When a soft target makes the news in this country, what should happen to the 9th court, 4th court and that judge in Hawaii who took it upon themselves to ignore reality?
cesspool jones wrote:
When a soft target makes the news in this country, what should happen to the 9th court, 4th court and that judge in Hawaii who took it upon themselves to ignore reality?
Prosecute them and then lock them up. They are obviously slow learners and need to go over the constitution and other laws already in place that pertain to the presidency of America.
cesspool jones wrote:
When a soft target makes the news in this country, what should happen to the 9th court, 4th court and that judge in Hawaii who took it upon themselves to ignore reality?
I'm upset because I never voted for any judge to be running America.
Judicial activism has been growing for years. Now with support from the left it is out of control.
EL wrote:
I'm upset because I never voted for any judge to be running America.
JFlorio wrote:
Judicial activism has been growing for years. Now with support from the left it is out of control.
I'm pretty sure it is going to be reigned in.
cesspool jones wrote:
When a soft target makes the news in this country, what should happen to the 9th court, 4th court and that judge in Hawaii who took it upon themselves to ignore reality?
Regarding "that judge in Hawaii;" Hawaii is part of the Ninth Circuit. If the judge was Federal, so was he.
cesspool jones wrote:
I didn't know that Loki
The Ninth is huge. It also includes our Pacific territories.
cesspool jones wrote:
When a soft target makes the news in this country, what should happen to the 9th court, 4th court and that judge in Hawaii who took it upon themselves to ignore reality?
Make them fiscally responsible, and have them charged with reckless endangerment.
bahmer wrote:
Prosecute them and then lock them up. They are obviously slow learners and need to go over the constitution and other laws already in place that pertain to the presidency of America.
They did go over the laws and the constitution. That is the very reason they stopped the ban. Un constitutional.
ginger wrote:
They did go over the laws and the constitution. That is the very reason they stopped the ban. Un constitutional.
Do you see a problem with that?
typical 'erroneous" libturd reply!
trump is the "President".....not a libturd flunkie, robotically performing his job as a party stooge......like 'sooooo, many libturds"!
If you Libtards, "knew" the Constitution, you might be doing something "useful", today, instead of speaking like a "fish"!
EISENHOWER, DID THE SAME, TYPE OF "SAFEGUARD"!.....{ INTELLIGENT, & PATRIOTIC PRESIDENTS! }
IT'S THE "LIBERALS, THAT NEED TO BE EVICTED FROM AMERICA!"!
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.