One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
liberal judges
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
May 27, 2017 10:19:29   #
cesspool jones Loc: atlanta
 
When a soft target makes the news in this country, what should happen to the 9th court, 4th court and that judge in Hawaii who took it upon themselves to ignore reality?

Reply
May 27, 2017 10:21:44   #
bahmer
 
cesspool jones wrote:
When a soft target makes the news in this country, what should happen to the 9th court, 4th court and that judge in Hawaii who took it upon themselves to ignore reality?


Prosecute them and then lock them up. They are obviously slow learners and need to go over the constitution and other laws already in place that pertain to the presidency of America.

Reply
May 27, 2017 10:31:41   #
EL Loc: Massachusetts
 
cesspool jones wrote:
When a soft target makes the news in this country, what should happen to the 9th court, 4th court and that judge in Hawaii who took it upon themselves to ignore reality?


I'm upset because I never voted for any judge to be running America.

Reply
 
 
May 27, 2017 10:35:07   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
Judicial activism has been growing for years. Now with support from the left it is out of control.
EL wrote:
I'm upset because I never voted for any judge to be running America.

Reply
May 27, 2017 10:37:19   #
cesspool jones Loc: atlanta
 
JFlorio wrote:
Judicial activism has been growing for years. Now with support from the left it is out of control.


I'm pretty sure it is going to be reigned in.

Reply
May 27, 2017 10:38:46   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
cesspool jones wrote:
When a soft target makes the news in this country, what should happen to the 9th court, 4th court and that judge in Hawaii who took it upon themselves to ignore reality?

Regarding "that judge in Hawaii;" Hawaii is part of the Ninth Circuit. If the judge was Federal, so was he.

Reply
May 27, 2017 10:45:02   #
cesspool jones Loc: atlanta
 
Loki wrote:
Regarding "that judge in Hawaii;" Hawaii is part of the Ninth Circuit. If the judge was Federal, so was he.


I didn't know that Loki

Reply
 
 
May 27, 2017 10:48:09   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
cesspool jones wrote:
I didn't know that Loki


The Ninth is huge. It also includes our Pacific territories.

Reply
May 27, 2017 11:03:04   #
Big Bass
 
cesspool jones wrote:
When a soft target makes the news in this country, what should happen to the 9th court, 4th court and that judge in Hawaii who took it upon themselves to ignore reality?


Make them fiscally responsible, and have them charged with reckless endangerment.

Reply
May 27, 2017 11:27:22   #
Ronald Hatt Loc: Lansing, Mich
 
LEGISLATION, NEEDS TO BE IN PLACE TO DEAL WITH JUDGES THAT TRY TO LEGISLATE FROM THE BENCH!....{REMOVAL?}.....BY WHOM?

THE SAME COULD BE SAID FOR "RABBLE ROUSING LIBTURDS", THAT SERVE ONLY TO "MUCK THINGS UP", WITH NEVER ENDING BASELESS CHARGES, AGAINST CONSERVATISM.......

THE "NEVER TRUMPERS", SHOULD BE SENT TO THE "PHILLIPINES", WHERE THEIR PRESIDENT, KNOWS HOW TO DEAL WITH THESE INSANE LIBTURDS, & DEFUNCT PRESS!


Reply
May 27, 2017 11:39:42   #
ginger
 
bahmer wrote:
Prosecute them and then lock them up. They are obviously slow learners and need to go over the constitution and other laws already in place that pertain to the presidency of America.


They did go over the laws and the constitution. That is the very reason they stopped the ban. Un constitutional.

Reply
 
 
May 27, 2017 11:41:08   #
cesspool jones Loc: atlanta
 
ginger wrote:
They did go over the laws and the constitution. That is the very reason they stopped the ban. Un constitutional.


Do you see a problem with that?

Reply
May 27, 2017 11:58:35   #
Ronald Hatt Loc: Lansing, Mich
 
typical 'erroneous" libturd reply!

trump is the "President".....not a libturd flunkie, robotically performing his job as a party stooge......like 'sooooo, many libturds"!

If you Libtards, "knew" the Constitution, you might be doing something "useful", today, instead of speaking like a "fish"!

Reply
May 27, 2017 12:32:18   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
God your dumb. Carter specifically stopped refugees and or immigrants from Iran interring the US. This authority is given to the President.
http://immigrationimpact.com/2014/09/03/136-law-professors-say-president-has-legal-authority-to-act-on-immigration/


ginger wrote:
They did go over the laws and the constitution. That is the very reason they stopped the ban. Un constitutional.

Reply
May 27, 2017 12:40:26   #
Ronald Hatt Loc: Lansing, Mich
 
EISENHOWER, DID THE SAME, TYPE OF "SAFEGUARD"!.....{ INTELLIGENT, & PATRIOTIC PRESIDENTS! }

IT'S THE "LIBERALS, THAT NEED TO BE EVICTED FROM AMERICA!"!

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.