One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Does this sound very familiar?
Jun 15, 2017 17:52:46   #
ldsuttonjr Loc: ShangriLa
 
On 10 February 2015, the New York Times re-released the first article they ever published about Adolf Hitler, who was then the chairman of the Nazi party. The story, dated 21 November 1922 and republished in the Times‘ “First Glimpses” section, opened with this introduction:
On Nov. 21, 1922, The New York Times gave its readers their first glimpse of Hitler, in a profile that got a lot of things right — its description of his ability to work a crowd into a fever pitch, ready then and there to stage a coup, presaged his unsuccessful beer hall putsch less than a year later. But the article also got one crucial point very wrong — despite what “several reliable, well-informed sources” told The Times in the third paragraph from the bottom, his anti-Semitism was every bit as genuine and violent as it sounded.
This re-release was widely covered by other news outlets immediately after it was posted in 2015, with many of them suggesting or implying its description bore similarities to the political movement of then-presidential candidate Donald Trump.
An excerpt from that 1922 article reads as follows:
But several reliable, well-informed sources confirmed the idea that Hitler’s anti-Semitism was not so genuine or violent as it sounded, and that he was merely using anti-Semitic propaganda as a bait to catch masses of followers and keep them aroused, enthusiastic, and in line for the time when his organization is perfected and sufficiently powerful to be employed effectively for political purposes.
A sophisticated politician credited Hitler with peculiar political cleverness for laying emphasis and over-emphasis on anti-Semitism, saying: “You can’t expect the masses to understand or appreciate your finer real aims. You must feed the masses with cruder morsels and ideas like anti-Semitism. It would be politically all wrong to tell them the truth about where you really are leading them.”
This story was published early in both Hitler’s career and in the existence of the Nazi party itself, whose followers were then called ‘Hakenkreuzler,’ or ‘swastika wavers.’ In November 1922, when this article was first published, Hitler had been Nazi party chairman for just over a year, and it had been only three years since he had delivered his first public political speech. Hitler’s failed attempt to overthrow the local government in Bavaria, known as the “Beer Hall Putsch,” was one year away.
The Times reached out to Hitler for comment in 1922, which he declined, as described in the story:
“Herr Hitler regrets he is unable to meet you as he is leaving town on important business for several days,” was the answer received by The New York Times correspondent. His important business was going to Regensburg with three special trainloads of Munich admirers for the purpose of holding a series of reactionary inflammatory meetings and incidentally to beat up protesting Socialists and Communists with blackjacks if any dare protest, which is becoming increasingly rarer.

Reply
Jun 16, 2017 11:15:43   #
Randy131 Loc: Florida
 
"...admirers (Obama's "Antifa') for the purpose of holding a series of reactionary inflammatory meetings and incidentally to beat up protesting Socialists and Communists with blackjacks (using fascist tactics) if any dare protest, which is becoming increasingly rarer."

The irony here is that it is now those "Socialists and Communists" (synonymous with liberals, progressives, and Democrats) who are using the fascist tactics against "Sharia Law Protestors" all across the USA, and now also the shooting of their opposition, the Republicans.

These new modern fascists don't protest, they riot, destroying property and injuring the innocent, while depriving Americans their "Free Speech" constitutional rights, demanding segregation and safety zones for themselves. Truly amazing how Hitler and Nazi like these liberals, progressives, and Democrats have become since completely empbracing socialism, communism, and fascist methods to get their way.

Actions prove intent, and as Jesus said, "You can tell a tree by the fruit that it bears," and all the aforementioned is the fruit of the liberals, progressives, and Democrats (synonymous with socialists, communists, and modern day fascists), and we know them by what they demand and what they riot for.

Now what has President Trump and any of his supporters ever done to be linked to this article, please give specific incidences showing any Nazi fascist tactics used by them, as we have very many incidences from the rioting and looting by the liberals, progressives, and Democrats, including violent mass shootings of Americans, as in the latest incident of Republicans being shot by a liberal Democrat during their baseball practice, and an older incident of Gabby Gifford, and many others at her community meeting, being shot by a liberal Democrat.

The only violence that has ever occurred at a Trump rally was by paid liberal goons, paid by Democratic organizations to attack Trump supporters in order to disrupt their rallies, and this has been proven through leaked e-mails from these Democratic organizations.

Liberals, progressives, and Democrats have conducted so very many protests since the election of President Trump, yet nobody has been hurt or attacked during them, until they turn into riots and the police, who have done all the hurting trying to control the rioters, are brought in. Yet most of conservative, Christian, and Republican protests, the few that there have been, which none have turned into riots, but many have been attacked and people seriously hurt by liberal goons.

So which are the most similar to what happened in Nazi Germany?



ldsuttonjr wrote:
On 10 February 2015, the New York Times re-released the first article they ever published about Adolf Hitler, who was then the chairman of the Nazi party. The story, dated 21 November 1922 and republished in the Times‘ “First Glimpses” section, opened with this introduction:
On Nov. 21, 1922, The New York Times gave its readers their first glimpse of Hitler, in a profile that got a lot of things right — its description of his ability to work a crowd into a fever pitch, ready then and there to stage a coup, presaged his unsuccessful beer hall putsch less than a year later. But the article also got one crucial point very wrong — despite what “several reliable, well-informed sources” told The Times in the third paragraph from the bottom, his anti-Semitism was every bit as genuine and violent as it sounded.
This re-release was widely covered by other news outlets immediately after it was posted in 2015, with many of them suggesting or implying its description bore similarities to the political movement of then-presidential candidate Donald Trump.
An excerpt from that 1922 article reads as follows:
But several reliable, well-informed sources confirmed the idea that Hitler’s anti-Semitism was not so genuine or violent as it sounded, and that he was merely using anti-Semitic propaganda as a bait to catch masses of followers and keep them aroused, enthusiastic, and in line for the time when his organization is perfected and sufficiently powerful to be employed effectively for political purposes.
A sophisticated politician credited Hitler with peculiar political cleverness for laying emphasis and over-emphasis on anti-Semitism, saying: “You can’t expect the masses to understand or appreciate your finer real aims. You must feed the masses with cruder morsels and ideas like anti-Semitism. It would be politically all wrong to tell them the truth about where you really are leading them.”
This story was published early in both Hitler’s career and in the existence of the Nazi party itself, whose followers were then called ‘Hakenkreuzler,’ or ‘swastika wavers.’ In November 1922, when this article was first published, Hitler had been Nazi party chairman for just over a year, and it had been only three years since he had delivered his first public political speech. Hitler’s failed attempt to overthrow the local government in Bavaria, known as the “Beer Hall Putsch,” was one year away.
The Times reached out to Hitler for comment in 1922, which he declined, as described in the story:
“Herr Hitler regrets he is unable to meet you as he is leaving town on important business for several days,” was the answer received by The New York Times correspondent. His important business was going to Regensburg with three special trainloads of Munich admirers for the purpose of holding a series of reactionary inflammatory meetings and incidentally to beat up protesting Socialists and Communists with blackjacks if any dare protest, which is becoming increasingly rarer.
On 10 February 2015, the New York Times re-release... (show quote)

Reply
Jun 16, 2017 15:19:08   #
Hogback
 
ldsuttonjr wrote:
On 10 February 2015, the New York Times re-released the first article they ever published about Adolf Hitler, who was then the chairman of the Nazi party. The story, dated 21 November 1922 and republished in the Times‘ “First Glimpses” section, opened with this introduction:
On Nov. 21, 1922, The New York Times gave its readers their first glimpse of Hitler, in a profile that got a lot of things right — its description of his ability to work a crowd into a fever pitch, ready then and there to stage a coup, presaged his unsuccessful beer hall putsch less than a year later. But the article also got one crucial point very wrong — despite what “several reliable, well-informed sources” told The Times in the third paragraph from the bottom, his anti-Semitism was every bit as genuine and violent as it sounded.
This re-release was widely covered by other news outlets immediately after it was posted in 2015, with many of them suggesting or implying its description bore similarities to the political movement of then-presidential candidate Donald Trump.
An excerpt from that 1922 article reads as follows:
But several reliable, well-informed sources confirmed the idea that Hitler’s anti-Semitism was not so genuine or violent as it sounded, and that he was merely using anti-Semitic propaganda as a bait to catch masses of followers and keep them aroused, enthusiastic, and in line for the time when his organization is perfected and sufficiently powerful to be employed effectively for political purposes.
A sophisticated politician credited Hitler with peculiar political cleverness for laying emphasis and over-emphasis on anti-Semitism, saying: “You can’t expect the masses to understand or appreciate your finer real aims. You must feed the masses with cruder morsels and ideas like anti-Semitism. It would be politically all wrong to tell them the truth about where you really are leading them.”
This story was published early in both Hitler’s career and in the existence of the Nazi party itself, whose followers were then called ‘Hakenkreuzler,’ or ‘swastika wavers.’ In November 1922, when this article was first published, Hitler had been Nazi party chairman for just over a year, and it had been only three years since he had delivered his first public political speech. Hitler’s failed attempt to overthrow the local government in Bavaria, known as the “Beer Hall Putsch,” was one year away.
The Times reached out to Hitler for comment in 1922, which he declined, as described in the story:
“Herr Hitler regrets he is unable to meet you as he is leaving town on important business for several days,” was the answer received by The New York Times correspondent. His important business was going to Regensburg with three special trainloads of Munich admirers for the purpose of holding a series of reactionary inflammatory meetings and incidentally to beat up protesting Socialists and Communists with blackjacks if any dare protest, which is becoming increasingly rarer.
On 10 February 2015, the New York Times re-release... (show quote)


The New York Times are Holocaust deniers also. Although owned and ran by Jews they always have plenty of ink for negative press about Israel and the Jews. AMAZING!!

Reply
 
 
Jun 16, 2017 19:49:21   #
Louie27 Loc: Peoria, AZ
 
Randy131 wrote:
"...admirers (Obama's "Antifa') for the purpose of holding a series of reactionary inflammatory meetings and incidentally to beat up protesting Socialists and Communists with blackjacks (using fascist tactics) if any dare protest, which is becoming increasingly rarer."

The irony here is that it is now those "Socialists and Communists" (synonymous with liberals, progressives, and Democrats) who are using the fascist tactics against "Sharia Law Protestors" all across the USA, and now also the shooting of their opposition, the Republicans.

These new modern fascists don't protest, they riot, destroying property and injuring the innocent, while depriving Americans their "Free Speech" constitutional rights, demanding segregation and safety zones for themselves. Truly amazing how Hitler and Nazi like these liberals, progressives, and Democrats have become since completely empbracing socialism, communism, and fascist methods to get their way.

Actions prove intent, and as Jesus said, "You can tell a tree by the fruit that it bears," and all the aforementioned is the fruit of the liberals, progressives, and Democrats (synonymous with socialists, communists, and modern day fascists), and we know them by what they demand and what they riot for.

Now what has President Trump and any of his supporters ever done to be linked to this article, please give specific incidences showing any Nazi fascist tactics used by them, as we have very many incidences from the rioting and looting by the liberals, progressives, and Democrats, including violent mass shootings of Americans, as in the latest incident of Republicans being shot by a liberal Democrat during their baseball practice, and an older incident of Gabby Gifford, and many others at her community meeting, being shot by a liberal Democrat.

The only violence that has ever occurred at a Trump rally was by paid liberal goons, paid by Democratic organizations to attack Trump supporters in order to disrupt their rallies, and this has been proven through leaked e-mails from these Democratic organizations.

Liberals, progressives, and Democrats have conducted so very many protests since the election of President Trump, yet nobody has been hurt or attacked during them, until they turn into riots and the police, who have done all the hurting trying to control the rioters, are brought in. Yet most of conservative, Christian, and Republican protests, the few that there have been, which none have turned into riots, but many have been attacked and people seriously hurt by liberal goons.

So which are the most similar to what happened in Nazi Germany?
"...admirers (Obama's "Antifa') for the ... (show quote)



Please! Please! Tell us who it is. I believe none of the Democrats/communists will get the question correct.

Reply
Jun 17, 2017 06:36:41   #
Randy131 Loc: Florida
 
If the liberals, progessives, and Democrats are too stupid to realize who it is, after all that's been publicly done just since President Trump was elected President, back in November of 2016, then they're too stupid to realize it even when they are called out and the evidence is put right under their noses.

How can this be proven? By the person who made the original post and accusation that the guilty Naxi fascist like people are President Trump's supporters, without an ounce of proof or even just one incident that would indicate his false accusations were true, who has never even tried to deny my post, but as all socialists, communists, and fascists (synonymous with liberals, progressives, and fascists) do when they are exposed and called out, they run and hide.

Haven't you noticed that pattern of theirs before this? When the proof hits them in the face, they become as quiet as a "church mouse".

Have you also noticed how the liberal biased mainstream media have also toned it down quite a bit ever since they radicalized that Democrat into shooting those Republicans, gathered to practice for a charitable event? Even they know what they've been doing, and now that people are losing their lives over their words and actions, they too are becoming quiet as a "church mouse".

The American people need to put the blame on the guilty and call them out, and let the liberal biased mainstream media, and all the Democrats in the US Congress, know that we know who the guilty really are in that attempted mass murder shooting of those five Republicans, and it is the person looking back at them when they stand in front of a mirror.



Louie27 wrote:

Please! Please! Tell us who it is. I believe none of the Democrats/communists will get the question correct.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.