Loki wrote:
Why hello there, Fauxgenius! As usual, your head is so far up your ass that you have no idea as to what is actually going on. While you may consider the link I used as far right wing, it used the Wall Street Journal as a source. Had you actually bothered to read the article, you would have found that according to the Obama DOJ, blacks were charged with over half of the murders, and nearly half the assaults despite their small number. People who commit more violent crimes are more likely to get shot. Overall, four percent of black homicides were caused by cops. Black cops are three times more likely to shoot than white cops, and forty percent of cop killers are black. You are so eager to try and find a straw to grasp in your futile search for an error on my part, you cannot even pay attention. Once more, you show yourself to be a venal, stupid little pissant with an overgrown sense of it's own importance and intelligence. The stats I cited, as I mentioned, are also from the Obama Administration DOJ, hardly a racist organization. You are a very poor excuse for the PhD you claim to be. Of course, you're a poor excuse for most everything else, also.
Why hello there, Fauxgenius! As usual, your head i... (
show quote)
The Wall Street Journal is a Murdoch rag.
Irrespective of all your usual chimp act, the relevant statistic is in the piece I cited. It doesn't matter whether the cop was black or white. It certainly doesn't have anything to do with crime rates: the statistics are about the behavior of police, not their victims.
Feckless idiots (righties) fall for your incompetent maundering. Logic and fact speak truly.
Sheep dip.