moldyoldy

You are revolting and misinformed.

U.S. intelligence officers intercepted a conversation last May of a Russian spy bragging Moscow "was getting ready to pay [Hillary] Clinton back" by meddling in the November election, according to news reports Thursday.
"In May 2016, a Russian military intelligence officer bragged to a colleague that his organization, known as the GRU, was getting ready to pay Clinton back for what President Vladimir Putin believed was an influence operation she had run against him five years earlier as secretary of state," Time magazine reported.

"The GRU, he said, was going to cause chaos in the upcoming U.S. election.
"What the officer didn't know, senior intelligence officials tell Time, was that "U.S. spies were listening," Time reported, quoting top U.S. intelligence officials.

"They wrote up the conversation and sent it back to analysts at headquarters, who turned it from raw intelligence into an official report and circulated it.
"But if the officer's boast seems like a red flag now, at the time U.S. officials didn't know what to make of it," the magazine said.
"We didn't really understand the context of it until much later," the senior intelligence official said.
SPECIAL:


The boast is now considered "the first indication U.S. spies had from their sources that Russia wasn't just hacking email accounts to collect intelligence but was also considering interfering in the vote," Time reported.
In 2011, Putin publicly accused Clinton and the State Department of fueling protests in 70 cities that threatened his re-election bid.
The demonstrations were organized on social media by a popular blogger named Alexei Navalny.

The State Department retorted it only financed pro-democracy organizations.
According to Time, a Russian soldier in Ukraine "successfully infiltrated a U.S. social media group by pretending to be a 42-year-old American housewife and weighing in on political debates with specially tailored messages."
Moscow also created a Facebook profile to spread stories on specific issues that sought to influence particular reporters, the U.S. officials said.

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/election-meddling-bragging-spy/2017/05/18/id/791035/

LiberalLulu

Being impeached does not mean he will automatically no longer be president.

Democrats are too stupid to recognize that.

LiberalLulu

Just exactly what is it you do not understand about deception, turd?

zillaorange

show some proof, ANY PROOF !!!

zillaorange

guess we'll have to wait for the "18 undisclosed contacts" to be made public or leaked , some probably have ! In the meantime the dems & MSM should shut the hell up & stop trying to evoke trouble !!!

zillaorange

so before you start screaming for impeachment, let's wait for the FACTS !!!

zillaorange

says who ? you ? LOL

Tomtrout

Can anyone tell me one new bill sponsored by the democrats that is being considered or voted on in the new congress

moldyoldy

Judicial Watch is an American conservative non-partisan[1] watchdog group that files Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits to investigate alleged misconduct by government officials

Judicial Watch was founded in 1994 by attorney and right-wing activist Larry Klayman, who hired the current president Tom Fitton before leaving in 2003.[2] Klayman has since accused Fitton of claiming credit for the early successes of Judicial Watch.[

Funding[edit]
Judicial Watch has an annual budget of about $35 million.[2] Between 1997 and 2002 Judicial Watch received $7,069,500 in 19 grants from a handful of foundations. The bulk of this funding came from three foundations: the Sarah Scaife Foundation, a funder of politically conservative causes;[56] The Carthage Foundation, which merged into the Sarah Scaife Foundation in 2014;[57] and the John M. Olin Foundation, Inc.,[citation needed] another conservative foundation which folded in 2005.[58] As of 2010, the Sarah Scaife Foundation was the group's largest contributor.[59

zillaorange

billy boy was impeached for lying to Congress. He remained in office !

zillaorange

[quote=moldyoldy]Judicial Watch is an American conservative non-partisan[1] watchdog group that files Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits to investigate alleged misconduct by government officials

Judicial Watch was founded in 1994 by attorney and right-wing activist Larry Klayman, who hired the current president Tom Fitton before leaving in 2003.[2] Klayman has since accused Fitton of claiming credit for the early successes of Judicial Watch.[

Funding[edit]
Judicial Watch has an annual budget of about $35 million.[2] Between 1997 and 2002 Judicial Watch received $7,069,500 in 19 grants from a handful of foundations. The bulk of this funding came from three foundations: the Sarah Scaife Foundation, a funder of politically conservative causes;[56] The Carthage Foundation, which merged into the Sarah Scaife Foundation in 2014;[57] and the John M. Olin Foundation, Inc.,[citation needed] another conservative foundation which folded in 2005.[58] As of 2010, the Sarah Scaife Foundation was the group's largest contributor.[59[/quote]

I get their read out every day, they investigate all "LEGIT" info ! Not rumors or innuendo !!!

Mr Bombastic

[quote=moldyoldy]Judicial Watch is an American conservative non-partisan[1] watchdog group that files Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits to investigate alleged misconduct by government officials

Judicial Watch was founded in 1994 by attorney and right-wing activist Larry Klayman, who hired the current president Tom Fitton before leaving in 2003.[2] Klayman has since accused Fitton of claiming credit for the early successes of Judicial Watch.[

Funding[edit]
Judicial Watch has an annual budget of about $35 million.[2] Between 1997 and 2002 Judicial Watch received $7,069,500 in 19 grants from a handful of foundations. The bulk of this funding came from three foundations: the Sarah Scaife Foundation, a funder of politically conservative causes;[56] The Carthage Foundation, which merged into the Sarah Scaife Foundation in 2014;[57] and the John M. Olin Foundation, Inc.,[citation needed] another conservative foundation which folded in 2005.[58] As of 2010, the Sarah Scaife Foundation was the group's largest contributor.[59[/quote]

That tells me that Conservatives are the only ones who care to investigate our elected officials. Do you know of any Liberal organizations that do the same thing? I can't think of any. Why is that?

zillaorange

Larry the Legend Loc: Not hiding in Milton

Perfect. Run the investigation for the next 8 years then release findings, of which there will be none. That should keep the snowflakes quiet while President Trump makes America great again. Most excellent.

Larry the Legend Loc: Not hiding in Milton

Not likely, but they sure wish it was! President Trump knows how they operate and has the ability to send them into conniptions pretty much at a snap of his fingers. They're falling over themselves to try and bring him down and all they're doing is making fools of themselves. So much for the 'fourth estate', who are slowly being marginalized, sidelined and replaced by the 'fifth estate'.


Entertaining, isn't it? Trump says a few words and off they go, good for another week. They're being epically punk'd, they know it, there's nothing they can do about it, and they fall for it every time, just like Lucy holding the football. If it wasn't free I'd buy a ticket just to watch.


Ha! Fat chance! You'd have better luck counting the gold at Ft. Knox, auditing the Federal Reserve System or getting an accounting of expenses out of the Pentagon. The DNC are not going to let anyone with government investigative authorities anywhere near their computer systems. Way too much dirty laundry being hidden in there. Why do you suppose they never asked the FBI to look their systems over when they claimed they were hacked by the Russians? No way, Jose! They'd all be sitting in prison.