Big Bass wrote:
If he quoted a source, it is not on this thread. Your sources are all bogus at best. Wanna buy a bridge??
he can't reveal the source, remember deep throat?
moldyoldy wrote:
he can't reveal the source, remember deep throat?
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!! Wanna buy a bridge?? Same source tells me all libturds may be tried for Treasonous Acts.
Big Bass wrote:
If he quoted a source, it is not on this thread. Your sources are all bogus at best. Wanna buy a bridge??
Moldy's unteachable. If he had the money he'd buy it. Maybe you can discount the bridge.
Big Bass wrote:
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!! Wanna buy a bridge?? Same source tells me all libturds may be tried for Treasonous Acts.
Woodward and Bernstein got famous for buying that bridge.
moldyoldy wrote:
Woodward and Bernstein got famous for buying that bridge.
Who needs that kind of notoriety? How much are you offering?
Big Bass wrote:
Who needs that kind of notoriety? How much are you offering?
I don't think moldy understands the analogy.
Did you see my recent post on the "Playing Bloods and Crips" topic? That black women seem to look at their men as only sperm donors? Maybe that's how moldy views himself. That is, he is incapable of rational thought.
Dr.Dross wrote:
A sieve does not do justice to describe the deluge of leaks coming out of the WH. I am not one for conspiracy theories but the amount and coordination of these persistent leaks, in supposedly secure areas or in private, I feel demonstrates an organized attempt to unseat The Donald. A Whisper Coup. No way it can be just disgruntled staffers. Or that notion is a stretch. I am not inclined to the Machiavellian, as stated, yet that does not mean brilliant and sinister plots are not carried out wholly undetected, with appropriate fall guys of course.
One scenario:
Russia interfered with the 2016 election to help Trump get the office, which they not only knew would be widely unpopular but also they would have the unhinged and narcissistic dummy they wanted. Then they sabotage his presidency through a sophisticated monitoring system to expose the inner workings of the WH and throw the country into turmoil, deepening the divisiveness and keeping the country thoroughly distracted from nearly anything else for some devious final play.
The other scenarios work out principally the same but could be hatched by the alt-right or alt-left. With a little thought I think you can figure out why those extreme groups could help fulfill their own agenda.
Or it is just Trump.
A sieve does not do justice to describe the deluge... (
show quote)
Trump, after all, was MY choice. I certainly made no secret of that.
What is this constant referral on your part to alt-Left and alt-Right? 'Left and Right' no longer does it for you? Pretentious, aren't you, Drossy?
LiberalLulu wrote:
I don't think moldy understands the analogy.
Did you see my recent post on the "Playing Bloods and Crips" topic? That black women seem to look at their men as only sperm donors? Maybe that's how moldy views himself. That is, he is incapable of rational thought.
We do bitch and complain about the black men who get their women pregnant, then abrogate all responsibility as to the raising of that child. While I still strongly believe that those fathers must pay their fair share of raising their offspring, I'm not sure a "man" of that caliber would make a good role-model for that young child.
Big Bass wrote:
We do bitch and complain about the black men who get their women pregnant, then abrogate all responsibility as to the raising of that child. While I still strongly believe that those fathers must pay their fair share of raising their offspring, I'm not sure a "man" of that caliber would make a good role-model for that young child.
You can thank Liberal policies for that. I'm sure those black adolescents have the right feelings, they've just been woman-handled to the point where their only outlet is violence and violent gangs. I've known some of those young black men and they are yearning for control and responsibility.
(By the way, groupism is a trait of adolescents in the first place; usually it's not so violent. Dems are not making it any better, with their "group" and ethnic studies. In the normal scheme of things, as an adolescent matures, he becomes less and less dependent on a "group". Some people have asked me whether I have ever wanted to be part of a group. That shows a complete lack of either sociological or psychological understanding of human nature.)
Big Bass wrote:
We do bitch and complain about the black men who get their women pregnant, then abrogate all responsibility as to the raising of that child. While I still strongly believe that those fathers must pay their fair share of raising their offspring, I'm not sure a "man" of that caliber would make a good role-model for that young child.
I believe that this is what the Bible was referring to when it mentioned the sins of the father being visited upon the third and fourth generation.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.