One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Treason inside the Beltway?
May 26, 2017 15:20:17   #
Gatsby
 
President Trump shared top secret informantion, about Islamic State terror plots, with top Russians; as was, and is, his perrogative.

It seems reasonable that president Trump shared this information, about a common threat, as a step towards improved relations

and cooperation in the fight against a common enemy, the Islamic State.

The U.S. press condems President Trump, then promptly discloses that very same top secret information,

as well as the source, to the Islamic State. Next, the British government shares highly sensitive information

with U.S. Intelligence, only to see that information, including classified photos, appearing in the U.S. press.

The agent (of the U.S. government) that leaked the information, which he (or she) knew to be highly classified,

and did so with full reason to belive that the information would be published, and thus provided to our enemies.

The reporter who turned in this story had full reason to know that this was officially restricted information,

and that its release might reasonably be expected to be of benefit to our enemies.

The editor that approved publication had full reason to know the same: Yet all went ahead and provided information

to the Islamic state that they had reason to know could cause serious harm to the security of the United States of America.

Why should this not be considered conspiracy to commit an act of treason against the government,

and the people, of the United States of America?

Reply
May 26, 2017 15:23:56   #
bahmer
 
Gatsby wrote:
President Trump shared top secret informantion, about Islamic State terror plots, with top Russians; as was, and is, his perrogative.

It seems reasonable that president Trump shared this information, about a common threat, as a step towards improved relations

and cooperation in the fight against a common enemy, the Islamic State.

The U.S. press condems President Trump, then promptly discloses that very same top secret information,

as well as the source, to the Islamic State. Next, the British government shares highly sensitive information

with U.S. Intelligence, only to see that information, including classified photos, appearing in the U.S. press.

The agent (of the U.S. government) that leaked the information, which he (or she) knew to be highly classified,

and did so with full reason to belive that the information would be published, and thus provided to our enemies.

The reporter who turned in this story had full reason to know that this was officially restricted information,

and that its release might reasonably be expected to be of benefit to our enemies.

The editor that approved publication had full reason to know the same: Yet all went ahead and provided information

to the Islamic state that they had reason to know could cause serious harm to the security of the United States of America.

Why should this not be considered conspiracy to commit an act of treason against the government,

and the people, of the United States of America?
President Trump shared top secret informantion, ab... (show quote)


It should, and all persons should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

Reply
May 26, 2017 15:26:16   #
Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere
 
bahmer wrote:
It should, and all persons should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.


Then shot.

Reply
 
 
May 26, 2017 15:51:21   #
robmull Loc: florida
 
Docadhoc wrote:
Then shot.







That's the ticket, Docadhoc. Treason in time of war {declared or not} IS a Capital Offense, punishable by death. Even all the unsecured "C" {"whatever THAT means"} emails that were flying all over the world, {"intentional" {Comey}, or not}, that have certainly put many lives in danger of being uncovered by the enemy, IS treason, and should be dealt-with accordingly. Hummmmmmmmmmmmm. GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO PRESIDENT "45" DONALD J. {BORN AGAIN} TRUMP (R); JUST LIKE THE WEATHER!!!

Reply
May 26, 2017 15:51:38   #
Carol Kelly
 
Gatsby wrote:
President Trump shared top secret informantion, about Islamic State terror plots, with top Russians; as was, and is, his perrogative.

It seems reasonable that president Trump shared this information, about a common threat, as a step towards improved relations

and cooperation in the fight against a common enemy, the Islamic State.

The U.S. press condems President Trump, then promptly discloses that very same top secret information,

as well as the source, to the Islamic State. Next, the British government shares highly sensitive information

with U.S. Intelligence, only to see that information, including classified photos, appearing in the U.S. press.

The agent (of the U.S. government) that leaked the information, which he (or she) knew to be highly classified,

and did so with full reason to belive that the information would be published, and thus provided to our enemies.

The reporter who turned in this story had full reason to know that this was officially restricted information,

and that its release might reasonably be expected to be of benefit to our enemies.

The editor that approved publication had full reason to know the same: Yet all went ahead and provided information

to the Islamic state that they had reason to know could cause serious harm to the security of the United States of America.

Why should this not be considered conspiracy to commit an act of treason against the government,

and the people, of the United States of America?
President Trump shared top secret informantion, ab... (show quote)


And to the Security of Great Britain.

Reply
May 26, 2017 23:37:50   #
Gatsby
 
It appears that the first three heads are about to go for a roll.
http://conservatives4palin.com/2017/05/white-house-identifies-leakers-of-classified-information.html

bahmer wrote:
It should, and all persons should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

Reply
May 26, 2017 23:55:14   #
Bug58
 
The information shared by President Trump had been released previously, by the Department of Homeland Security.

It was about laptops being used as bombs, well, if you've flown over the past few months you would know that TSA Agents have been requiring laptops to be scanned separately. But certainly, it was WISE of the President to share such information with a world leader, consider if a terrorist boarded a Russian Airliner with American's or citizens of other nations traveling on those planes and used their laptop as a bomb, and the Russian security didn't know to check it, and plane blows up. Wouldn't the President and any other world leader (or intel person who knew of the threat and remained silent) be an accomplice if they withheld that information?

I wonder what those media types would have been screaming if one of their family members or associates would have been on such a plane if something like that took place. "They had evidence this was a threat and didn't share it"?? Then they would want to know who knew what when? And why wasn't this put out to the public?

In such cases, YOU SHARE information..lest you be at least in part responsible for any deaths and live with the knowledge you knew this was a possibility and said nothing..those deaths are on your head, your guilty conscience.

Reply
 
 
May 27, 2017 03:56:34   #
Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere
 
Gatsby wrote:


These scum need to be prosecuted to the fullest extent possible, but first they need to be waterboarded until they give up everything they know of including everything being done against Trump and who is doing it.

I don't want them fired so they can skip out. I want them arrested now before Trump returns. I'd give them a choice. Spill your guts or you'll be handed over to No Nose Novello for questioning. And No Nose is always in a bad mood.

Reply
May 27, 2017 04:31:13   #
Gatsby
 
Keel hauling, aircraft carrier style, comes to mind.
Docadhoc wrote:
These scum need to be prosecuted to the fullest extent possible, but first they need to be waterboarded until they give up everything they know of including everything being done against Trump and who is doing it.

I don't want them fired so they can skip out. I want them arrested now before Trump returns. I'd give them a choice. Spill your guts or you'll be handed over to No Nose Novello for questioning. And No Nose is always in a bad mood.

Reply
May 27, 2017 09:00:13   #
mongo Loc: TEXAS
 
Docadhoc wrote:
Then shot.


Only if they survived being "Drawn and Quartered!"

SEMPER FI

Reply
May 27, 2017 09:09:34   #
Mollie
 
Anyone found guilty should never be allowed to receive a pension, health care benefits or other entitlements they would qualify for at the time of retiring. 😈

Reply
 
 
May 27, 2017 09:41:06   #
bahmer
 
Mollie wrote:
Anyone found guilty should never be allowed to receive a pension, health care benefits or other entitlements they would qualify for at the time of retiring. 😈


They should also lose their citizenship and be shipped over to Kenya to await their leaders return.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.