over.......

He has been bitter ever since the Clintons dumped his sorry ass. They really had little choice. Dick's adventures as Lassie-boy were splashed all over the media and he became a favorite target of late-night TV comedy writers. I'm sure the Democratic strategists are thinking, "be my guest", should the Republicans choose to cite Dick's "thoughtful" musings on Hillary.
Glad someone besides me remembered the Dick Morris... (show quote)


You know Brian, the normal way to disprove something is to state facts against that argument, not attack the messenger. That is a progressive tactic that is used to destroy, or try to, the person putting the information out. Instead of attacking Dick Morris, how about proving any of this wrong? Any of this should be public record, so it should not be hard to prove wrong. I think if you had anything in the way of facts, you would have used it, but since you don't, all we can do is disregard everything you said. Better luck next time.........

Reply
Feb 3, 2014 15:49:58   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
Kevyn wrote:
Morris is a Fox news commentator who has maligned Hillary Clinton since he was forced to leave the administration for banging hookers. He left fox after clairvointly predicting the Romney landslide victory, now they are looking to take him back as the anti Hillary hatchet man on staff.


Morris was dumped by FOX following the 2012 elections and hasn't been seen on FOX since.

Reply
Feb 3, 2014 15:53:21   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
Kevyn wrote:
There is a very good chance that Hillary Clinton will be the next president. Can you imagine how pissed off the Teabaggers are going to be when that happens? There will be public meltdowns with crazy people exploding in anger and hate. The mere mention of her name or sight of her photograph sends them into a mouth foaming fit of rage now what are they going to do when she is sworn into office?


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Dream on dreamer, dream on.

Reply
Feb 3, 2014 22:39:55   #
Brian Devon
 
MrEd wrote:
You know Brian, the normal way to disprove something is to state facts against that argument, not attack the messenger. That is a progressive tactic that is used to destroy, or try to, the person putting the information out. Instead of attacking Dick Morris, how about proving any of this wrong? Any of this should be public record, so it should not be hard to prove wrong. I think if you had anything in the way of facts, you would have used it, but since you don't, all we can do is disregard everything you said. Better luck next time.........
You know Brian, the normal way to disprove somethi... (show quote)




Its not quite that simple. Ever heard the expression: consider the source. The credentials of a source are always important. Does the person have a long history of truth telling or are they, in fact, known as a liar.

Would Americans rely on Joseph McCarthy as a source of a news story...or would they have felt a story had more reliability if it came from Walter Cronkite?

I think we all know the answer to that one.

Reply
 
 
Feb 3, 2014 22:54:37   #
vernon
 
Brian Devon wrote:
Its not quite that simple. Ever heard the expression: consider the source. The credentials of a source are always important. Does the person have a long history of truth telling or are they, in fact, known as a liar.

Would Americans rely on Joseph McCarthy as a source of a news story...or would they have felt a story had more reliability if it came from Walter Cronkite?

I think we all know the answer to that one.


are you saying you can tell when someone on here that you have never met is a liar.

Reply
Feb 3, 2014 22:58:08   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
Brian Devon wrote:
Its not quite that simple. Ever heard the expression: consider the source. The credentials of a source are always important. Does the person have a long history of truth telling or are they, in fact, known as a liar.

Would Americans rely on Joseph McCarthy as a source of a news story...or would they have felt a story had more reliability if it came from Walter Cronkite?

I think we all know the answer to that one.


Cronkite was not that reliable. He often colored his 'newscasts' with his own biased opinions.

Reply
Feb 3, 2014 22:59:14   #
Brian Devon
 
vernon wrote:
are you saying you can tell when someone on here that you have never met is a liar.



Not at all. I'm just pointing out that some people use resources that are famous for being "sketchy" like Dick Morris or Joe McCarthy.

Reply
Feb 3, 2014 23:04:47   #
vernon
 
Old_Gringo wrote:
Cronkite was not that reliable. He often colored his 'newscasts' with his own biased opinions.


mc carthy had a number done on him murrow and the press ean with it.he uncovered many communist in govt and hollywood.

Reply
 
 
Feb 3, 2014 23:09:58   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
vernon wrote:
mc carthy had a number done on him murrow and the press ean with it.he uncovered many communist in govt and hollywood.


:thumbup:

Reply
Feb 3, 2014 23:12:15   #
Brian Devon
 
vernon wrote:
mc carthy had a number done on him murrow and the press ean with it.he uncovered many communist in govt and hollywood.



Joe McCarthy was the biggest enemy of Joe McCarthy. He went down in political flames when he accused President Eisenhower of being a communist. McCarthy died a reviled discredited drunk and was one of only 4 U.S. Senators in this nation's history to be censured. When American school-children get their lessons on the dangers of fear mongering, the whiskey soaked McCarthy is exhibit A. He is widely considered to be the worst senator in U.S. history.

You won't find any airports or public schools named after him.

Reply
Feb 3, 2014 23:15:57   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
Brian Devon wrote:
Joe McCarthy was the biggest enemy of Joe McCarthy. He went down in political flames when he accused President Eisenhower of being a communist. McCarthy died a reviled discredited drunk and was one of only 4 U.S. Senators in this nation's history to be censured When American school-children get their lessons on the dangers of fear mongering, the whiskey soaked McCarthy is exhibit A.


You are evidently too young to have lived in the fifties with any knowledge of what actually occurred. All you know is the revisionist history peddled by the left leaning journalists of the day.

Reply
Feb 3, 2014 23:24:03   #
Brian Devon
 
Old_Gringo wrote:
You are evidently too young to have lived in the fifties with any knowledge of what actually occurred. All you know is the revisionist history peddled by the left leaning journalists of the day.



Actually I know a lot of what occurred in the 50s. My parents kept me very apprised of the far right's paranoia and their ability to destroy countless lives. I also learned about McCarthyism in public school, college, and in books. There are very valid reasons that McCarthy is such a despised villain. His infamy was well earned.

There are reasons Americans don't get too excited when some neanderthal starts salivating and throwing around words like pinko or commie. The cold war is over. Both the USSR and Joe have been buried. J.Edgar Closet-queen, too.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.