ldsuttonjr Loc: ShangriLa

Hard hitting details presented in short video.

Worthwhile reminder of who was dealing with Russia.





.@Liz_Wheeler: We finally have proof of inappropriate financial dealings with Russia



.@Liz_Wheeler: We finally have proof of inappropriate financial dealings wi...
Follow Liz on Twitter: @Liz_Wheeler

Louie27 Loc: Peoria, AZ

But who is mentioned in these dealings. You failed to state the obvious reason for this statement.

pafret Loc: Northeast

Shortest video on record -- non-existent. A few items might be of interest, like who inappropriately dealt with Russians, when was this done, what was inappropriate about it.

To date the only public evidence of inappropriate dealing with Russians is between them and Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton and John Podesta. Much earlier, Edward Kennedy had treasonous dealings with Russia but we can't prosecute him, the bastard died.

ldsuttonjr Loc: ShangriLa

louie27: try copying the attachment and opening it!!!!!

Louie27 Loc: Peoria, AZ

Randy131 Loc: Florida

What a bunch of BS! All the Democrats and Hillary Clinton have is unfounded accusations blaming the Russians for doing what? If the Russians did something to interfere in our Presidential election, what was it, and where is the proof of what they claim that the Russians did?

The liberals are always saying that the illegal immigrants in our country have the same rights as our citizens, and one of those rights is the assumption of innocense until proven guilty, so don't the Russians deserve the same rights as the liberals give to all the illegal immigrants in our country? So where is the proof of anything that the Russians did to interfere in our Presidential election.

Obama started an investigation into the supposed Russian interference in our Presidential election back in June 2016, ordering all of our 17 intelligence agencies to investigate the interference claims and report it to the American people, but it's been almost a year now and no evidence has been provided to prove these false accusations.

Julian Assange and his Wikileaks organization has been releasing leaked information about what our governments have been doing behind our backs, much illegally, for over 11 years now, and not once has anything they've said or information that they released have been proven a lie or false information, too bad Obama and Hillary Clinton can't honestly say the same.

Julian Assange has said several times that the DNC and Clinton campaign e-mails were not given to Wikileaks by the Russians, but instead was leaked to them by an IT employee at the DNC. Seth Rich was the #2 IT employee at the DNC, and less than a week after Wikileaks started disseminating to the public the DNC and Clinton campaign e-mails, he was mysteriously murdered on a street a block from his home. Seth Rich was killed by being shot in the back twice and left for dead, with nothing taken off his person, such as his very expensive cell phone, his very expensive watch, the jewelry that he was wearing that had values of well over $2,000.00, and his wallet, with many high end credit cards and a high amount of cash, was not touched.

Seth Rich was taken to a hospital where his condition was stabalized, but still a couple of hours later he mysteriously died in the hospital. Upon his death, Julian Assange offered a reward of $20,000.00 through Wikileaks, for any information that would lead to the arrest and conviction of anyone involved in the killing of Seth Rich. Why did they do this, and what was their connection with Seth Rich?

John Podesta claimed that the Russians hacked the DNC computers, but a request from the FBI to investigate those computers was denied by him and Hillary Clinton. Why?

If anyone would have copied the huge trove of DNC and Clinton campaign e-mails, that Wikileaks had released to the public, it could have been easily found by checking all the DNC computers, and upon finding which computer copied all those e-mails, all that had to be done to discover the culprit who copied them and leaked them to Wikileaks, was to check who was assigned to that computer. The FBI could have learned this very easily, but was refused the access to those computers. Why?

Did someone not want the FBI to know who copied the e-mails, and leaked them to Wikileaks, because they had already taken action for retribution against that person, and then planned on blaming the Russians for hacking their computers, with absolutely no proof or evidence that the Russians had done so, and without checking the DNC computers, it could never be determined that the Russians didn't hack those computers. But the FBI has Seth Rich's personal laptop computer, and they have discovered that all the DNC and Clinton campaign e-mails that was released to the public by Wikileaks, is also on Seth Rich's personal computer.

So many accusations! So many lies! Where is the proof of anything that the Democrats, Hillary Clinton, and John Podesta have claimed, but refused to allow the FBI to investigate? Think about it for a minute. If Seth Rich was the leaker of the DNC and Clinton campaign e-mails, as Julian Assange and Wikileaks insinuates, then the Russians did not hack the DNC computers, and if they didn't hack the DNC computers, then there is no reason to assume that the Russians colluded with President Trump to help him win the Presidential elections.

Just more liberal lies, one would think after 8 years of the Obama administration, the American people would be wise by now of these kind of lies and accusations that supposedly benefit only the Democrats. How soon we've forgotten how Obama and the Democrats knowingly lied about Obamacare, in order to get it passed into law.

silvereagle

Dealings with Russia,humm was her name Killary?

PRM2014

Yeah; lies and accusations that supposedly benefit only the Democrats. How soon we've forgotten how Obama and the Democrats knowingly lied about Obamacare, in order to get it passed into law. Thanks to Jonathan Gruber, and Nancy Polosi we have to pass it so we can find out what's in it. That should have been one BIG RED FLAG, not going to help anyone. All it did was make a BIG mess, worthless, Gruber said just lie to those stupid voters they won't know what it is about until all the lies are revealed then it's to late.

And the Republicans aren't doing what they said eight years ago, they lied, when they said they had a replacement for Obama Care, LIE.
Not any better than Jonathan Gruber, or any politicians.

Randy131 Loc: Florida

The Republicans did have a replacement for Obamacare, about 6 or 7 of them, and they can't get together to narrow it down to just one, but at least what the present, they allow everyone to read before requiring idiots to vote on something they haven't yet read and know nothing about what is in it, like the Democrats did in passing Obamacare.

Louie27 Loc: Peoria, AZ

PRM2014

I agree; if they would get things together and make it happen. And for sure let everyone read it before they pass it like the Democrats did.
Barack Hussein Obama's patient protection and affordable care act that was/not affordable. Remember the "lies" going to save 2,500/year per family "LIE". If you like your insurance you can keep it. If you like your doctor you can keep your doctor"LIE"

My hope is the Republicans can get on the ball and get it done.

Randy131 Loc: Florida

They will, the bill is in the Senate right now, where they'll make changes, then both Houses of Congress will come together and compromise to come up with a bill that they will pass, without a single Democrat to help them. The Democrats did not let anyone read Obamacare before they forced Congress to vote on it, so far everyone has had the chance to read the Republicans bill before being asked to vote on it.

silvereagle

The repukes have no intention of passing a new healthcare bill.When all said and done they will come out with the we tried bullshit.Nothing has changed in the last 60 years.

Randy131 Loc: Florida

You know something, most people don't care, because healthcare insurance was much more affordable before the federal government stuck it's nose into it, and would be again if the federal government would honor the 'US Constitution', and only get involved in what the 'US Constitution' mandates that they are allowed to get involved in. As far as getting rid of Obamacare, they need to do nothing, it is destroying itself because it is a terribly flawed law, financially imploding, and was said to, and lied about also, being 'Funding Neutral'.

There is no real freedom in the USA when the federal government can mandate what Americans must purchase, for it is their health and life that is affected and is supposed to be their decision to make, as our 'Declaration of Independence' declares our Creator's (GOD) endowed unalienable right to the 'Pursuit of Happiness', which is simply our right to the decision and choice of what is best for ourselves, whether it truly be or not, and allowed to pursue our decision and choice, instead of a government elitists telling us what is best for us, then forcing us to accept their decision and choice, over that of our own, through penalty of an illegal tax, because it is not required of every American citizen, especially those with employer provided insurance, which makes it completely unfair for all.

teabag09

Not soon enough. May the bastard roast in HELL! Mike