Pennylynn wrote:
For the most part I agree with you on authorship. However, many of the writings of the true disciples of Jesus were considered ineligible for the "canon" put together in Rome. The Gospel of Matthias mentioned by Origen of Alexandria (c. 185-254); by Eusebius (c. 263-339), who attributes it to heretics; by Jerome (347-420), and in the Decretum Gelasianum (late fifth century) which declares it apocryphal. However, it also comes at the end of the list of the Biblical Canon in the Codex Baroccianus 206, formerly in the library of Francesco Barozzi of Venice (1537-1604). So, only bits and pieces are available for review outside of the Vatican which houses many of the "lost" book.... in actuality, those books that did not support the sitting panel who made the ruling on what to include or put into the vaults to not see the light of day again. We know that there were 70 additional disciples of Jesus, many wrote their "stories." However, when you dig through associated text of the time, you will find glimmers of their traditions and teaching. For example, Matthias is reported in several documents having said: ""We must combat our flesh, set no value upon it, and concede to it nothing that can flatter it, but rather increase the growth of our soul by faith and knowledge.” (Stromateis, III, 4) If you want to know more about this disciple who was selected by the Holy Spirit as well as those who were hand selected by Jesus (according to the bible) I can recommend Wilton Barnhardt's book, Gospel (1993).
For the most part I agree with you on authorship. ... (
show quote)
You and (Zimariah) spelling seem to know so much about these things. What are your respective backgrounds as to your knowledge.