One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Democrats embarrass themselves again.
Page <<first <prev 4 of 10 next> last>>
Apr 20, 2017 01:13:28   #
Nickolai
 
Armagh wrote:
So it wasn't until after that, that you started to bust unions. Good night, Nick.





That I started to bust unions ? How's that

Reply
Apr 20, 2017 01:15:23   #
Nickolai
 
Nickolai wrote:
I first came to California in 1927 we lived in a labor camp my father picking peaches others in the camp picked cotton for seventeen cents per hundred pounds picked My grand father let two farms in Oklahoma go back to the county because he couldn't pay the taxes he was in the same camp we were in along with my uncle . John Steinbeck wrote the Grapes of Wrath that year travelling up and down the great San Joaquin Valley with the Okie immigrants The great Visalia flood in the last chapter I remember vividly water in all directions as far as the eye could see at the end of the season the State bought us train tickets back to Oklahoma because hordes of Okies who couldn't find work was scaring the hell out of the locals. They would come out to the Hoovervilles with ball bas and ax handles yelling for the Okies to get the hell out of here and don't come back till the cottons ready to pick. Here in Brentwood on the western edge of the Delta the cops round up the in employed vagrants and held them in a barbed wire pen by the train depot when a train came through they loaded them in box cars and dumped them off in the next county. When the Japs bombed Pearl my dad ran up to Oklahoma A&M college and took a six week course in welding jumped in a model A Ford and headed it to Oakland California and a job in a shipyard My mom sister and I followed a few weeks later. My parents had been tenant farmers for 10 years and went broke every year in 1935 the worst drought year the 80 acres they farmed only produced two bails of cotton at $25 dollars per bail and the land lord got half and the House burned to the ground with every thing we owned and two years later they made their way to California. by the mid 50's I had a wife and two girls and we were able to live a standard of living our parents could not have dreamed of just 20 years earlier . The two farms my Grandfather let go to the county for lack of money to pay taxes eventually sprouted oil wells on both farms
I first came to California in 1927 we lived in a l... (show quote)





That was 1937 not 27

Reply
Apr 20, 2017 01:26:45   #
PeterS
 
Docadhoc wrote:
In other words the right received 4% more than the left. Yeah, a great bragging point for the left.


Tom Price won the same district by 20 points so yes, four points is a victory. You guys are just hanging onto the senate and have 18 congressional seats up in states Hillary won. Good luck next year cuz you really are going to need it...

Reply
 
 
Apr 20, 2017 01:31:11   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
Nickolai wrote:
He has filled the swamp with billionaires and millionaires and doing stupid things like cutting funds to a UN program that fights female genital mutilation and all funds fighting global warming and climate change that threatens humanity and all living things on earth. Junking regulations that restrained coal companies from dumping waste in steams ect ect


The US uses about 11% of the world's coal, yet we are only responsible for about 5% of the coal related pollution. We have the cleanest coal industry in the world. Obama would have crippled an major industry with nothing to replace it to placate idiots like you, and the rest of the world would have laughed their heads off at out stupidity while the continued producing 95% plus of the pollutants. We use more coal than any other nation, NOT more than all of them, and China and India and I believe Russia also all produce considerably more coal related pollution than us.
A UN program that fights female genital mutilation? Is that one as wildly successful as most other UN programs? Tell me, how do funds "fight" global warming? Exactly how. Not some vague assed generalizations, nuts and bolts. Specificity. Speaking of global warming, how about the names and creds of some of these "97%" of all scientists who allegedly believe in anthropogenic (manmade) climate change? Your buddy Theotts was kind enough to provide some non-working links for his "proof." Maybe you have some that work? Remember, 97% of all scientists. Surely you can find a couple that are not receiving money from any person or organization that is making money off the promotion of anthropogenic climate change.

Reply
Apr 20, 2017 01:42:38   #
Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere
 
Nickolai wrote:
I think The rump didn't just become civic minded and try and save America. He does not do anything unless there is big money to be made that's why he refuses to make his tax returns available so the public can see where he has been making his money and refuses to divest he has a deal with Putin to remove the economic sanctions placed on Russia by Obama after Putin took Crimea and squashed the half a trillion deal ExxonMobill had with Putin to drill for oil in the Barents Sea. Why else did Rex Tillerson CEO of Exxon want to be Sec of State. He has recused himself for two years from and decisions on the sanctions but why not for the duration of his time in government. Now we see Exxon is pursuing a waiver from the Treasury Dept. sanctions to drill in the Black Sea in a venture with Rosneft the Russian state oil company. The waiver was requested under the Obama administration and was not granted. Exxon has billions at stake 68 % of their assets are in Russia a billion barrel pool of oil has been discovered in the Kara Sea since the sanctions were initiated removal or a waiver could mean a trillion dollars to Exxon and I Trump can get them what they want it will mean billions possibly to Trumps enterprise he doesn't give a shit about the American people that's all political posturing they knew if he was going to win he would have to turn the Rust belt red he said what they wanted to hear and it did. Tillerson has recused himself from this waiver request but that just means it will go through its all about the money bigly
I think The rump didn't just become civic minded a... (show quote)


How did Obama have any say so over drilling in another country? Really?

Reply
Apr 20, 2017 01:51:59   #
Nickolai
 
Loki wrote:
The US uses about 11% of the world's coal, yet we are only responsible for about 5% of the coal related pollution. We have the cleanest coal industry in the world. Obama would have crippled an major industry with nothing to replace it to placate idiots like you, and the rest of the world would have laughed their heads off at out stupidity while the continued producing 95% plus of the pollutants. We use more coal than any other nation, NOT more than all of them, and China and India and I believe Russia also all produce considerably more coal related pollution than us.
A UN program that fights female genital mutilation? Is that one as wildly successful as most other UN programs? Tell me, how do funds "fight" global warming? Exactly how. Not some vague assed generalizations, nuts and bolts. Specificity. Speaking of global warming, how about the names and creds of some of these "97%" of all scientists who allegedly believe in anthropogenic (manmade) climate change? Your buddy Theotts was kind enough to provide some non-working links for his "proof." Maybe you have some that work? Remember, 97% of all scientists. Surely you can find a couple that are not receiving money from any person or organization that is making money off the promotion of anthropogenic climate change.
The US uses about 11% of the world's coal, yet we ... (show quote)






Not true. coal is not clean, and never has China uses more coal than any country in the world and they are chocking to death about a million Chinese die per year from polluted air but China is
trying desperately to go green. The United States is a net exporter of coal. However, some coal is still imported, mostly for power plants on the eastern and southern coasts of the country, where it is cheaper to ship in coal by sea from South America than transport it from mines in the northern and western United States. In the third quarter of 2016, the U.S. exported 12.6 million short tons of coal (6.5% of total production) to dozens of countries around the world; the largest markets were the Netherlands (16% of all exports), Canada (12%), and Brazil (12%).
In the third quarter of 2016, the U.S. imported 2.7 million short tons of coal, mostly from Colombia (80%), Canada (12%), and Indonesia (6%)[2].
Coal exports have decreased since 2012 as U.S. coal production has declined, mostly because cheaper natural gas and renewable energy sources have decreased the demand for coal as a fuel for electricity generation.

Reply
Apr 20, 2017 01:54:32   #
Nickolai
 
Docadhoc wrote:
How did Obama have any say so over drilling in another country? Really?







He didn't have any say over drilling in another country but he placed sanctions on Russia which out NATO partners honored. Probably the reason Trump came aboard complaining about NATO being out dated

Reply
 
 
Apr 20, 2017 02:37:08   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
Nickolai wrote:
Not true. coal is not clean, and never has China uses more coal than any country in the world and they are chocking to death about a million Chinese die per year from polluted air but China is
trying desperately to go green. The United States is a net exporter of coal. However, some coal is still imported, mostly for power plants on the eastern and southern coasts of the country, where it is cheaper to ship in coal by sea from South America than transport it from mines in the northern and western United States. In the third quarter of 2016, the U.S. exported 12.6 million short tons of coal (6.5% of total production) to dozens of countries around the world; the largest markets were the Netherlands (16% of all exports), Canada (12%), and Brazil (12%).
In the third quarter of 2016, the U.S. imported 2.7 million short tons of coal, mostly from Colombia (80%), Canada (12%), and Indonesia (6%)[2].
Coal exports have decreased since 2012 as U.S. coal production has declined, mostly because cheaper natural gas and renewable energy sources have decreased the demand for coal as a fuel for electricity generation.
Not true. coal is not clean, and never has China ... (show quote)


Coal provides nearly half our electricity. Just what do you propose to replace it with? I mean realistically, not some bullshit theory. I never said coal was clean, I said ours was cleaner than anyone else's already, which accounts for the relatively small amount of coal caused pollution we are responsible for. It took decades for coal pollution to get to the point it was a few years ago, yet you Liberals expect someone to wave a magic wand and clean it up overnight, then wave another wand and produce a replacement for coal, just like that.

Reply
Apr 20, 2017 04:26:12   #
PeterS
 
Loki wrote:
The US uses about 11% of the world's coal, yet we are only responsible for about 5% of the coal related pollution. We have the cleanest coal industry in the world. Obama would have crippled an major industry with nothing to replace it to placate idiots like you, and the rest of the world would have laughed their heads off at out stupidity while the continued producing 95% plus of the pollutants. We use more coal than any other nation, NOT more than all of them, and China and India and I believe Russia also all produce considerably more coal related pollution than us.
A UN program that fights female genital mutilation? Is that one as wildly successful as most other UN programs? Tell me, how do funds "fight" global warming? Exactly how. Not some vague assed generalizations, nuts and bolts. Specificity. Speaking of global warming, how about the names and creds of some of these "97%" of all scientists who allegedly believe in anthropogenic (manmade) climate change? Your buddy Theotts was kind enough to provide some non-working links for his "proof." Maybe you have some that work? Remember, 97% of all scientists. Surely you can find a couple that are not receiving money from any person or organization that is making money off the promotion of anthropogenic climate change.
The US uses about 11% of the world's coal, yet we ... (show quote)

The only reason we have the cleanest coal industry in the world is because of the regulations we've imposed on the coal industry--the same regulations that Trump is going to do away with and you are happy to see him do it. You are welcome to boast all you like, just don't boast about accomplishments that we liberals made and conservatives fought tooth and nail to prevent. So please, stop boasting about something you didn't want to see happen. And by the way, what crippled the coal industry is all the cheap natural gas that coal has to compete against not Obama and the clean air that you have to breath. Maybe if we strip away all the regulations governing coal then it can be competitive again? Do that and we won't have the cleanest coal industry in the world though will we. Well, you didn't really want it in the first place did you....

Reply
Apr 20, 2017 04:37:48   #
PeterS
 
Loki wrote:
Coal provides nearly half our electricity. Just what do you propose to replace it with? I mean realistically, not some bullshit theory. I never said coal was clean, I said ours was cleaner than anyone else's already, which accounts for the relatively small amount of coal caused pollution we are responsible for. It took decades for coal pollution to get to the point it was a few years ago, yet you Liberals expect someone to wave a magic wand and clean it up overnight, then wave another wand and produce a replacement for coal, just like that.
Coal provides nearly half our electricity. Just wh... (show quote)

Expand our use of natural gas, start funding more solar energy for our homes, and add nuclear. Couple that with wind power and we can eliminate coal in 20 years. Train our coal miners to do something else and lead the world in something instead of always trying to follow...

You know, back when America was great and the government poured massive amounts into R&D. You know, the good ole days, the days Trump promised to bring back to us. The only thing stopping us from doing it is the political will to get er done...

Reply
Apr 20, 2017 06:50:55   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
PeterS wrote:
Expand our use of natural gas, start funding more solar energy for our homes, and add nuclear. Couple that with wind power and we can eliminate coal in 20 years. Train our coal miners to do something else and lead the world in something instead of always trying to follow...

You know, back when America was great and the government poured massive amounts into R&D. You know, the good ole days, the days Trump promised to bring back to us. The only thing stopping us from doing it is the political will to get er done...
Expand our use of natural gas, start funding more ... (show quote)


You mean expand our use of the same natural gas the Obama Administration was opposed to letting companies drill for? THAT natural gas? Solar energy is a long way from being as effective as you think. Most people who know little about solar energy are in favor of it.
I thought you Liberals were opposed to nuclear power. Look at Fukishima, at Three Mile Island and Chernobyl. Glowing in the dark would probably solve some of our night time lighting issues. You mean you dare to disagree with Obama the Magnificent and Hillary the Harpy, both of whom were opposed to nuclear power? Where do you think we would obtain the natural gas they didn't want to drill for?
Whatever happened to your boy Obama's prating about "clean coal?"

Reply
 
 
Apr 20, 2017 08:26:09   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
Nickolai wrote:
Linda they aren't calling it a victory they are only hopping for victory they surely not suffering from over confidence


Au contraire, Nick, they absolutely did call it a victory all day long and how they were taking back the seats and on their way to great things....The first of many more to come etc....

Good Morning, as well....

Reply
Apr 20, 2017 09:41:01   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
Sounds wonderful. If the Chinese, your communist brethren keep burning dirty coal millions of them will croak. If they try to go green their economy will tank. Winner, winner general tao chicken dinner.
Nickolai wrote:
Not true. coal is not clean, and never has China uses more coal than any country in the world and they are chocking to death about a million Chinese die per year from polluted air but China is
trying desperately to go green. The United States is a net exporter of coal. However, some coal is still imported, mostly for power plants on the eastern and southern coasts of the country, where it is cheaper to ship in coal by sea from South America than transport it from mines in the northern and western United States. In the third quarter of 2016, the U.S. exported 12.6 million short tons of coal (6.5% of total production) to dozens of countries around the world; the largest markets were the Netherlands (16% of all exports), Canada (12%), and Brazil (12%).
In the third quarter of 2016, the U.S. imported 2.7 million short tons of coal, mostly from Colombia (80%), Canada (12%), and Indonesia (6%)[2].
Coal exports have decreased since 2012 as U.S. coal production has declined, mostly because cheaper natural gas and renewable energy sources have decreased the demand for coal as a fuel for electricity generation.
Not true. coal is not clean, and never has China ... (show quote)

Reply
Apr 20, 2017 09:45:30   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
You don't want to drill remember. So are you and your brethren donating the natural gas? Wouldn't want to work in that plant. Ah. the typical liberal mantra. Start funding. You never disappoint. Who supplies the funds? Frankly petey I am about funded out. After paying Federal taxes, my SS and Medicare, my unaffordable Obamacare premium I just can't fund your solar panel.
PeterS wrote:
Expand our use of natural gas, start funding more solar energy for our homes, and add nuclear. Couple that with wind power and we can eliminate coal in 20 years. Train our coal miners to do something else and lead the world in something instead of always trying to follow...

You know, back when America was great and the government poured massive amounts into R&D. You know, the good ole days, the days Trump promised to bring back to us. The only thing stopping us from doing it is the political will to get er done...
Expand our use of natural gas, start funding more ... (show quote)

Reply
Apr 20, 2017 09:59:46   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
JFlorio wrote:
You don't want to drill remember. So are you and your brethren donating the natural gas? Wouldn't want to work in that plant. Ah. the typical liberal mantra. Start funding. You never disappoint. Who supplies the funds? Frankly petey I am about funded out. After paying Federal taxes, my SS and Medicare, my unaffordable Obamacare premium I just can't fund you solar panel.


It goes without saying that Pete boy thinks the government should be in charge. Preferably Liberal Democrats, like the ones who brought you such solar success stories as Solyndra.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 10 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.